European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Environ Res. 2022 Sep;212(Pt B):113358. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113358. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
In research and policy design we mainly use a 'population weighted average concentrations' perspective to study changes in air quality, to evaluate if past policies have been effective, or to assess the impact of future air quality plans. This angle is useful and informative, but sometimes masks other important patterns. In this paper we propose to add, to the existing population weighted average point of view, a new indicator that brings to the fore the 'inequalities' in exposure. This inequality indicator is based on the Gini coefficient, usually applied in Economics and here considered to evaluate if exposure to air pollutants is equally distributed among population. A case study for this new indicator is then proposed, to assess the evolution of exposure to air pollutants in Europe from 2000 to 2018, in terms of both average exposure and inequality levels. The results show that using only average exposure metrics can mask other interesting patterns, and confirm the benefits of including this alternative perspective into the analysis.
在研究和政策设计中,我们主要使用“人口加权平均浓度”的观点来研究空气质量的变化,以评估过去的政策是否有效,或评估未来空气质量计划的影响。这种角度是有用和有益的,但有时会掩盖其他重要的模式。在本文中,我们建议在现有的人口加权平均观点之外,增加一个新的指标,突出暴露的“不平等”。这个不平等指标基于基尼系数,通常应用于经济学领域,在这里被用来评估空气污染物的暴露是否在人口中平均分配。然后提出了一个这个新指标的案例研究,以评估 2000 年至 2018 年期间欧洲空气污染物暴露的演变,包括平均暴露水平和不平等程度。结果表明,仅使用平均暴露指标可能会掩盖其他有趣的模式,并证实将这种替代观点纳入分析的好处。