Olszewska-Guizzo Agnieszka, Fogel Anna, Escoffier Nicolas, Sia Angelia, Nakazawa Kenta, Kumagai Akihiro, Dan Ippeita, Ho Roger
Institute for Health Innovation & Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
NeuroLandscape Foundation, Warsaw, Poland.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 7;13:757056. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.757056. eCollection 2022.
The therapeutic values of contact with nature have been increasingly recognized. A growing body of evidence suggests that a unique subcategory of "contemplative landscapes" is particularly therapeutic. Previous studies predominantly focused on observational designs in non-clinical populations. It is not known if these effects can be extrapolated to populations suffering from depression, and experimental designs need to be utilized to establish causality. We examined the effects of passive exposure to three urban spaces on brain activity, namely a Therapeutic Garden with high Contemplative Landscape scores (TG), Residential Green (RG) and Busy Downtown (BD), and self-reported momentary mood in adults aged 21-74 ( = 92), including 24 clinically depressed and 68 healthy participants. Portable, multimodal electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) systems were used to record brain activity, and a Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire was used to record mood before and after exposure. We tested the interactions between the site, time and group for the mood, and between site and group for the neuroelectric oscillations and brain hemodynamics. Self-reported pre- post-mood was significant only at the TG ( = 0.032) in both groups. The lowest Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) was reported at TG and the highest in BD ( = 0.026). Results from fNIRS indicated marginally significant lower oxy-Hb in the frontal region at TG as compared to BD ( = 0.054) across both groups. The marginally significant effect of site and group was also observed ( = 0.062), with the Clinical group showing much lower oxy-Hb at TG than Healthy. The opposite pattern was observed at BD. EEG results showed differences between Healthy and Clinical groups in the Frontal Alpha Asymmetry (FAA) pattern across the sites ( = 0.04), with more frontal alpha right in the Clinical sample and more left lateralization in the Healthy sample at TG. Temporal Beta Asymmetry (TBA) analyses suggested that patients displayed lower bottom-up attention than Healthy participants across all sites ( = 0.039). The results suggest that both healthy and depressed adults benefitted from exposure to TG, with possibly different pathways of mood improvement. Visiting therapeutic nature with contemplative features may provide valuable support for the treatment of depression in clinical populations and a self-care intervention in non-clinical populations.
接触自然的治疗价值已得到越来越多的认可。越来越多的证据表明,一种独特的“冥想景观”子类具有特别的治疗作用。以往的研究主要集中在非临床人群的观察性设计上。尚不清楚这些效果是否能外推至抑郁症患者群体,因此需要采用实验性设计来确定因果关系。我们研究了被动接触三个城市空间对21至74岁成年人(n = 92)大脑活动的影响,这三个空间分别是具有高冥想景观分数的治疗花园(TG)、住宅绿地(RG)和繁忙的市中心(BD),同时还研究了自我报告的瞬时情绪,其中包括24名临床抑郁症患者和68名健康参与者。使用便携式多模态脑电图(EEG)和功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)系统记录大脑活动,并使用情绪状态剖面图(POMS)问卷记录接触前后的情绪。我们测试了场所、时间和组别之间在情绪方面的相互作用,以及场所和组别之间在神经电振荡和脑血流动力学方面的相互作用。两组的自我报告的接触前后情绪变化仅在TG处有显著差异(p = 0.032)。报告的总情绪紊乱(TMD)在TG处最低,在BD处最高(p = 0.026)。fNIRS的结果表明,与BD相比,两组在TG处额叶区域的氧合血红蛋白(oxy-Hb)略低(p = 0.054)。场所和组别也有边缘显著效应(p = 0.062),临床组在TG处的oxy-Hb比健康组低得多。在BD处观察到相反的模式。EEG结果显示,在各个场所,健康组和临床组在额叶阿尔法不对称(FAA)模式上存在差异(p = 0.04),在TG处,临床样本中额叶阿尔法更多地出现在右侧,而健康样本中更多地向左半球侧化。颞叶贝塔不对称(TBA)分析表明,在所有场所,患者表现出的自下而上注意力均低于健康参与者(p = 0.039)。结果表明,健康成年人和抑郁症成年人都从接触TG中受益,情绪改善的途径可能不同。参观具有冥想特征的治疗性自然环境可能为临床人群的抑郁症治疗和非临床人群的自我护理干预提供有价值的支持。