Hasheminasab Fatemeh Sadat, Azimi Maryam, Khodadoost Mahmood, Chouban Bahram, Shakeri Nezhat, Ghasemi Saeedeh, Farokhi Azam, Mokaberinajad Roshanak
Pharmacology Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Adv Integr Med. 2022 Sep;9(3):185-190. doi: 10.1016/j.aimed.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
With the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and the growing attention of people around the world to the use of traditional and complementary medicines to control of the disease, evaluating the effectiveness of these treatments has received special attention.
This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of a barley-based () remedy combined with conventional medicine in comparison to the conventional therapy in confirmed COVID-19 patients.
Seventy COVID-19 patients were randomly divided into barley-based remedy plus conventional medicine (barley-based remedy group) and conventional therapy (control group). Both groups were treated for 5 days. The outcomes were oxygen saturation, main symptoms (fever, respiratory rate, cough, and fatigue), and laboratory data (lymphocytic count, and CRP); they were measured for 6 days.
In comparison to the control group, the oxygen saturation level in the barley-based remedy group significantly increased, from the second day of the intervention (P < 0.05). The herbal remedy significantly improved fatigue from the third day (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the severity and frequency of cough between the groups were not significantly different. The herbal remedy had no significant effect on the CRP and the lymphocytic count of every time points of measurement. The average of respiratory rate and temperature of patients were in the normal range in both groups during the intervention.
Barley-based remedy could significantly enhance the blood oxygen saturation and reduce fatigue. However, it needs to be confirmed by large sample size trials.
随着2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的大流行,以及世界各地人们对使用传统和补充药物控制该疾病的关注度不断提高,评估这些治疗方法的有效性受到了特别关注。
本研究旨在评估一种以大麦为基础的()疗法联合传统药物与传统疗法相比,对确诊的COVID-19患者的临床疗效。
70例COVID-19患者被随机分为大麦疗法加传统药物组(大麦疗法组)和传统治疗组(对照组)。两组均治疗5天。观察指标为血氧饱和度、主要症状(发热、呼吸频率、咳嗽和疲劳)以及实验室数据(淋巴细胞计数和CRP);在6天内进行测量。
与对照组相比,大麦疗法组的血氧饱和度水平从干预第二天起显著升高(P < 0.05)。草药疗法从第三天起显著改善了疲劳症状(P < 0.05)。同时,两组之间咳嗽的严重程度和频率没有显著差异。草药疗法对各测量时间点的CRP和淋巴细胞计数没有显著影响。干预期间两组患者的呼吸频率和体温平均值均在正常范围内。
以大麦为基础的疗法可显著提高血氧饱和度并减轻疲劳。然而,这需要通过大样本试验来证实。