• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

众人拾柴火焰高:运用网络科学来识别双语经历中的个体差异对心理理论的影响。

It Takes a Village: Using Network Science to Identify the Effect of Individual Differences in Bilingual Experience for Theory of Mind.

作者信息

Navarro Ester, DeLuca Vincent, Rossi Eleonora

机构信息

Center for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.

Department of Language and Culture, The Artic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens Veg 18, 9019 Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2022 Apr 9;12(4):487. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12040487.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci12040487
PMID:35448018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9024458/
Abstract

An increasing amount of research has examined the effects of bilingualism on performance in theory of mind (ToM) tasks. Bilinguals outperform monolinguals in ToM when comparing groups. However, it is unclear what aspects of the bilingual experience contribute to this effect in a dynamic construct like ToM. To date, bilingualism has been conceptualized as a dichotic skill that is distinct from monolingualism, obscuring nuances in the degree that different bilingual experience affects cognition. The current study used a combination of network science, cognitive, and linguistic behavioral measurements to explore the factors that influence perspective-taking ToM based on participants' current and previous experience with language, as well as their family networks' experience with language. The results suggest that some aspects of the bilingual experience predict task performance, but not others, and these predictors align with the two-system theory of ToM. Overall, the findings provide evidence for the extent to which individual differences in bilingualism are related to different cognitive outcomes.

摘要

越来越多的研究探讨了双语能力对心理理论(ToM)任务表现的影响。在比较群体时,双语者在心理理论任务中的表现优于单语者。然而,对于双语体验的哪些方面在像心理理论这样的动态结构中促成了这种影响,目前尚不清楚。迄今为止,双语能力被概念化为一种与单语能力不同的双耳技能,这掩盖了不同双语体验对认知影响程度的细微差别。本研究结合了网络科学、认知和语言行为测量方法,以探讨基于参与者当前和以往的语言体验以及其家庭网络的语言体验,影响观点采择心理理论的因素。结果表明,双语体验的某些方面可以预测任务表现,但其他方面则不然,而且这些预测因素与心理理论的双系统理论相符。总体而言,这些发现为双语能力的个体差异在多大程度上与不同的认知结果相关提供了证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d4/9024458/c5b5e0b7f936/brainsci-12-00487-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d4/9024458/c5b5e0b7f936/brainsci-12-00487-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d4/9024458/c5b5e0b7f936/brainsci-12-00487-g001a.jpg

相似文献

1
It Takes a Village: Using Network Science to Identify the Effect of Individual Differences in Bilingual Experience for Theory of Mind.众人拾柴火焰高:运用网络科学来识别双语经历中的个体差异对心理理论的影响。
Brain Sci. 2022 Apr 9;12(4):487. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12040487.
2
Adult bilinguals outperform monolinguals in theory of mind.成人双语者在心理理论方面优于单语者。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Nov;74(11):1841-1851. doi: 10.1177/17470218211009159. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
3
Bilingualism Predicts Affective Theory of Mind in Autistic Adults.双语能力预测自闭症成人的情感心理理论。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Jun 6;67(6):1785-1802. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00431. Epub 2024 May 3.
4
Early bilingualism enhances mechanisms of false-belief reasoning.早期双语能力可增强错误信念推理机制。
Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):48-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00742.x.
5
The cognitive benefits of bilingualism in autism spectrum disorder: Is theory of mind boosted and by which underlying factors?自闭症谱系障碍双语认知益处:是哪种心理理论得到提升以及通过哪些潜在因素?
Autism Res. 2021 Aug;14(8):1695-1709. doi: 10.1002/aur.2542. Epub 2021 May 19.
6
Age-related effect on language control and executive control in bilingual and monolingual speakers: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.年龄对双语和单语使用者语言控制和执行控制的影响:行为和电生理证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107336. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107336. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
7
The effects of bilingualism on attentional processes in the first year of life.双语对生命第一年注意过程的影响。
Dev Sci. 2021 Mar;24(2):e13011. doi: 10.1111/desc.13011. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
8
Theory of Mind and Executive Functions in Young Bilingual Children.幼儿双语儿童的心理理论与执行功能
J Genet Psychol. 2017 Sep-Oct;178(5):303-307. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2017.1361376.
9
A network-level analysis of cognitive flexibility reveals a differential influence of the anterior cingulate cortex in bilinguals versus monolinguals.一项关于认知灵活性的网络层面分析揭示了前扣带回皮质对双语者和单语者的不同影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 May;85:62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
10
What Is a Language? Who Is Bilingual? Perceptions Underlying Self-Assessment in Studies of Bilingualism.什么是语言?谁是双语者?双语研究中自我评估背后的认知。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 12;13:863991. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.863991. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Linguistic Markers of Theory of Mind in Spontaneous Speech: A Narrative Review.自发言语中心理理论的语言标记:一项叙述性综述。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 27;15(8):1016. doi: 10.3390/bs15081016.
2
Seeing Through Other Eyes: How Language Experience and Cognitive Abilities Shape Theory of Mind.透过他人之眼:语言经验与认知能力如何塑造心理理论
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 30;15(6):755. doi: 10.3390/bs15060755.
3
Inhibitory Control Partially Mediates the Relationship between Metalinguistic Awareness and Perspective-Taking.元语言意识与观点采择的关系部分受到抑制控制的调节。

