• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

琼脂玻片血培养装置与Bactec 6B用于检测菌血症的比较。

Comparison of an agar slide blood culture device with Bactec 6B for the detection of bacteremia.

作者信息

Berger S A, Battat A, Halperin E, Stein J, Dan M

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1987 Feb;87(2):272-5. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/87.2.272.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/87.2.272
PMID:3544802
Abstract

Each of 1,018 blood culture specimens was inoculated into Bactec 6B (Johnston Laboratories, Towson, MD) and a biphasic blood culture system that incorporates internal removable agar dip slides (Hylab). Ninety clinically significant pathogens were recovered: 66 from both systems, 14 from Bactec only, and 10 from Hylab only. The mean incubation times to positive of the two systems did not differ when data were examined for gram-negative bacilli, gram-positive cocci, total isolates, and contaminants (P greater than 0.05). Contamination rates were also comparable: Bactec 5.4%, Hylab 7.3% (P greater than 0.05). The Hylab system may offer a practical alternative to Bactec 6B.

摘要

1018份血培养标本每份都接种到Bactec 6B(约翰斯顿实验室,马里兰州陶森)和一种包含内部可移除琼脂浸片的双相血培养系统(Hylab)中。共分离出90株具有临床意义的病原体:66株在两种系统中均能分离到,14株仅在Bactec系统中分离到,10株仅在Hylab系统中分离到。当对革兰氏阴性杆菌、革兰氏阳性球菌、总分离株和污染物的数据进行检查时,两种系统阳性的平均孵育时间没有差异(P大于0.05)。污染率也相当:Bactec为5.4%,Hylab为7.3%(P大于0.05)。Hylab系统可能是Bactec 6B的一种实用替代方案。

相似文献

1
Comparison of an agar slide blood culture device with Bactec 6B for the detection of bacteremia.琼脂玻片血培养装置与Bactec 6B用于检测菌血症的比较。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1987 Feb;87(2):272-5. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/87.2.272.
2
Clinical comparison of a new automated infrared blood culture system with the BACTEC 460 system.一种新型自动红外血液培养系统与BACTEC 460系统的临床比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):262-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.262-266.1986.
3
Detection of bacteremia with the BACTEC 16B resin blood culture medium.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1984 May;81(5):643-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/81.5.643.
4
Controlled evaluation of the agar-slide and radiometric blood culture systems for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.琼脂平板和放射性血液培养系统检测菌血症和真菌血症的对照评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):221-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.221-225.1986.
5
Influence of a blood culture inoculation technique on detection of bacteremia by the BACTEC system.血培养接种技术对BACTEC系统检测菌血症的影响。
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Sep;16(3):590-2. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.590-592.1982.
6
Comparison of the BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle to the isolator tube, BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle, and BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle and comparison of the BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle to the Isolator tube for recovery of bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi from blood.比较BACTEC MYCO/F溶解瓶与隔离管、BACTEC Plus需氧F/瓶以及BACTEC厌氧溶解/10瓶,以及比较BACTEC Plus需氧F/瓶与隔离管从血液中分离细菌、分枝杆菌和真菌的能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Dec;39(12):4380-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.12.4380-4386.2001.
7
Yield, clinical significance, and cost of a combination BACTEC plus Septi-Chek blood culture system.BACTEC与Septi-Chek联合血液培养系统的阳性率、临床意义及成本
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 May;25(5):819-23. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.5.819-823.1987.
8
Clinical comparison of isolator and BACTEC 660 resin media for blood culture.用于血培养的隔离器与BACTEC 660树脂培养基的临床比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Sep;28(9):1925-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.1925-1927.1990.
9
A comparison of oxoid signal with nonradiometric BACTEC NR-660 for detection of bacteremia.氧化型信号与非放射性BACTEC NR-660检测菌血症的比较。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 Jan-Feb;13(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(90)90046-x.
10
Clinical laboratory comparison of the 10-ml isolator blood culture system with BACTEC radiometric blood culture media.10毫升隔离器血培养系统与BACTEC放射性血培养培养基的临床实验室比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):618-23. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.618-623.1984.