Suppr超能文献

基于OTU和ASV方法的污水处理厂系统微生物组分析——生态数据的比较解读

Microbiome Analysis via OTU and ASV-Based Pipelines-A Comparative Interpretation of Ecological Data in WWTP Systems.

作者信息

Jeske Jan Torsten, Gallert Claudia

机构信息

Faculty of Technology, Microbiology-Biotechnology, University of Applied Science Emden/Leer, 26723 Emden, Germany.

出版信息

Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Mar 29;9(4):146. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9040146.

Abstract

Linking community composition and ecosystem function via the cultivation-independent analysis of marker genes, e.g., the 16S rRNA gene, is a staple of microbial ecology and dependent disciplines. The certainty of results, independent of the bioinformatic handling, is imperative for any advances made within the field. In this work, thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion experimental data, together with primary and waste-activated sludge prokaryotic community data, were analyzed with two pipelines that apply different principles when dealing with technical, sequencing, and PCR biases. One pipeline (VSEARCH) employs clustering methods, generating individual operational taxonomic units (OTUs), while the other (DADA2) is based on sequencing error correction algorithms and generates exact amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). The outcomes of both pipelines were compared within the framework of ecological-driven data analysis. Both pipelines provided comparable results that would generally allow for the same interpretations. Yet, the two approaches also delivered community compositions that differed between 6.75% and 10.81% between pipelines. Inconsistencies were also observed linked to biologically driven variability in the samples, which affected the two pipelines differently. These pipeline-dependent differences in taxonomic assignment could lead to different conclusions and interfere with any downstream analysis made for such mis- or not-identified species, e.g., network analysis or predictions of their respective ecosystem service.

摘要

通过对标记基因(如16S rRNA基因)进行非培养分析来关联群落组成与生态系统功能,是微生物生态学及其相关学科的一项主要工作。对于该领域取得的任何进展而言,结果的确定性(独立于生物信息处理)至关重要。在这项工作中,利用两条在处理技术、测序和PCR偏差时应用不同原理的流程,对嗜热厌氧共消化实验数据以及原初和废弃活性污泥原核生物群落数据进行了分析。一条流程(VSEARCH)采用聚类方法,生成单个操作分类单元(OTU),而另一条流程(DADA2)基于测序错误校正算法,生成精确的扩增子序列变体(ASV)。在生态驱动的数据分析框架内,对两条流程的结果进行了比较。两条流程都提供了具有可比性的结果,通常能得出相同的解释。然而,两种方法得出的群落组成在流程之间也存在6.75%至10.81%的差异。还观察到与样本中生物驱动的变异性相关的不一致性,这对两条流程的影响有所不同。分类归属中这些依赖流程的差异可能导致不同的结论,并干扰针对此类错误识别或未识别物种进行的任何下游分析,例如网络分析或对其各自生态系统服务的预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1a9/9029325/f2fd6b22aab4/bioengineering-09-00146-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验