• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

假体或装置使用的主观反应测量:假体仿生范式问卷(PBP-Q)的验证。

Subjective Response Measurement to Prosthesis or Device Use: Validation of the Prosthetic-Bionic Paradigm Questionnaire (PBP-Q).

机构信息

Cultural Scientific Association "Metandro", 51100 Pistoia, Italy.

School of Psychoanalytic and Group Analytic Psychotherapy SPPG, 89100 Reggio Calabria, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8):4656. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084656.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19084656
PMID:35457523
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9029706/
Abstract

Many subjects with somatic pathologies or traumas in their recent anamnesis tend to experience symptoms and changes to their daily life parameters after technically successful treatment. Hence, this study aims to validate an investigation tool inspired by the prosthetic-bionic paradigm-namely, the PBP-Q-which allows for the evaluation of variation in questions relating to identity, psychosociality, and psychopathology in relation to the use of a prosthesis or device. We gathered 118 participants (68 females and 50 males) aged between 27 and 94 years (Mean = 58.42 ± 15.17). We performed both exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses on this sample. Moreover, we calculated the internal consistency for the PBP-Q scales and the total score for the questionnaire's final 26-item and 5-factor versions. The five scales are psychological well-being; interpersonal relationships; professional relationships; autonomy and safety; addictions, compulsions, and obsessions. The internal consistency is good for both the total score and the subscales. In conclusion, overall, the PBP-Q has satisfactory psychometric properties, especially considering the measure's complexity. It provides a quick and effective way to evaluate the changes that might arise after the use of a prosthesis or device and, subsequently, has implications for clinical practice.

摘要

许多有躯体病理或创伤病史的受试者,在技术上成功治疗后,往往会经历症状和日常生活参数的变化。因此,本研究旨在验证一种受假体-仿生范式启发的研究工具,即 PBP-Q,该工具可评估与使用假体或装置相关的身份、心理社会性和精神病理学问题的变化。我们收集了 118 名年龄在 27 至 94 岁之间的参与者(女性 68 名,男性 50 名,均值=58.42±15.17)。我们对该样本进行了探索性(EFA)和验证性(CFA)因子分析。此外,我们还计算了 PBP-Q 量表的内部一致性和问卷最终 26 项和 5 因素版本的总分。五个量表分别是心理幸福感、人际关系、职业关系、自主性和安全性、成瘾、强迫和痴迷。总分和分量表的内部一致性都很好。总之,总体而言,PBP-Q 具有令人满意的心理测量特性,尤其是考虑到该测量的复杂性。它提供了一种快速有效的方法来评估使用假体或装置后可能出现的变化,因此对临床实践具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8092/9029706/468bd1a58e9a/ijerph-19-04656-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8092/9029706/468bd1a58e9a/ijerph-19-04656-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8092/9029706/468bd1a58e9a/ijerph-19-04656-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Subjective Response Measurement to Prosthesis or Device Use: Validation of the Prosthetic-Bionic Paradigm Questionnaire (PBP-Q).假体或装置使用的主观反应测量:假体仿生范式问卷(PBP-Q)的验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8):4656. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084656.
2
Validation and reliability testing of the Breast-Q latissimus dorsi questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties in a Swedish population.验证和可靠性测试的乳房-Q 背阔肌问卷:跨文化适应和心理测量特性在瑞典人群。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jul 3;19(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01812-x.
3
Psychometric Evaluation of the Hypogonadism Impact of Symptoms Questionnaire Short Form (HIS-Q-SF).性腺功能减退症状问卷简表(HIS-Q-SF)的心理测量学评估
J Sex Med. 2017 Aug;14(8):1046-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.05.013.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the eating disorder examination-questionnaire for bariatric surgery candidates.针对减肥手术候选人的饮食失调检查问卷的心理测量评估。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Apr;16(4):763-9. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.3. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
5
Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire.9项共同决策问卷西班牙语版本的验证
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2143-53. doi: 10.1111/hex.12183. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
6
Psychometric validation of an Assessment Questionnaire on the Perception of and Adaptation to Visual Handicap in Adults (QUEPAHVA).成人视觉障碍感知与适应评估问卷(QUEPAHVA)的心理测量学验证
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020 Dec;43(10):e341-e350. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
7
Psychometric Evaluation of the Hypogonadism Impact of Symptoms Questionnaire.性腺功能减退症状影响问卷的心理测量评估
J Sex Med. 2016 Nov;13(11):1737-1749. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
The Ostomy-Q: Development and Psychometric Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Outcomes Associated with Ostomy Appliances.造口术问卷(Ostomy-Q):一种评估与造口器具相关结果的工具的开发及心理测量学验证
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 Jan;63(1):12-22.
9
Evaluation of Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Parenting in the Italian Context: Adaptation of a French Questionnaire.意大利同性父母养育态度评估:法国问卷的改编。
J Homosex. 2020;67(4):554-576. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2018.1550328. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
10
Combination of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) analysis to study the psychometric properties of the French version of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF).结合经典测验理论(CTT)和项目反应理论(IRT)分析,研究法语版生活质量享受与满意度问卷简表(Q-LES-Q-SF)的心理测量特性。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Feb;24(2):287-93. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0772-y. Epub 2014 Aug 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Parkinson's Disease-Related Risk of Suicide and Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation: Meta-Analysis.帕金森病相关的自杀风险及深部脑刺激的作用:荟萃分析
Parkinsons Dis. 2020 Sep 27;2020:8091963. doi: 10.1155/2020/8091963. eCollection 2020.
2
Perceptual correlates of successful body-prosthesis interaction in lower limb amputees: psychometric characterisation and development of the Prosthesis Embodiment Scale.下肢截肢者成功的肢体-假体交互的知觉相关因素:假体体现量表的心理计量学特征描述和发展。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 26;10(1):14203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70828-y.
3
Is an artificial limb embodied as a hand? Brain decoding in prosthetic limb users.
作为手的义肢?义肢使用者的大脑解码。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jun 8;18(6):e3000729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000729. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
Deep Brain Stimulation: Clinical Applications.深部脑刺激:临床应用
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2018 Sep;41(3):385-394. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
5
Artificial limb representation in amputees.截肢者的假肢表示。
Brain. 2018 May 1;141(5):1422-1433. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy054.
6
WHAT ARE USER PERSPECTIVES OF EXOSKELETON TECHNOLOGY? A LITERATURE REVIEW.外骨骼技术的用户观点是什么?文献回顾。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(2):160-167. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317000460.
7
The Role of Prosthesis Spacer for Ocular Prostheses.义眼台假体间隔物的作用
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jun;28(4):e360-e363. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003657.
8
[Psychological evaluation and support in patients with left ventricular assist devices: preliminary data at 6-month follow-up].[左心室辅助装置患者的心理评估与支持:6个月随访的初步数据]
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2016 Nov;17(11):940-946. doi: 10.1714/2498.26204.
9
The embodiment of assistive devices-from wheelchair to exoskeleton.辅助设备的体现——从轮椅到外骨骼。
Phys Life Rev. 2016 Mar;16:163-75. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
10
Forearm amputees' views of prosthesis use and sensory feedback.前臂截肢者对假肢使用和感觉反馈的看法。
J Hand Ther. 2015 Jul-Sep;28(3):269-77; quiz 278. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2015.01.013. Epub 2015 Feb 9.