HealthPartners Institute, Research and Evaluation Division, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
J Psychosom Res. 2022 Jul;158:110920. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110920. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
This study assessed the relationship of both depression diagnosis and clinically significant depressive symptoms with individual cardiovascular risk factors and estimated total cardiovascular risk in primary care patients.
This study used a cross-sectional and retrospective design. Patients who had a primary care encounter between January 2016 and September 2018 and completed depression screening (PHQ-9) during the year prior to their appointment (N = 70,980) were included in this study. Data examining estimated total cardiovascular risk, specific cardiovascular risk factors, and relevant clinical diagnoses (including depression diagnosis) were extracted from the electronic health record. Patients were categorized into three groups: no depression (PHQ-9 < 10 and no depression diagnosis), controlled depression (PHQ-9 < 10 with previous depression diagnosis), and current depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). Groups were compared on estimated total risk and specific cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., body mass index [BMI], smoking status, lipids, blood pressure, and glucose).
In adjusted analyses, patients with current depression (n = 18,267) demonstrated significantly higher 10-year and 30-year cardiovascular risk compared to patients with controlled depression (n = 33,383; 10-year: b = 0.59 [95% CI = 0.44,0.74]; 30-year: OR = 1.32 [95% CI = 1.26,1.39]) and patients without depression (n = 19,330; 10-year: b = 0.55 [95% CI = 0.37,0.73]; 30-year: OR = 1.56 [95% CI = 1.48,1.65]). Except for low-density lipoprotein (LDL), patients with current depression had the greatest cardiovascular risk across specific risk factors.
Individuals who had a depression diagnosis and clinically significant depressive symptoms had the greatest cardiovascular risk. Pathways to prevent cardiovascular disease in those with depression might focus on treating depressive symptoms as well as specific uncontrolled cardiovascular risk factors.
本研究评估了抑郁诊断和有临床意义的抑郁症状与个体心血管危险因素的关系,并估算了初级保健患者的总体心血管风险。
本研究采用了横断面和回顾性设计。纳入了 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 9 月期间有初级保健就诊经历且在就诊前 1 年内完成抑郁筛查(PHQ-9)的患者(N=70980)。从电子健康记录中提取了关于估计的总体心血管风险、特定心血管危险因素和相关临床诊断(包括抑郁诊断)的数据。患者分为三组:无抑郁(PHQ-9<10 且无抑郁诊断)、抑郁控制组(PHQ-9<10 且有抑郁诊断)和当前抑郁组(PHQ-9≥10)。比较了三组患者的估计总风险和特定心血管危险因素(如体重指数[BMI]、吸烟状况、血脂、血压和血糖)。
在调整分析中,当前抑郁组(n=18267)患者的 10 年和 30 年心血管风险显著高于抑郁控制组(n=33383;10 年:b=0.59[95%CI=0.44,0.74];30 年:OR=1.32[95%CI=1.26,1.39])和无抑郁组(n=19330;10 年:b=0.55[95%CI=0.37,0.73];30 年:OR=1.56[95%CI=1.48,1.65])。除了低密度脂蛋白(LDL),当前抑郁组在所有特定危险因素中具有最高的心血管风险。
有抑郁诊断和有临床意义的抑郁症状的个体具有最大的心血管风险。预防抑郁患者心血管疾病的途径可能侧重于治疗抑郁症状以及特定的未得到控制的心血管危险因素。