Zakrzewski Arkadiusz Józef, Zarzecka Urszula, Chajęcka-Wierzchowska Wioleta, Zadernowska Anna
Department of Industrial and Food Microbiology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Plac Cieszyński 1, 10-726 Olsztyn, Poland.
Pathogens. 2022 Mar 28;11(4):410. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11040410.
Enterobacterales is a prevalent order, which inhabits a variety of environments including food. Due to the high similarities between pathogenic and non-pathogenic species, their identification might be difficult and laborious, and therefore there is a need for rapid and precise identification. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the available methods of identifying order strains isolated from fresh fish and shrimps (n = 62). The following methods were used in this study: biochemical, sequencing and identification using the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). For this purpose, biochemical identification was performed with the use of the EnteroTest 24N set, while the identification using the MALDI-TOF MS technology was operated on VITEK MS. Results were compared with identification made by 16S rRNA sequencing. The results of the study showed that conventional identification methods might provide a false result. Identification by VITEK MS to the species level was correct at 70.97%, and the accuracy of EnteroTest 24N identification did not exceed 50.0%. The genus identification reached 90.32% for the MALDI-TOF technique, while for EnteroTest 24N it was nearly 70.0%. Due to errors in identification, especially of pathogenic organisms, the use of each of these methods should be confirmed by another method, preferably sequencing.
肠杆菌目是一个普遍存在的菌目,栖息于包括食物在内的各种环境中。由于致病菌种和非致病菌种之间高度相似,它们的鉴定可能困难且费力,因此需要快速而精确的鉴定方法。本研究的目的是比较从新鲜鱼虾中分离出的肠杆菌目菌株(n = 62)的现有鉴定方法的有效性。本研究使用了以下方法:生化鉴定、测序以及使用基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)进行鉴定。为此,使用EnteroTest 24N试剂盒进行生化鉴定,而使用MALDI-TOF MS技术的鉴定则在VITEK MS上进行。将结果与通过16S rRNA测序进行的鉴定结果进行比较。研究结果表明,传统鉴定方法可能会给出错误结果。通过VITEK MS鉴定到种水平的正确率为70.97%,EnteroTest 24N鉴定的准确率不超过50.0%。MALDI-TOF技术鉴定属的准确率达到90.32%,而EnteroTest 24N的准确率接近70.0%。由于鉴定存在误差,尤其是对致病生物的鉴定,每种方法的使用都应通过另一种方法(最好是测序)进行验证。