Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, 1 Hospital Boulevard, Southport Queensland, 4215, Australia.
Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03333-7.
Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) commonly use journal clubs (JCs) to support Evidence-Based Practice (EBP). There is however little research regarding implementing and sustaining JCs in the long term, and their impact on EBP use and skills in AHPs. This study investigated the impact of implementing a structured JC format, called "TREAT" (previously only investigated across 6 sessions), over a longer period of 16 sessions for AHPs in a public health service. The study also investigated AHP's attendance, adherence, satisfaction and barriers and enablers to implementing the format.
A mixed methods hybrid-effectiveness implementation design was employed, guided by the Knowledge-to-Action cycle. EBP skills, confidence, use, and attitudes were assessed (Adapted Fresno Test, EBPQ, tailored journal club culture questionnaire) at baseline, and after 10 and 16-monthly sessions. Satisfaction and impact on clinical practice were explored using questionnaires at 10 and 16-months, with free-form responses identifying enablers and barriers to EBP culture and implementation. Data on attendance and adherence to the TREAT format were also collected.
Six JCs comprising a total of 132 unique participants from seven Allied Health professions were assessed across three time points. EBP skills improved on the Adapted Fresno Test after 10-monthly (6.6 points: 95% CI, 0.43 to 12.7) and 16-monthly sessions (7.8 points, 95% CI, 0.85 to 14.7), and on self-reported total EBPQ ratings of confidence at 10-months (4.9 points: 95% CI, 2.2 to 7.5) and 16-months (5.7 points: 95% CI 2.7 to 8.7). Of 132 AHPs, 88 reported adopting new treatments/resources and 64 reported updating clinical procedures. Mean attendance was 5.7 sessions (SD = 3.8). Adherence to TREAT components in each session was 86% (95% CI, 83% to 89%). Most participants recommended the format and reported a desire to continue. Enablers to the JC included using clinically relevant topics and active participation while reported barriers included limited time to prepare.
Despite variable attendance, TREAT JCs can continue to be implemented within a service for 16 monthly-sessions, and may contribute to improved EBP skills and confidence and changes in clinical practice over time. Tailoring of implementation strategies was shown to be important to address local enablers and barriers.
辅助医疗专业人员(AHPs)通常使用期刊俱乐部(JCs)来支持循证实践(EBP)。然而,关于长期实施和维持 JCs 及其对 AHPs 的 EBP 使用和技能的影响的研究很少。本研究调查了在公共卫生服务中为 AHPs 实施一种名为“TREAT”的结构化 JC 格式(以前仅在 6 个会话中进行过调查)的影响,该格式的实施时间超过了 16 个会话。该研究还调查了 AHP 的出勤率、坚持度、满意度以及实施该格式的障碍和促进因素。
采用混合方法混合有效性实施设计,以知识转化周期为指导。在基线、10 个月和 16 个月时评估 EBP 技能、信心、使用和态度(适应性弗雷斯诺测试、EBPQ、量身定制的期刊俱乐部文化问卷)。在 10 个月和 16 个月时使用问卷探索满意度和对临床实践的影响,并通过自由格式的回复确定 EBP 文化和实施的障碍和促进因素。还收集了关于 TREAT 格式的出勤率和坚持度的数据。
在三个时间点评估了来自七个辅助医疗专业的总共 132 名独特参与者的六个 JC。10 个月(6.6 分:95%CI,0.43 至 12.7)和 16 个月(7.8 分:95%CI,0.85 至 14.7)后,适应性弗雷斯诺测试上的 EBP 技能提高,10 个月(4.9 分:95%CI,2.2 至 7.5)和 16 个月(5.7 分:95%CI 2.7 至 8.7)时,自我报告的 EBPQ 总信心评分也有所提高。在 132 名 AHPs 中,88 名报告采用了新的治疗方法/资源,64 名报告更新了临床程序。平均出勤率为 5.7 节课(SD=3.8)。每次会议中 TREAT 成分的坚持度为 86%(95%CI,83%至 89%)。大多数参与者推荐该格式,并表示希望继续使用。JC 的促进因素包括使用临床相关主题和积极参与,而报告的障碍包括准备时间有限。
尽管出勤率存在差异,但 TREAT JCs 仍可在服务中实施 16 个月度课程,并且随着时间的推移,可能有助于提高 EBP 技能和信心,并改变临床实践。实施策略的调整被证明对解决当地的促进因素和障碍很重要。