Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Environ Res. 2018 Feb;161:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.028. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
Mounting evidence over the past several decades has demonstrated inequitable distribution of pollutants of ambient origin between sociodemographic groups in the United States. Most environmental inequality studies to date are cross-sectional and used proximity-based methods rather than modeled air pollution concentrations, limiting the ability to examine trends over time or the factors that drive exposure inequalities. In this paper, we use 1km modeled PM and NO concentrations in Massachusetts over an 8-year period and Census demographic data to quantify inequality between sociodemographic groups and to develop a more nuanced understanding of the drivers and trends in longitudinal air pollution inequality. Annual-average population-weighted PM and NO concentrations were highest for urban non-Hispanic black populations (11.8µg/m in 2003 and 8.4µg/m in 2010, vs. 11.3µg/m and 8.1µg/m for urban non-Hispanic whites) and urban Hispanic populations (15.9 ppb in 2005 and 13.0 ppb in 2010, vs. 13.0 ppb and 10.2 ppb for urban non-Hispanic whites), respectively. While population groups experienced similar absolute decreases in exposure over time, disparities in population-weighted concentrations increased over time when quantified by the Atkinson Index, a relative inequality measure. Exposure inequalities were approximately one order of magnitude greater for NO compared to PM, were more pronounced in urban compared to rural geographies, and between racial/ethnic groups compared to income and educational attainment groups. Our results also revealed similar longitudinal PM and NO inequality trends using Census 2000 and Census 2010 data, indicating that spatio-temporal shifts in air pollution may best explain observed trends in inequality. These findings enhance our understanding of factors that contribute to persistent inequalities and underscore the importance of targeted exposure reduction strategies aimed at vulnerable populations and neighborhoods.
过去几十年的大量证据表明,在美国,社会人口群体之间环境污染物的分布不均。迄今为止,大多数环境不平等研究都是横断面研究,使用基于接近度的方法而不是模拟的空气污染浓度,这限制了检查随时间推移的趋势或导致暴露不平等的因素的能力。在本文中,我们使用了马萨诸塞州 8 年来 1km 模拟的 PM 和 NO 浓度以及人口普查人口统计数据,来量化社会人口群体之间的不平等,并更深入地了解纵向空气污染不平等的驱动因素和趋势。2003 年和 2010 年,城市非西班牙裔黑人人口的年平均人群加权 PM 和 NO 浓度最高(分别为 11.8µg/m 和 8.4µg/m),而城市非西班牙裔白人的 PM 和 NO 浓度分别为 11.3µg/m 和 8.1µg/m;2005 年和 2010 年,城市西班牙裔人口的年平均人群加权 PM 和 NO 浓度最高(分别为 15.9 ppb 和 13.0 ppb),而城市非西班牙裔白人的 PM 和 NO 浓度分别为 13.0 ppb 和 10.2 ppb。虽然人口群体随时间经历了类似的绝对暴露量下降,但当用相对不平等度量指标阿特金森指数(Atkinson Index)进行量化时,人群加权浓度的差异随时间增加。与 PM 相比,NO 的暴露不平等程度约高出一个数量级,在城市地区比农村地区更为明显,在种族/族裔群体之间比在收入和教育程度群体之间更为明显。我们的结果还表明,使用人口普查 2000 年和人口普查 2010 年的数据,PM 和 NO 的不平等趋势也具有相似的纵向趋势,这表明空气污染的时空变化可能最好地解释了不平等的观察趋势。这些发现增强了我们对导致持续不平等的因素的理解,并强调了针对弱势群体和社区的有针对性的减少暴露策略的重要性。