• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用术后疼痛自我报告工具:定性研究。

Adoption of a Postoperative Pain Self-Report Tool: Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Thiel Bram, Iao Inez, Smid Joris, de Wit Emmy, Koopman Seppe, Geerts Bart, Godfried Marc, Kalkman Cor

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Services and Solutions Delivery, Philips Benelux, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Apr 26;9(2):e33706. doi: 10.2196/33706.

DOI:10.2196/33706
PMID:35471472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9092239/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With electronic technologies, patients are provided with tools to easily acquire information and to manage and record their own health status. eHealth interventions are already broadly applied to perioperative care. In a similar way, we aimed to utilize a smartphone application to enable postoperative patients to partially self-manage their postoperative pain. The results of a previously performed proof-of-concept study regarding the application were promising, and nurses as well as patients were optimistic regarding this innovative mobile application. Nevertheless, in reality, it appears that the usage and overall implementation of this application have stagnated since its introduction. Problems with innovation adoption are not novel; various studies have been conducted to explore the reasons for low implementation success of eHealth applications and indicated that adoption is influenced by multiple organizational factors. This study investigated the influence of these organizational factors on the adoption process, aiming to provide more insight in the dos and don'ts for implementing eHealth in the working processes of hospital care.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to provide insight in how to successfully implement a technological eHealth innovation in a general nonacademic hospital.

METHODS

A qualitative study was conducted to explore organizational factors affecting the innovation adoption process. Data were collected by conducting semistructured one-on-one interviews with 11 stakeholders. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis identifying overarching themes.

RESULTS

Absorptive capacity, referred to as an organization's dynamic capability pertaining to knowledge creation and utilization that enhances an organization's ability to gain and sustain a competitive advantage, was regarded as the most influential factor on the application's adoption. Accordingly, it appeared that innovation adoption is mainly determined by the capability and willingness to assimilate and transform new information into productive use and the ability to absorb a novel innovation. Absorptive capacity was found to be influenced by the innovation's benefit and the sense of ownership and responsibility. Organizational readiness and management support were also regarded as essential since absorptive capacity seemed to be mediated by these factors. The size of the hospital influenced eHealth adoption by the amount of resources available and by its organizational structure.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, absorptive capacity is essential for eHealth adoption, and it is mediated by management support and organizational readiness. It is recommended to increase the degree of willingness and ability to adopt an eHealth innovation by enhancing the relevance, engaging stakeholders, and assigning appropriate leaders to offer guidance.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1be/9092239/135bee4f8f01/humanfactors_v9i2e33706_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1be/9092239/135bee4f8f01/humanfactors_v9i2e33706_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1be/9092239/135bee4f8f01/humanfactors_v9i2e33706_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

借助电子技术,可为患者提供便于获取信息以及管理和记录自身健康状况的工具。电子健康干预措施已广泛应用于围手术期护理。同样,我们旨在利用一款智能手机应用程序,使术后患者能够部分自我管理术后疼痛。先前进行的关于该应用程序的概念验证研究结果很有前景,护士和患者对这款创新型移动应用程序都很乐观。然而,在现实中,自该应用程序推出以来,其使用和整体实施似乎陷入了停滞。创新采用方面的问题并不新鲜;已经开展了多项研究来探究电子健康应用程序实施成功率低的原因,并表明采用受到多种组织因素的影响。本研究调查了这些组织因素对采用过程的影响,旨在更深入了解在医院护理工作流程中实施电子健康的注意事项。

目的

本研究旨在深入了解如何在一家普通非学术性医院成功实施一项电子健康技术创新。

方法

开展了一项定性研究,以探究影响创新采用过程的组织因素。通过与11名利益相关者进行半结构化一对一访谈收集数据。使用主题分析法对数据进行分析,确定总体主题。

结果

吸收能力,即组织在知识创造和利用方面的动态能力,可增强组织获得并维持竞争优势的能力,被视为对该应用程序采用最具影响力的因素。因此,创新采用似乎主要取决于吸收和转化新信息以进行生产性利用的能力和意愿,以及吸收新创新的能力。发现吸收能力受创新效益以及主人翁意识和责任感的影响。组织准备情况和管理支持也被视为至关重要,因为吸收能力似乎受这些因素的调节。医院规模通过可用资源量及其组织结构影响电子健康的采用。

结论

总之,吸收能力对于电子健康的采用至关重要,并且它受管理支持和组织准备情况的调节。建议通过增强相关性、吸引利益相关者参与以及指定合适的领导者提供指导,来提高采用电子健康创新的意愿和能力。

