• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同目标导向下愤怒的调节特性:规范目标和结果目标的影响。

The regulatory properties of anger under different goal orientations: the effects of normative and outcome goals.

机构信息

Department of Educational Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Department of Psychology, College of Arts, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif, 21944, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2022 Apr 22;10(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00815-7.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-022-00815-7
PMID:35459190
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9027722/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to evaluate the self-regulatory properties of anger on the performance of individuals under various motivational dispositions using an experimental design.

METHODS

The participants were 99 university students who participated in response to extra credit. The performance of the participants was evaluated using the Tower of Hanoi task. Their anger was measured using a facial expression recognition system and arousal was assessed using a heart-rate monitoring device. Two motivational dispositions were assessed: performance goals with normative evaluative standards and performance goals with a focus on outcomes.

RESULTS

The results indicated that a nonlinear function explained the relationship between anger, arousal, and achievement under different goal conditions. Specifically, the Cusp Catastrophe Model showed that anger levels beyond a critical point were associated with the unpredictability of performance during the normative goal condition, suggesting that anger disturbed the relationship between arousal and achievement. Interestingly, a linear model was relevant for explaining the same relationships during the outcome goal condition.

CONCLUSION

Thus, this study concluded that anger plays a more salient role when coupled with the pressures arising from employing interpersonal evaluative standards.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在采用实验设计,评估愤怒情绪在不同动机倾向下对个体表现的自我调节特性。

方法

99 名大学生参与了本次研究,作为额外奖励。参与者使用汉诺塔任务来评估其表现。通过面部表情识别系统测量他们的愤怒,使用心率监测设备评估他们的唤醒水平。评估了两种动机倾向:具有规范性评价标准的绩效目标和关注结果的绩效目标。

结果

结果表明,愤怒、唤醒和成就之间的关系可以用一个非线性函数来解释,在不同的目标条件下。具体来说,尖点突变模型表明,在规范性目标条件下,愤怒水平超过临界点与表现的不可预测性有关,这表明愤怒扰乱了唤醒和成就之间的关系。有趣的是,线性模型对于解释在结果目标条件下的相同关系是相关的。

结论

因此,本研究得出结论,当愤怒与人际评价标准带来的压力结合在一起时,它会发挥更显著的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b81f/9027722/08f63228e64c/40359_2022_815_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b81f/9027722/9b612d97c51d/40359_2022_815_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b81f/9027722/f74f9d6510f4/40359_2022_815_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b81f/9027722/698f4d3c97a8/40359_2022_815_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b81f/9027722/08f63228e64c/40359_2022_815_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b81f/9027722/9b612d97c51d/40359_2022_815_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b81f/9027722/f74f9d6510f4/40359_2022_815_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b81f/9027722/698f4d3c97a8/40359_2022_815_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b81f/9027722/08f63228e64c/40359_2022_815_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The regulatory properties of anger under different goal orientations: the effects of normative and outcome goals.不同目标导向下愤怒的调节特性:规范目标和结果目标的影响。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Apr 22;10(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00815-7.
2
Relationship between achievement goal orientations and perceived motivational climate on intrinsic motivation.成就目标导向与内在动机的感知动机氛围之间的关系。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1999 Dec;9(6):365-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.1999.tb00258.x.
3
Reading Achievement, Mastery, and Performance Goal Structures Among Students With Learning Disabilities: A Nonlinear Perspective.学习障碍学生的阅读成就、掌握和成绩目标结构:非线性视角
J Learn Disabil. 2016 Nov;49(6):631-643. doi: 10.1177/0022219415576524. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
4
Motivational school climate and teachers' achievement goal orientations: A hierarchical approach.动机性学校氛围与教师的成就目标取向:一种层级方法。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2021 Mar;91(1):391-408. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12370. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
5
On the nature of motivational orientations: implications of assessed goals and gender differences for motivational goal theory.关于动机取向的本质:评估目标和性别差异对动机目标理论的启示。
Span J Psychol. 2010 May;13(1):232-43. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600003814.
6
Using goal orientations to understand motivation in strength training.运用目标导向来理解力量训练中的动机。
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jul;22(4):1169-75. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318173c566.
7
Can achievement goal theory provide a useful motivational perspective for explaining psychosocial attributes of medical students?成就目标理论能否为解释医学生的心理社会特征提供有用的动机视角?
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Jan 12;12:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-4.
8
Goal priming and the emotional experience of students with and without attention problems: an application of the emotional stroop task.目标启动与有无注意力问题学生的情绪体验:情绪斯特鲁普任务的一项应用
J Learn Disabil. 2009 Mar-Apr;42(2):177-89. doi: 10.1177/0022219408331034.
9
College Students' Physical Activity and Health-Related Quality of Life: An Achievement Goal Perspective.大学生的体育活动与健康相关生活质量:成就目标视角
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2016 Jun;87(2):182-90. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2016.1159279. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
10
Type of goals and perceived control for goal achievement over time. The mediating role of motivational persistence.随着时间推移,目标类型与对目标达成的感知控制。动机持续性的中介作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Nov;231:103776. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103776. Epub 2022 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Culture, goal orientation and achievement of vocational college students.高职院校学生的文化、目标导向与成就
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 22;16:1639938. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1639938. eCollection 2025.
2
Catastrophe Theory Applied to Neuropsychological Data: Nonlinear Effects of Depression on Financial Capacity in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.突变理论应用于神经心理学数据:抑郁症对遗忘型轻度认知障碍和痴呆症患者财务能力的非线性影响。
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Aug 7;24(8):1089. doi: 10.3390/e24081089.

