Frequency of duodenal anatomical variants in neonatal and pediatric upper gastrointestinal tract series (UGI) and the influence of exam quality on diagnostic reporting of these.

AIM

To determine frequency of duodenal anatomical variants on clinically indicated pediatric UGI examinations and determine the influence of these variants and exam quality on the reliability of diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two-pediatric radiologists retrospectively reviewed 100-UGI exams performed on children ≤18-years. Exams were considered diagnostic if the duodenojejunal (DJ) flexure was identified. For diagnostic exams, readers categorized the duodenal location and shape as: normal, normal variant, or abnormal. Exam quality was assessed according to duodenal visualization, number of boluses required, and patient positioning.

RESULTS

Reader 1: 90/100 exams diagnostic -77% normal duodenum, 20% normal variant, and 3% abnormal. Reader 2: 97/100 exams diagnostic - 88% normal, 8% normal variant, and 4% abnormal. Original reports: 99/100 exams diagnostic - 92% normal, 3% normal variant, and 5% abnormal. 42% of exams were "high-quality" and 58% were "low-quality". The number of abnormal was the same between readers in "high-quality" studies. In "low-quality" studies reader 1 and the original read diagnosed 1 further case as non-rotation which was diagnosed as a normal variant by reader 2. Two further cases were reported as non-rotation by the original reader. Inter-rater reliability was significantly higher among each pair of raters in "high quality" exams (κ 0.3; p ≤ 0.05) compared to "low quality" exams (k < 0.1 - p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Duodenal variants were diagnosed in 8-20% of UGI. Compromised exam quality contributes to poor interrater reliability and may result in diagnostic errors of normal variant duodenums, posing a risk for unnecessary intervention and/or delayed treatment.