相似文献

1
Adoption of a Postoperative Pain Self-Report Tool: Qualitative Study.采用术后疼痛自我报告工具:定性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Apr 26;9(2):e33706. doi: 10.2196/33706.
2
Absorptive capacity in the adoption of innovations in health: a scoping review.健康领域创新采用中的吸收能力:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Jan 1;21(1):6-32. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00436.
3
Clinicians' Role in the Adoption of an Oncology Decision Support App in Europe and Its Implications for Organizational Practices: Qualitative Case Study.临床医生在欧洲采用肿瘤学决策支持应用程序中的作用及其对组织实践的影响:定性案例研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 3;7(5):e13555. doi: 10.2196/13555.
4
Hospital organization culture, capacity to innovate and success in technology adoption.医院组织文化、创新能力与技术采用的成功
J Health Organ Manag. 2006;20(2-3):194-217. doi: 10.1108/14777260610662735.
5
Designing a Future eHealth Service for Posthospitalization Self-management Support in Long-term Illness: Qualitative Interview Study.为长期疾病患者出院后自我管理支持设计未来的电子健康服务:定性访谈研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Feb 6;10:e39391. doi: 10.2196/39391.
6
Experiences and Factors Affecting Usage of an eHealth Tool for Self-Management Among People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Qualitative Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用电子健康工具进行自我管理的体验及影响因素:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 30;23(4):e25672. doi: 10.2196/25672.
7
A patient as a self-manager of their personal data on health and disease with new technology--challenges for nursing education.患者借助新技术成为自身健康与疾病个人数据的管理者——护理教育面临的挑战
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Dec;35(12):e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.08.017. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
8
A Self-help Tool to Facilitate Implementation of eHealth Initiatives in Health Care (E-Ready): Formative Evaluation.一种促进医疗保健领域电子健康计划实施的自助工具(电子就绪):形成性评估。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jan 17;6(1):e17568. doi: 10.2196/17568.
9
Implementation of eMental Health care: viewpoints from key informants from organizations and agencies with eHealth mandates.电子心理健康护理的实施:来自负有电子健康任务的组织和机构关键信息提供者的观点。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0474-9.
10
Perspectives From Municipality Officials on the Adoption, Dissemination, and Implementation of Electronic Health Interventions to Support Caregivers of People With Dementia: Inductive Thematic Analysis.市政官员对采用、传播和实施电子健康干预措施以支持痴呆症患者照料者的看法:归纳主题分析
JMIR Aging. 2020 May 13;3(1):e17255. doi: 10.2196/17255.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient self-reported pain and nausea via smartphone following day care surgery, first year results: An observational cohort study.日间手术患者术后通过智能手机自我报告疼痛和恶心情况,第一年结果:一项观察性队列研究。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Jul 10;3(7):e0000342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000342. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Adherence to an eHealth Self-Management Intervention for Patients with Both COPD and Heart Failure: Results of a Pilot Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病和心力衰竭患者对电子健康自我管理干预措施的依从性:一项试点研究的结果
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Jul 15;16:2089-2103. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S299598. eCollection 2021.
2
Wireless Remote Home Monitoring of Vital Signs in Patients Discharged Early After Esophagectomy: Observational Feasibility Study.食管癌切除术后早期出院患者生命体征的无线远程家庭监测:观察性可行性研究
JMIR Perioper Med. 2020 Dec 4;3(2):e21705. doi: 10.2196/21705.
3
Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: A proof of concept.
患者使用智能手机应用报告术后疼痛:概念验证。
PLoS One. 2020 May 8;15(5):e0232082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232082. eCollection 2020.
4
The global burden of multiple chronic conditions: A narrative review.多种慢性病的全球负担:一项叙述性综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Oct 19;12:284-293. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.008. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
Evidence for the Quadruple Aim: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Physician Burnout and Patient Outcomes.四重目标的证据:医生倦怠和患者结果的文献系统评价。
Med Care. 2018 Dec;56(12):976-984. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000999.
6
Barriers and Facilitators to eHealth Use in Daily Practice: Perspectives of Patients and Professionals in Dermatology.日常实践中电子健康应用的障碍与促进因素:皮肤科患者及专业人员的观点
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 5;19(9):e300. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7512.
7
Using e-health in perioperative care: a survey study investigating shortcomings in current perioperative care and possible future solutions.围手术期护理中电子健康的应用:一项调查研究,探讨当前围手术期护理的不足及未来可能的解决方案。
BMC Surg. 2017 May 23;17(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0254-6.
8
eHealth adoption factors in medical hospitals: A focus on the Netherlands.公立医院采用电子健康的影响因素:以荷兰为例。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Apr;100:77-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Jan 21.
9
The Effect of Perioperative E-Health Interventions on the Postoperative Course: A Systematic Review of Randomised and Non-Randomised Controlled Trials.围手术期电子健康干预对术后病程的影响:随机对照试验和非随机对照试验的系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 6;11(7):e0158612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158612. eCollection 2016.
10
Searching for a Role of Nursing Personnel in Developing Landscape of Ehealth: Factors Determining Attitudes toward Key Patient Empowering Applications.探寻护理人员在电子健康发展格局中的作用:决定对关键患者赋权应用态度的因素
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 6;11(4):e0153173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153173. eCollection 2016.