• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估主动和被动安全措施在防止船舶碰撞桥梁中的有效性。

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Active and Passive Safety Measures in Preventing Ship-Bridge Collision.

机构信息

Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315832, China.

Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 8;22(8):2857. doi: 10.3390/s22082857.

DOI:10.3390/s22082857
PMID:35458842
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9025040/
Abstract

The risk of ship-bridge collisions should be evaluated using advanced models to consider different anti-collision and bridge-protection measures. This study aimed to propose a method to evaluate the effectiveness of active and passive safety measures in preventing ship-bridge collision. A novel ship-bridge collision probability formulation taking into consideration different safety measures was proposed. The model was applied at Jintang Bridge in China where the surrounding vessel traffic is ultra-crowded. We calculated the collision probability between the bridge and passing traffic using automatic identification system (AIS) data, Monte Carlo simulation, and Bayesian networks. Results under four different safety measures (i.e., active measures, passive measures, both measures and none) were analyzed and compared. The analysis concluded that both active and passive safety measures are effective in reducing the ship-bridge collision probability. Active measures, if deployed properly, can provide protection at an equivalent level than passive measures against collision risks. However, passive measures, such as setting arresting cables, are necessary in cases where the response time of the active measures is long. The proposed method and the results obtained from the case study may be useful for robust and systematic effectiveness evaluation of safety measures in other cases worldwide.

摘要

应采用先进的模型来评估船舶与桥梁碰撞的风险,以考虑不同的防撞和桥梁保护措施。本研究旨在提出一种评估主动和被动安全措施在防止船舶与桥梁碰撞中的有效性的方法。提出了一种考虑不同安全措施的新的船舶与桥梁碰撞概率公式。该模型应用于中国金塘大桥,该桥周围的船舶交通非常拥挤。我们使用自动识别系统(AIS)数据、蒙特卡罗模拟和贝叶斯网络计算了桥梁与过往交通之间的碰撞概率。分析并比较了四种不同安全措施(即主动措施、被动措施、两者都有和两者都没有)下的结果。分析得出,主动和被动安全措施都能有效降低船舶与桥梁碰撞的概率。如果主动措施部署得当,可以提供与被动措施相当的防撞保护水平。然而,在主动措施的响应时间较长的情况下,设置拦截电缆等被动措施是必要的。所提出的方法和案例研究中获得的结果可能对全球其他情况下安全措施的稳健和系统的有效性评估有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/0a6e1e34c118/sensors-22-02857-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/700d2c847c63/sensors-22-02857-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/bc1ae0a40e4a/sensors-22-02857-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/2d992f9c73ac/sensors-22-02857-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/0669ce26b83d/sensors-22-02857-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/d7988cb45de0/sensors-22-02857-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/dfa05296cd98/sensors-22-02857-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/7237803dc1b0/sensors-22-02857-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/dcc4c8e92c82/sensors-22-02857-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/45062161bd8b/sensors-22-02857-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/d75c4c98cf59/sensors-22-02857-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/d8acfd6267c5/sensors-22-02857-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/0a6e1e34c118/sensors-22-02857-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/700d2c847c63/sensors-22-02857-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/bc1ae0a40e4a/sensors-22-02857-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/2d992f9c73ac/sensors-22-02857-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/0669ce26b83d/sensors-22-02857-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/d7988cb45de0/sensors-22-02857-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/dfa05296cd98/sensors-22-02857-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/7237803dc1b0/sensors-22-02857-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/dcc4c8e92c82/sensors-22-02857-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/45062161bd8b/sensors-22-02857-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/d75c4c98cf59/sensors-22-02857-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/d8acfd6267c5/sensors-22-02857-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebef/9025040/0a6e1e34c118/sensors-22-02857-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Active and Passive Safety Measures in Preventing Ship-Bridge Collision.评估主动和被动安全措施在防止船舶碰撞桥梁中的有效性。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 8;22(8):2857. doi: 10.3390/s22082857.
2
A comprehensive method for causation analysis of ship-ice collision risk in Arctic waters.北极水域船舶冰碰撞风险的综合成因分析方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jun;31(28):40366-40382. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28249-7. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
3
A study on ship collision conflict prediction in the Taiwan Strait using the EMD-based LSSVM method.基于 EMD 的 LSSVM 方法在台湾海峡船舶碰撞冲突预测中的研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 10;16(5):e0250948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250948. eCollection 2021.
4
A collision model for safety evaluation of autonomous intelligent cruise control.用于自主智能巡航控制安全评估的碰撞模型
Accid Anal Prev. 1999 Sep;31(5):567-78. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00013-5.
5
Reducing whale-ship collisions by better estimating damages to ships.通过更好地估计船舶损失来减少鲸船碰撞。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 15;713:136643. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136643. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
6
Ship collision risk assessment for the Singapore Strait.新加坡海峡船舶碰撞风险评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Nov;43(6):2030-2036. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.022. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
7
The Application of Automatic Identification System Information and PSO-LSTM Neural Network in CRI Prediction.自动识别系统信息与 PSOLSTM 神经网络在 CRI 预测中的应用。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Mar 24;2022:8699322. doi: 10.1155/2022/8699322. eCollection 2022.
8
A Formal and Visual Data-Mining Model for Complex Ship Behaviors and Patterns.复杂船舶行为和模式的正式和可视化数据挖掘模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jul 14;22(14):5281. doi: 10.3390/s22145281.
9
Deep Learning-Based Caution Area Traffic Prediction with Automatic Identification System Sensor Data.基于深度学习的自动识别系统传感器数据的警戒区交通预测。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Sep 19;18(9):3172. doi: 10.3390/s18093172.
10
Application of naïve Bayesian approach in detecting reproducible fatal collision locations on freeway.朴素贝叶斯方法在高速公路可重现致命碰撞位置检测中的应用。
PLoS One. 2021 May 18;16(5):e0251866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251866. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Automatic Identification System (AIS) Dynamic Data Integrity Monitoring and Trajectory Tracking Based on the Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) Process Model.基于同时定位与建图 (SLAM) 过程模型的自动识别系统 (AIS) 动态数据完整性监测和轨迹跟踪。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 17;21(24):8430. doi: 10.3390/s21248430.
2
Modeling ship transportation risk.
Risk Anal. 2000 Apr;20(2):225-44. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.202022.