Suppr超能文献

评估医学生循证实践能力的问卷的巴西葡萄牙语版本:翻译、跨文化调适及测量特性

Brazilian Portuguese version of questionnaires assessing evidence-based practice competencies in healthcare students: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties.

作者信息

Nunes Guilherme S, Rodrigues Diênifer Zilmer, Ruzafa-Martinez Maria, Upton Penney, da Luz Clarissa Medeiros, Romaguera Fernanda, Dangui Anna Julia M, Wageck Bruna

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Av. Roraima, 1000, Santa Maria, RS CEP 97105-900, Brazil.

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Av. Roraima, 1000, Santa Maria, RS CEP 97105-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Phys Ther. 2024 Nov-Dec;28(6):101140. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101140. Epub 2024 Nov 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While several instruments assess evidence-based practice (EBP) competencies, few are available for the Brazilian population, particularly healthcare students.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a cross-cultural translation of the Student Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (S-EBPQ) and Evidence-Based Practice Evaluation Competence Questionnaire (EBP-COQ) into Brazilian Portuguese; to adapt and validate the Brazilian Portuguese versions for use with healthcare students from diverse courses; and to assess the measurement properties of the translated and adapted versions.

METHODS

Four hundred forty-two healthcare students were included, and three versions were tested: S-EBPQ-BR, EBP-COQ-BR for nursing students, and EBP-COQ-BR for healthcare students. We assessed internal consistency, reliability, construct validity, responsiveness, and ceiling/floor effects. For reliability, participants completed the questionnaires twice, one week apart. For responsiveness, they completed them after participating in an educational program.

RESULTS

No issues were identified with understanding or applicability. For overall scores, the translated questionnaires demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.87-0.92), good to moderate reliability (ICC=0.63-0.88), construct validity with moderate to very strong correlations to the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (r=0.43-0.89), no ceiling or floor effects, and adequate responsiveness with significant pre- and post-educational program score differences. For subscales, the majority of them demonstrated satisfactory measurement properties, except for S-EBPQ-BR attitude (low internal consistency, poor reliability, and ceiling effect), EBP-COQ attitude (inadequate construct validity), and EBP-COQ skills (inadequate construct validity).

CONCLUSION

The Brazilian Portuguese versions of S-EBPQ and EBP-COQ exhibit strong measurement properties, including high internal consistency, adequate reliability, valid construct validity, and responsiveness. However, some subscales present suboptimal internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity.

摘要

背景

虽然有几种工具可用于评估循证实践(EBP)能力,但针对巴西人群,尤其是医学生的工具却很少。

目的

将学生循证实践问卷(S-EBPQ)和循证实践评估能力问卷(EBP-COQ)跨文化翻译为巴西葡萄牙语;对巴西葡萄牙语版本进行改编和验证,以便供不同课程的医学生使用;并评估翻译和改编版本的测量属性。

方法

纳入442名医学生,并测试了三个版本:S-EBPQ-BR、护理专业学生的EBP-COQ-BR以及其他医学生的EBP-COQ-BR。我们评估了内部一致性、可靠性、结构效度、反应性以及天花板/地板效应。为评估可靠性,参与者相隔一周填写两次问卷。为评估反应性,他们在参加一个教育项目后填写问卷。

结果

在理解或适用性方面未发现问题。对于总体得分,翻译后的问卷显示出很强的内部一致性(Cronbach'sα=0.87-0.92)、良好到中等的可靠性(ICC=0.63-0.88)、与循证实践问卷具有中等至非常强的相关性的结构效度(r=0.43-0.89)、无天花板效应或地板效应,以及在教育项目前后得分有显著差异的充分反应性。对于分量表,除了S-EBPQ-BR态度(内部一致性低、可靠性差和天花板效应)、EBP-COQ态度(结构效度不足)和EBP-COQ技能(结构效度不足)外,大多数分量表都表现出令人满意的测量属性。

结论

S-EBPQ和EBP-COQ的巴西葡萄牙语版本具有很强的测量属性,包括高内部一致性、充分的可靠性、有效的结构效度和反应性。然而,一些分量表的内部一致性、可靠性和结构效度欠佳。

相似文献

8
Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation, and Clinimetric Testing of Instruments Used to Assess Patients With Ankle Sprain in the Brazilian Population.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Dec;46(12):1042-1050. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6218. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
9
Development and Validation of the Dutch EBPAS-ve and EBPQ-ve for Nursing Assistants and Nurses with a Vocational Education.
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2019 Oct;16(5):371-380. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12389. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement properties of Pain Catastrophizing Scale in individuals with chronic shoulder pain.
Braz J Phys Ther. 2025 May-Jun;29(3):101206. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101206. Epub 2025 Apr 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving the reliability of measurements in orthopaedics and sports medicine.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5277-5285. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07635-1. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
4
Promoting Evidence-Based Practice: The Influence of Novel Structural Change to Accelerate Translational Rehabilitation.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Aug;104(8):1289-1299. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.02.014. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
5
Sample size in quantitative instrument validation studies: A systematic review of articles published in Scopus, 2021.
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 12;8(12):e12223. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12223. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
TRANSLATION AND VALIDATION OF ENGLISH VERSION OF EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE COMPETENCE QUESTIONNAIRE.
J Nurs Meas. 2023 Mar 1;31(1):89-95. doi: 10.1891/JNM-2021-0010. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
10
Cultural validation of the competence in evidence-based practice questionnaire (EBP-COQ) for nursing students.
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Dec 31;10:464. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1534_20. eCollection 2021.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验