Vinas-Rios Juan Manuel, Wölm Jan-Henning, Sellei Richard Martin, Ladenburger Andreas
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach am Main, Germany.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Sanaklinik Offenbach am Main, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach am Main, Germany.
Patient Saf Surg. 2022 Apr 21;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13037-022-00324-x.
The notion that all acute hip fractures are a surgical entity requiring either surgical fracture fixation or hip replacement represents a historic dogma, particularly within the orthopaedic community of the United States. The present study from a European regional trauma center was designed to challenge the notion that stable and undisplaced femoral neck fractures represent an absolute indication for surgical management.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that stable and undisplaced femoral neck fractures of the Garden types 1 and 2 can be safely managed nonoperatively. A retrospective observational cohort study was carried out at a regional orthopaedic trauma center in Germany from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2021. The inclusion criteria specified patients older than 18 years suffering a < 24 h, traumatic, femoral neck fracture Garden types 1 and 2. Exclusion criteria included Garden types 3 and 4 femoral neck fractures, pregnancy, active infection or previous surgery, tumor-associated fractures, medical history of femoral neck necrosis, vascular injury associated with femoral neck fractures, nerve injury associated to a femoral neck fracture and ≥ 24 h femoral neck fracture. The primary intention of this research was to identify deterioration of fracture retention with an ensuing unplanned trip to the operating room in femoral neck fractures Garden types 1 and 2. Secondary were included unplanned readmissions and complications such as surgical site infection.
A total of 41 undisplaced femoral neck fractures (Garden types 1 and 2) were included in this study; n = 20 were in the resulting admission operatively treated (group 1) and n = 21 were treated conservatively. The mean age in group 1 was 76 years; women (70%). In group 2 it was 81 years with a female dominance (71.4%). Admission status: Garden types 1 and 2, group 1 n = 13/7 and group 2 n = 15/6. Subsequent femoral neck fracture displacement (Y/N) (in case of operation, before operation) group 1 n = 14/6 and group 2 n = 6/15.
According with our results, patients sustaining Garden type 1 femoral neck fractures, depending on age and comorbidities, should be treated conservatively with weight bearing and under physiotherapeutic instructions. In case of femoral neck fractures Garden type 2, a surgical treatment should be performed in order to avoid femoral neck fractures to slip after weight bearing by lacking of fracture impaction.
认为所有急性髋部骨折都是需要进行手术骨折固定或髋关节置换的外科疾病,这是一种历史教条,在美国骨科界尤其如此。本项来自欧洲地区创伤中心的研究旨在挑战以下观念:稳定且无移位的股骨颈骨折是手术治疗的绝对指征。
本研究的目的是调查以下假设:Garden 1型和2型稳定且无移位的股骨颈骨折可以安全地进行非手术治疗。2016年1月1日至2021年6月30日在德国一家地区骨科创伤中心开展了一项回顾性观察队列研究。纳入标准明确为年龄大于18岁、受伤时间<24小时、创伤性股骨颈骨折Garden 1型和2型的患者。排除标准包括Garden 3型和4型股骨颈骨折、妊娠、活动性感染或既往手术史、肿瘤相关骨折、股骨颈坏死病史、与股骨颈骨折相关的血管损伤、与股骨颈骨折相关的神经损伤以及股骨颈骨折时间≥24小时。本研究的主要目的是确定Garden 1型和2型股骨颈骨折后骨折固定情况恶化并随后进行计划外手术的情况。次要指标包括计划外再入院和手术部位感染等并发症。
本研究共纳入41例无移位股骨颈骨折(Garden 1型和2型);其中20例在入院后接受手术治疗(第1组),21例接受保守治疗。第1组的平均年龄为76岁;女性占70%。第2组平均年龄为81岁,女性占主导(71.4%)。入院时骨折类型:Garden 1型和2型,第1组为13/7,第2组为15/6。后续股骨颈骨折移位情况(是/否)(手术组为术前情况),第1组为14/6,第2组为6/15。
根据我们的研究结果,Garden 1型股骨颈骨折患者,应根据年龄和合并症情况,在负重及物理治疗指导下进行保守治疗。对于Garden 2型股骨颈骨折,应进行手术治疗,以避免因缺乏骨折嵌插而在负重后股骨颈骨折发生移位。