Division of Developmental Paediatrics, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2022 Aug;34(4):167-190. doi: 10.1017/neu.2022.5. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
Behavioural screening tools may be used to identify at-risk children in resource-limited settings in sub-Saharan Africa. The ASEBA forms (Child Behaviour Checklist and Youth Self-Report) are frequently translated and adapted for use in sub-Saharan African populations, but little is known about their measurement properties in these contexts.
We conducted a systematic review of all published journal articles that used the ASEBA forms with sub-Saharan African samples. We evaluated the reported psychometric properties, as well as the methodological quality of the psychometric evaluations, using COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) guidelines.
Fifty-eight studies reported measurement properties of the ASEBA forms. Most studies came from Southern ( = 29, 50%) or East African ( = 25, 43%) countries. Forty-nine studies (84%) used translated versions of the tool, but details regarding the translation process, if available, were often sparse. Most studies ( = 47, 81%) only reported internal consistency (using coefficient alpha) for one or more subscale. The methodological quality of the psychometric evaluations ranged from 'very good' to 'inadequate' across all measurement properties, except for internal consistency.
There is limited good quality psychometric evidence available for the ASEBA forms in sub-Saharan Africa. We recommend (i) implementing a standardised procedure for conducting and reporting translation processes and (ii) conducting more comprehensive psychometric evaluations of the translated versions of the tools.
行为筛查工具可用于识别撒哈拉以南非洲资源有限环境中的高危儿童。ASEBA 表格(儿童行为检查表和青年自我报告)经常被翻译并改编用于撒哈拉以南非洲人群,但这些工具在这些背景下的测量特性知之甚少。
我们对使用 ASEBA 表格的所有已发表的期刊文章进行了系统回顾,这些文章的样本来自撒哈拉以南非洲。我们使用 COSMIN(健康测量工具选择的共识标准)指南评估了报告的心理计量学特性以及心理计量学评估的方法学质量。
58 项研究报告了 ASEBA 表格的测量特性。大多数研究来自南部(= 29,50%)或东非(= 25,43%)国家。49 项研究(84%)使用了工具的翻译版本,但如果有关于翻译过程的详细信息,往往很少。大多数研究(= 47,81%)仅报告了一个或多个分量表的内部一致性(使用系数 alpha)。心理计量学评估的方法学质量在所有测量特性中均从“非常好”到“不充分”不等,内部一致性除外。
在撒哈拉以南非洲,ASEBA 表格的心理计量学证据有限且质量良好。我们建议(i)实施标准化程序,以进行和报告翻译过程;(ii)对工具的翻译版本进行更全面的心理计量学评估。