本文引用的文献

1
The Stressful Experience of Goal Orientations Under Frustration: Evidence Using Physiological Means.挫折情境下目标导向的压力体验:基于生理手段的证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 13;13:823655. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.823655. eCollection 2022.
2
Why Do People Regulate Their Emotions? A Taxonomy of Motives in Emotion Regulation.人们为什么要调节情绪?情绪调节动机的分类学。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2016 Aug;20(3):199-222. doi: 10.1177/1088868315586325. Epub 2015 May 26.
3
Ought-approach versus ought-avoidance: nonlinear effects on arousal under achievement situations.
应该取向与应该回避:成就情境下对唤醒的非线性影响。
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2014 Jan;18(1):67-90.
4
Anger and shame as determinants of perceived competence.愤怒和羞耻是感知能力的决定因素。
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(6):1080-9. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2013.785634. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
5
On angry leaders and agreeable followers. How leaders' emotions and followers' personalities shape motivation and team performance.论愤怒的领导者和顺从的追随者。领导者的情绪和追随者的个性如何塑造动机和团队绩效。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Dec;21(12):1827-34. doi: 10.1177/0956797610387438. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
6
Bring it on: angry facial expressions potentiate approach-motivated motor behavior.怒容激发:愤怒的面部表情增强了趋近动机的运动行为。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Feb;98(2):201-10. doi: 10.1037/a0017992.
7
Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications.愤怒是一种与趋近相关的情感:证据及启示。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;135(2):183-204. doi: 10.1037/a0013965.
8
Business or pleasure? Utilitarian versus hedonic considerations in emotion regulation.出于功利还是享乐?情绪调节中的功利性与享乐性考量
Emotion. 2007 Aug;7(3):546-54. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.546.
9
Effortful control as modifier of the association between negative emotionality and adolescents' mental health problems.努力控制作为消极情绪与青少年心理健康问题之间关联的调节因素。
Dev Psychopathol. 2007 Spring;19(2):523-39. doi: 10.1017/S0954579407070253.
10
Don't worry, be happy? Neuroticism, trait-consistent affect regulation, and performance.别担心,要开心?神经质、特质一致的情绪调节与表现。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Sep;89(3):449-61. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.449.