Roman Nadinne Alexandra, Miclaus Roxana Steliana, Nicolau Cristina, Sechel Gabriela
Faculty of Medicine, Transilvania University of Brasov, 500036 Brasov, Romania.
Faculty of Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Transilvania University of Brasov, 500036 Brasov, Romania.
Brain Sci. 2022 Mar 28;12(4):457. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12040457.
In neuro-rehabilitation, the assessment of post-stroke patients’ motor function of damaged upper extremities (UEs) is essential. Clinicians need clear and concise assessment instruments to monitor progress recorded in intensive rehabilitation sessions. One such instrument is Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), which, in our view, requires a modified scoring model aimed at improving the assessment process of patients’ motor and functional UE status, and recording their step-by-step-progress, especially if patients undergo a short length of hospitalization (of about 10 therapy days). Hence, this paper presents a new scoring system developed by the authors. This systemresults in a more precise MMT grading scale, which has more grades and can provide a more specific muscular assessment, while offering more clarity in quantifying patients’ progress after physical therapy. A prospective study was made of 41 post-stroke patients with upper extremity (UE) impairments. To determine the validity of the assessment tool for hypothesizing, and the unidimensionality and internal consistency of the customized model, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with a structural equation model (SEM), Cronbach’s Alpha, and Pearson correlation coefficients were used with Fugl−Meyer (FM) assessments, the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), AROM, and the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS). Considering the unidimensionality of the instrument used, we performed a linear regression to identify whether certain movements performed segmentally by the manually evaluated muscles influence the measured manual score of the whole UE. All indices suggested a good model fit, and a Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.920 suggested strong internal consistency. The Pearson correlation coefficient of the MMT-customized score with AROM was 0.857, p < 0.001; that with FMUE was 0.905, p < 0.001; that with MRS was −0.608, p = 0.010; and that with MAS was −0.677, p < 0.001. The linear regression results suggest that wrist extensors, shoulder abductors, and finger flexors can influence the manual assessment of the muscle strength of the whole UE, thereby improving post-stroke patient management. The results of our research suggest that, using the proposed scoring, MMT may be a useful tool for UE assessment in post-stroke patients.
在神经康复中,评估中风后患者受损上肢(UE)的运动功能至关重要。临床医生需要清晰简洁的评估工具来监测强化康复疗程中记录的进展情况。手动肌力测试(MMT)就是这样一种工具,在我们看来,它需要一种改进的评分模型,旨在改善对患者上肢运动和功能状态的评估过程,并记录他们的逐步进展情况,特别是对于住院时间较短(约10个治疗日)的患者。因此,本文介绍了作者开发的一种新的评分系统。该系统产生了一个更精确的MMT分级量表,有更多的等级,可以提供更具体的肌肉评估,同时在量化患者物理治疗后的进展方面更加清晰。对41例有上肢(UE)损伤的中风后患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。为了确定用于假设的评估工具的有效性,以及定制模型的单维度性和内部一致性,使用了带有结构方程模型(SEM)的探索性和验证性因子分析(CFA)、克朗巴哈系数(Cronbach's Alpha)以及皮尔逊相关系数,并结合Fugl - Meyer(FM)评估、改良Ashworth量表(MAS)、关节活动范围(AROM)和改良Rankin量表(MRS)。考虑到所使用工具的单维度性,我们进行了线性回归,以确定手动评估的肌肉分段执行的某些动作是否会影响整个上肢的手动评分。所有指标都表明模型拟合良好,克朗巴哈系数(Cronbach's Alpha)为0.920表明内部一致性很强。MMT定制评分与AROM的皮尔逊相关系数为0.857,p < 0.001;与FM上肢评分的相关系数为0.905,p < 0.001;与MRS的相关系数为 - 0.608,p = 0.010;与MAS的相关系数为 - 0.677,p < 0.001。线性回归结果表明,腕伸肌、肩外展肌和手指屈肌会影响整个上肢肌肉力量的手动评估,从而改善中风后患者的管理。我们的研究结果表明,使用所提出的评分方法,MMT可能是评估中风后患者上肢的有用工具。