Lennette E T, Karpatkin S, Levy J A
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Feb;25(2):199-202. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.2.199-202.1987.
We compared an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) with a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) screening procedure for the detection of antibodies to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The IFA assay was as sensitive and specific as the ELISA. No false results were observed with IFA on single testing of 181 sera, while the ELISA produced five false-positive results which required retesting for resolution. In addition, the IFA was suitable for quantitation of anti-HIV responses. The IFA was superior to the ELISA for its reliability, simplicity, and rapidity in the diagnostic laboratory.
我们将间接免疫荧光测定法(IFA)与一种商用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)筛查程序进行了比较,以检测人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)抗体。IFA测定法与ELISA一样灵敏和特异。对181份血清进行单次检测时,IFA未观察到假结果,而ELISA产生了5例假阳性结果,需要重新检测以解决。此外,IFA适用于抗HIV反应的定量。在诊断实验室中,IFA在可靠性、简便性和快速性方面优于ELISA。