• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信任有助于提高居民对备灾效果的认知吗?来自中国四川省汶川和芦山地震的证据。

Does Trust Help to Improve Residents' Perceptions of the Efficacy of Disaster Preparedness? Evidence from Wenchuan and Lushan Earthquakes in Sichuan Province, China.

机构信息

College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.

College of Economics, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 8;19(8):4515. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084515.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19084515
PMID:35457385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9026386/
Abstract

Disaster preparation can reduce the impact of an earthquake on residents. Residents are more likely to undertake disaster preparedness if they perceive it to be effective. However, few studies have analyzed the influence of trust on this perception. This study surveyed 327 households in areas stricken by the Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes to explore these issues. Trust was divided into government trust, emotional trust, and social trust, while the efficacy of disaster preparedness was divided into self-efficacy and response efficacy. A partial least squares structural equation model was used to explore the influence of trust on perceptions of the efficacy of disaster preparedness. The results show that: (1) government trust can directly increase perceived efficacy and indirectly increase self-efficacy via emotional trust; (2) emotional trust can directly increase self-efficacy; (3) social trust can directly reduce self-efficacy while indirectly increasing it by increasing emotional trust. This study deepens our understanding of the relationship between trust and perceptions of the efficacy of disaster preparedness. This study can provide inspiration to improve risk communication and construct systems of community-based disaster-prevention.

摘要

灾难准备可以减轻地震对居民的影响。如果居民认为灾难准备有效,他们更有可能进行灾难准备。然而,很少有研究分析信任对这种看法的影响。本研究调查了汶川和芦山地震灾区的 327 户家庭,以探讨这些问题。信任分为政府信任、情感信任和社会信任,而灾难准备的效果分为自我效能和反应效能。采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型探讨信任对灾难准备效果感知的影响。结果表明:(1)政府信任可以通过情感信任直接增加感知效能,并间接增加自我效能;(2)情感信任可以直接增加自我效能;(3)社会信任可以直接降低自我效能,同时通过增加情感信任间接增加自我效能。本研究深化了我们对信任与灾难准备效果感知之间关系的理解。本研究可为改善风险沟通和构建基于社区的防灾系统提供启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/9026386/9cb9789155a2/ijerph-19-04515-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/9026386/9cb9789155a2/ijerph-19-04515-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/9026386/9cb9789155a2/ijerph-19-04515-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Does Trust Help to Improve Residents' Perceptions of the Efficacy of Disaster Preparedness? Evidence from Wenchuan and Lushan Earthquakes in Sichuan Province, China.信任有助于提高居民对备灾效果的认知吗?来自中国四川省汶川和芦山地震的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 8;19(8):4515. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084515.
2
Financial Preparation, Disaster Experience, and Disaster Risk Perception of Rural Households in Earthquake-Stricken Areas: Evidence From the Wenchuan and Lushan Earthquakes in China's Sichuan Province.震区农村家庭的财务准备、灾害经历与灾害风险认知——来自中国四川省汶川和芦山地震的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 11;16(18):3345. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183345.
3
Community Disaster Resilience and Risk Perception in Earthquake-Stricken Areas of China.中国地震灾区的社区灾害恢复力与风险认知
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Mar 16;17:e74. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.342.
4
Media Exposure, Disaster Experience, and Risk Perception of Rural Households in Earthquake-Stricken Areas: Evidence from Rural China.媒体接触、灾难经历与地震灾区农村家庭的风险感知——来自中国农村的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 6;17(9):3246. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093246.
5
Differences in the Disaster-Preparedness Behaviors of the General Public and Professionals: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China.公众和专业人员在灾害准备行为上的差异:来自中国四川省的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 21;17(14):5254. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145254.
6
Disaster Risk Perception, Sense of Pace, Evacuation Willingness, and Relocation Willingness of Rural Households in Earthquake-Stricken Areas: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China.地震灾区农户灾害风险感知、时间感、避险意愿和搬迁意愿研究——来自四川省的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 17;17(2):602. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020602.
7
Social Networks, Trust, and Disaster-Risk Perceptions of Rural Residents in a Multi-Disaster Environment: Evidence from Sichuan, China.社会网络、信任与多灾环境下农村居民的灾害风险感知——来自中国四川的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 22;18(4):2106. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042106.
8
Livelihood resilience and strategies of rural residents of earthquake-threatened areas in Sichuan Province, China.中国四川省地震威胁地区农村居民的生计恢复力与策略
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2021;106(1):255-275. doi: 10.1007/s11069-020-04460-4. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
9
To stay or to move? Investigation on residents' migration intention under frequent secondary disasters in Wenchuan earthquake-stricken area.留还是走?汶川地震频发次生灾害下居民迁移意愿调查。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 1;10:920233. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.920233. eCollection 2022.
10
Rural Households' Livelihood Capital, Risk Perception, and Willingness to Purchase Earthquake Disaster Insurance: Evidence from Southwestern China.农村家庭生计资本、风险感知与地震灾害保险购买意愿——来自中国西南地区的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 23;15(7):1319. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071319.

本文引用的文献

1
Stay in Risk Area: Place Attachment, Efficacy Beliefs and Risk Coping.留在风险区:场所依恋、效能信念和风险应对。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 18;19(4):2375. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042375.
2
Social Networks, Trust, and Disaster-Risk Perceptions of Rural Residents in a Multi-Disaster Environment: Evidence from Sichuan, China.社会网络、信任与多灾环境下农村居民的灾害风险感知——来自中国四川的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 22;18(4):2106. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042106.
3
Livelihood resilience and strategies of rural residents of earthquake-threatened areas in Sichuan Province, China.
中国四川省地震威胁地区农村居民的生计恢复力与策略
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2021;106(1):255-275. doi: 10.1007/s11069-020-04460-4. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
4
Media Exposure, Disaster Experience, and Risk Perception of Rural Households in Earthquake-Stricken Areas: Evidence from Rural China.媒体接触、灾难经历与地震灾区农村家庭的风险感知——来自中国农村的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 6;17(9):3246. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093246.
5
Disaster Risk Perception, Sense of Pace, Evacuation Willingness, and Relocation Willingness of Rural Households in Earthquake-Stricken Areas: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China.地震灾区农户灾害风险感知、时间感、避险意愿和搬迁意愿研究——来自四川省的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 17;17(2):602. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020602.
6
Earthquake Disaster Risk Perception Process Model for Rural Households: A Pilot Study from Southwestern China.农户地震灾害风险感知过程模型:来自中国西南地区的初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 15;16(22):4512. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224512.
7
Financial Preparation, Disaster Experience, and Disaster Risk Perception of Rural Households in Earthquake-Stricken Areas: Evidence From the Wenchuan and Lushan Earthquakes in China's Sichuan Province.震区农村家庭的财务准备、灾害经历与灾害风险认知——来自中国四川省汶川和芦山地震的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 11;16(18):3345. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183345.
8
A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior.风险认知及其他影响防洪减灾行为因素综述。
Risk Anal. 2012 Sep;32(9):1481-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
9
The protective action decision model: theoretical modifications and additional evidence.保护行动决策模型:理论修正与额外证据。
Risk Anal. 2012 Apr;32(4):616-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
10
Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior.情绪、信任和感知风险:洪水备灾行为的情感和认知途径。
Risk Anal. 2011 Oct;31(10):1658-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01616.x. Epub 2011 Apr 7.