本文引用的文献

1
Bridging people and perspectives: General and language-specific social network structure predict mentalizing across diverse sociolinguistic contexts.弥合人际与视角鸿沟:一般社会网络结构和语言特定社会网络结构可预测不同社会语言环境下的心理化能力。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Dec;76(4):235-250. doi: 10.1037/cep0000273. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
2
Measuring Bilingualism: The Quest for a "Bilingualism Quotient".衡量双语能力:对“双语能力商数”的探索。
Appl Psycholinguist. 2021 Mar;42(Suppl 2):527-548. doi: 10.1017/s0142716420000533. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
3
Adult bilinguals outperform monolinguals in theory of mind.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Sep 26;53(5):71. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10105-5.
4
The impact of bilingualism in within-language conflict resolution: an ERP study.双语在语言内冲突解决中的影响:一项事件相关电位研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 25;14:1173486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173486. eCollection 2023.
5
Children's social networks in developmental psychology: A network approach to capture and describe early social environments.发展心理学中的儿童社交网络:一种捕捉和描述早期社会环境的网络方法。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 14;13:1009422. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009422. eCollection 2022.
成人双语者在心理理论方面优于单语者。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Nov;74(11):1841-1851. doi: 10.1177/17470218211009159. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
4
Using Network Science to Map What Montréal Bilinguals Talk about Across Languages and Communicative Contexts.运用网络科学描绘蒙特利尔双语者在跨语言及交际语境下的谈话内容。
J Neurolinguistics. 2020 Nov;56. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100913. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
5
What Do Theory-of-Mind Tasks Actually Measure? Theory and Practice.心理理论任务到底测量什么?理论与实践。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Mar;15(2):384-396. doi: 10.1177/1745691619896607. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
6
Interactional context mediates the consequences of bilingualism for language and cognition.互动语境调节了双语对语言和认知的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Jun;46(6):1022-1047. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000770. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
7
The role of bilingual interactional contexts in predicting interindividual variability in executive functions: A latent variable analysis.双语互动语境在预测执行功能个体间变异性中的作用:潜在变量分析。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Apr;149(4):609-633. doi: 10.1037/xge0000672. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
8
Cross-language activation and executive control modulate within-language ambiguity resolution: Evidence from eye movements.跨语言激活和执行控制调节语言内歧义消解:来自眼动的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Mar;46(3):507-528. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000742. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
9
English only? Monolinguals in linguistically diverse contexts have an edge in language learning.仅使用英语?在语言多样化的环境中使用单语的人在语言学习方面具有优势。
Brain Lang. 2019 Sep;196:104644. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104644. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
10
Redefining bilingualism as a spectrum of experiences that differentially affects brain structure and function.将双语能力重新定义为一种影响大脑结构和功能的不同体验的连续体。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 9;116(15):7565-7574. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811513116. Epub 2019 Mar 26.