Jiménez-Blanco Bravo Marta, Pérez-Gómez Laura, Hernández-Pérez Francisco J, Arellano-Serrano Carlos, Torres-Sanabria Mario, Gómez-Bueno Manuel, Oteo-Domínguez Juan F, Mingo-Santos Susana, Segovia-Cubero Javier
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 6;9:856600. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.856600. eCollection 2022.
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality among long-term heart transplant recipients. There is an unmet need for a non-invasive biomarker of CAV that could obviate the need to perform surveillance coronary angiograms in these patients. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of Donor-derived Cell Free DNA (dd-cfDNA) as a biomarker of CAV.
We prospectively measured dd-cfDNA levels in all patients undergoing routine coronary angiography >1 year after heart transplant at a single center. Endpoints included the association between dd-cfDNA levels and the presence CAV, according to several prespecified criteria.
We included 94 heart transplant recipients, a median of 10.9 years after transplant. Coronary angiogram revealed CAV, CAV, CAV, and CAV in 61, 19, 14, and 6% of patients, respectively. Comparison of dd-cfDNA levels in patients with CAV and CAV (primary end-point) did not show significant differences (0.92%, IQR 0.46-2.0 vs. 0.46%, IQR 0.075-1.5, = 0.059), nor did the comparison between patients with stable CAV (no new coronary lesions since previous angiogram, = 77) and progressive CAV ( = 17); dd-cfDNA values 0.735% (IQR 0.195-2.0) vs. 0.9% (IQR 0.12-1.8), = 0.76. However, we found an association between NTproBNP levels and CAV degree ( = 0.017). Dd-cfDNA levels did not correlate with NTproBNP (ρ = -0.095).
In this study, dd-cfDNA did not perform as a useful biomarker to avoid surveillance coronary angiograms for CAV diagnosis.
Potential Role of Donor-derived Cell Free DNA as a Biomarker in Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy, NCT04791852.
心脏移植血管病变(CAV)仍然是长期心脏移植受者发病和死亡的主要原因。目前迫切需要一种CAV的非侵入性生物标志物,以避免对这些患者进行冠状动脉造影监测。我们的目的是评估供体来源的游离DNA(dd-cfDNA)作为CAV生物标志物的性能。
我们前瞻性地测量了在单一中心接受心脏移植1年以上的所有接受常规冠状动脉造影患者的dd-cfDNA水平。根据几个预先设定的标准,终点包括dd-cfDNA水平与CAV存在之间的关联。
我们纳入了94名心脏移植受者,移植后中位数为10.9年。冠状动脉造影显示,分别有61%、19%、14%和6%的患者存在CAV。比较CAV患者和CAV患者(主要终点)的dd-cfDNA水平,未发现显著差异(0.92%,四分位间距0.46 - 2.0 vs. 0.46%,四分位间距0.075 - 1.5,P = 0.059),稳定CAV患者(自上次血管造影以来无新的冠状动脉病变,n = 77)和进展性CAV患者(n = 17)之间的比较也未发现显著差异;dd-cfDNA值分别为0.735%(四分位间距0.195 - 2.0)和0.9%(四分位间距0.12 - 1.8),P = 0.76。然而,我们发现NTproBNP水平与CAV程度之间存在关联(P = 0.017)。dd-cfDNA水平与NTproBNP无相关性(ρ = -0.095)。
在本研究中,dd-cfDNA不能作为避免冠状动脉造影监测以诊断CAV的有用生物标志物。
供体来源的游离DNA作为心脏移植血管病变生物标志物的潜在作用,NCT04791852。