Purchase I F, Longstaff E, Ashby J, Styles J A, Anderson D, Lefevre P A, Westwood F R
Br J Cancer. 1978 Jun;37(6):873-903. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1978.132.
A number of tests have been described which are thought to be capable of identifying carcinogens without using the actual induction of cancer as an endpoint. This study compared the performance of 6 such tests on a selection of 120 organic chemicals. The tests studies were: (1) mutation of Salmonella typhimurium; (2) cell transformation; (3) degranulation of endoplasmic reticulum; (4) sebaceous gland suppression; (5) tetrazolium reduction and (6) subcutaneous implant. A further 4 tests were examined briefly, but were not included in the complete evaluation. The chemicals were classified into carcinogens (58) and non-carcinogens (62) on the basis of published experimental data, and into 1 of 4 broad chemical classes. There was considerable variation between tests in their ability to predict carcinogenicity, with the cell-transformation test and the bacterial-mutation test being the most accurate (94% and 93% accurate respectively). These 2 tests were considered to be of general use in screening, since they were clearly more accurate than the others. Statistical consideration of various combinations of these tests showed that the use of cell transformation and bacterial mutation together, provide an advantage over the use of either test alone. The inclusion of the other 4 tests in a screening battery predictably resulted in a great increase in overall inaccuracy and loss of discrimination, even though the detection of carcinogens is improved. All the tests were shown to generate both false positive and false negative results, a situation which may be controlled by the use, where possible, of appropriate chemical-class controls, to identify the test which is optimal for the class of chemical under test. Structural analogy may have a part to play in the rapid detection of environmental carcinogens, and some general guidelines for its use are given.
已经描述了许多测试,这些测试被认为能够在不将实际诱发癌症作为终点的情况下识别致癌物。本研究比较了6种此类测试对120种有机化学品的选择的性能。所研究的测试包括:(1)鼠伤寒沙门氏菌的突变;(2)细胞转化;(3)内质网脱粒;(4)皮脂腺抑制;(5)四氮唑还原和(6)皮下植入。还简要检查了另外4种测试,但未纳入完整评估。根据已发表的实验数据,这些化学品被分为致癌物(58种)和非致癌物(62种),并分为4种宽泛化学类别中的1种。不同测试在预测致癌性的能力上存在相当大的差异,细胞转化测试和细菌突变测试最为准确(分别为94%和93%准确)。这两种测试被认为在筛选中具有普遍用途,因为它们明显比其他测试更准确。对这些测试的各种组合进行统计考虑表明,同时使用细胞转化和细菌突变比单独使用任何一种测试都更具优势。在筛选组合中纳入其他4种测试可预见地导致总体不准确性大幅增加和辨别力丧失,尽管致癌物的检测有所改善。所有测试都显示会产生假阳性和假阴性结果,这种情况可以通过在可能的情况下使用适当的化学类别对照来控制,以确定最适合被测化学类别的测试。结构类推可能在快速检测环境致癌物方面发挥作用,并给出了一些使用的一般指导原则。