Xiong Xuechen, Li Jing, Huang Bo, Tam Tony, Hong Yingyi, Chong Ka-Chun, Huo Zhaohua
Institute of Future Cities, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Mar 23;10(4):495. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10040495.
Objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has imposed significant costs on economies. Safe and effective vaccines are a key tool to control the pandemic; however, vaccination programs can be costly. Are the benefits they bestow worth the costs they incur? The relative value of COVID-19 vaccines has not been widely assessed. In this study, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to provide evidence of the economic value of vaccines in Hong Kong. Method We developed a Markov model of COVID-19 infections using a susceptible-infected-recovered structure over a 1-year time horizon from a Hong Kong healthcare sector perspective to measure resource utilization, economic burden, and disease outcomes. The model consisted of two arms: do nothing and implement a vaccination program. We assessed effectiveness using units of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to measure the incremental cost-effectiveness at a HKD 1,000,000/QALY threshold. Results The vaccination program, which has reached approximately 72% of the population of Hong Kong with two vaccine doses, was found to have a cost of HKD 22,339,700 per QALY gained from February 2021 to February 2022. At a willingness-to-pay threshold, the vaccination program was not cost-effective in the context of the low prevalence of COVID-19 cases before the Omicron wave. However, the cost-effectiveness of a COVID-19 vaccine is sensitive to the infection rate. Hong Kong is now experiencing the fifth wave of the Omicron. It is estimated that the ICER of the vaccination program from February 2022 to February 2023 was HKD 310,094. The vaccination program in Hong Kong was cost-effective in the context of the Omicron. Conclusions Vaccination programs incur a large economic burden, and we therefore need to acknowledge their limitations in the short term. This will help relevant departments implement vaccination programs. From a longer-term perspective, the vaccination program will show great cost-effectiveness once infection rates are high in a regional outbreak. Compared with other age groups, it is suggested that the elderly population should be prioritized to improve the vaccine coverage rate.
目的 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行给经济带来了巨大成本。安全有效的疫苗是控制大流行的关键工具;然而,疫苗接种计划可能成本高昂。它们带来的益处是否值得其所产生的成本?COVID-19 疫苗的相对价值尚未得到广泛评估。在本研究中,进行了成本效益分析,以提供香港疫苗经济价值的证据。方法 我们从香港医疗保健部门的角度,在 1 年的时间范围内,使用易感-感染-康复结构建立了一个 COVID-19 感染的马尔可夫模型,以衡量资源利用、经济负担和疾病结果。该模型包括两个方案:不采取任何措施和实施疫苗接种计划。我们使用质量调整生命年(QALY)单位评估有效性,以在每 QALY 100 万港元的阈值下衡量增量成本效益。结果 截至 2022 年 2 月,香港约 72%的人口已接种两剂疫苗的疫苗接种计划,从 2021 年 2 月至 2022 年 2 月,每获得一个 QALY 的成本为 22339700 港元。在支付意愿阈值下,在奥密克戎浪潮之前 COVID-19 病例低流行的情况下,疫苗接种计划不具有成本效益。然而,COVID-19 疫苗的成本效益对感染率敏感。香港目前正在经历奥密克戎的第五波疫情。据估计,2022 年 2 月至 2023 年 2 月疫苗接种计划的增量成本效益比为 310094 港元。在奥密克戎疫情背景下,香港的疫苗接种计划具有成本效益。结论 疫苗接种计划会产生巨大的经济负担,因此我们需要认识到它们在短期内的局限性。这将有助于相关部门实施疫苗接种计划。从长远来看,一旦地区性疫情中感染率较高,疫苗接种计划将显示出巨大的成本效益。与其他年龄组相比,建议优先考虑老年人群体,以提高疫苗接种覆盖率。