• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体水平特征是什么,它们是如何进化的?

What Are Group Level Traits and How Do They Evolve?

机构信息

Center for Science, Athabasca University, 1 University Dr., T9S 3A3, Athabasca, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2023 Sep;57(3):913-936. doi: 10.1007/s12124-022-09689-1. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1007/s12124-022-09689-1
PMID:35474418
Abstract

Cultural traits are seldom atomic, are distributed over multiple social domains, and undergo differential selection. This makes it important to study the nature and evolution of these traits from a global viewpoint. This paper considers group level cultural traits-what sort of traits are there, how do they evolve, and what is the relationship between cultural traits and their representation in individual worldviews. While not providing a concise theory, important aspects of cultural traits are elaborated and directions of further research indicated. Group level traits arising from individual biological traits are distinguished from those that are intrinsic to a group. The latter are formative of individual worldviews and are emotionally salient for group members. Children are saturated with culture from birth, it provides the scaffolding for their developing worldviews. Affective links between cultural ideas, social behavior, and material elements of culture develop so that the affordances in perceived situations carry biases influencing behavior toward culturally acceptable responses. Intrinsic traits are not, however, acted on directly by group level selection; rather, this selection acts on the behavior of group members and only indirectly on intrinsic cultural ideas through social exchange processes between group members.

摘要

文化特征很少是单一的,它们分布在多个社会领域,并经历着不同的选择。这使得从全球视角研究这些特征的性质和演变变得尤为重要。本文从全球视角考虑群体层面的文化特征——有哪些特征,它们是如何演变的,以及文化特征与其在个体世界观中的表现之间的关系。本文虽然没有提供一个简洁的理论,但阐述了文化特征的重要方面,并指出了进一步研究的方向。从个体生物特征中产生的群体层面特征与那些内在的群体特征是不同的。后者是个体世界观形成的基础,对群体成员具有情感上的重要性。从出生起,儿童就被文化所包围,文化为他们正在发展的世界观提供了框架。文化观念、社会行为和文化物质元素之间的情感联系不断发展,以至于在感知到的情境中提供的机会带有偏见,影响着对文化上可接受反应的行为。然而,内在特征并不是直接受到群体层面选择的影响;相反,这种选择作用于群体成员的行为,并且只是通过群体成员之间的社会交换过程间接地影响内在的文化观念。

相似文献

1
What Are Group Level Traits and How Do They Evolve?群体水平特征是什么,它们是如何进化的?
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2023 Sep;57(3):913-936. doi: 10.1007/s12124-022-09689-1. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
2
Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence.文化群体选择在解释人类合作方面起着至关重要的作用:证据概述。
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e30. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1400106X. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
3
The cultural evolution of emergent group-level traits.突现群体水平特征的文化进化。
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Jun;37(3):243-54. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13001544.
4
The coevolution of cultural groups and ingroup favoritism.文化群体与内群体偏袒的共同进化。
Science. 2008 Sep 26;321(5897):1844-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1155805.
5
Evolution of social learning does not explain the origin of human cumulative culture.社会学习的演变并不能解释人类累积文化的起源。
J Theor Biol. 2007 May 7;246(1):129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.12.022. Epub 2006 Dec 27.
6
Models of cultural niche construction with selection and assortative mating.具有选择和交配选择的文化生态位构建模型。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042744. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
7
Cumulative cultural dynamics and the coevolution of cultural innovation and transmission: an ESS model for panmictic and structured populations.累积文化动态与文化创新和传播的共同进化:均匀混合和结构化群体的 ESS 模型。
J Evol Biol. 2010 Nov;23(11):2356-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02096.x. Epub 2010 Sep 6.
8
Evolution of improvement and cumulative culture.进步与累积文化的演变
Theor Popul Biol. 2013 Feb;83:30-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
9
Cultural evolution and emergent group-level traits through social heterosis.通过社会杂种优势实现文化进化和新兴的群体水平特征。
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Jun;37(3):266-7. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1300294X.
10
The effect of cultural interaction on cumulative cultural evolution.文化互动对累积文化进化的影响。
J Theor Biol. 2014 Jul 7;352:6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.02.032. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Operationalizing cultural adaptation to climate change: contemporary examples from United States agriculture.使文化适应气候变化的措施化:来自美国农业的当代实例。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Nov 6;378(1889):20220397. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0397. Epub 2023 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

1
The Price Equation Program: Simple Invariances Unify Population Dynamics, Thermodynamics, Probability, Information and Inference.价格方程程序:简单不变性统一种群动态、热力学、概率、信息与推理。
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Dec 16;20(12):978. doi: 10.3390/e20120978.
2
Transient brain networks underlying interpersonal strategies during synchronized action.同步行为中人际策略的瞬态脑网络。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Jan 18;16(1-2):19-30. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa056.
3
Social learning through associative processes: a computational theory.
通过联想过程进行的社会学习:一种计算理论。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Mar 13;6(3):181777. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181777. eCollection 2019 Mar.
4
Methods for studying cultural attraction.研究文化吸引力的方法。
Evol Anthropol. 2019 Jan;28(1):18-20. doi: 10.1002/evan.21764. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
5
Two cognitive transitions underlying the capacity for cultural evolution.文化进化能力背后的两种认知转变。
J Anthropol Sci. 2018 Dec 31;96:27-52. doi: 10.4436/JASS.96008. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
6
Evaluating the Theoretic Adequacy and Applied Potential of Computational Models of the Spacing Effect.评估间隔效应计算模型的理论充分性和应用潜力。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;42 Suppl 3:644-691. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12602. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
7
Cultural niche construction and human evolution.文化生态位构建与人类进化。
J Evol Biol. 2001 Jan 8;14(1):22-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00262.x.
8
Autocatalytic networks in cognition and the origin of culture.认知中的自催化网络与文化的起源
J Theor Biol. 2017 Oct 27;431:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.07.022. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
9
An evolutionary perspective on maladaptive traits and cultural conformity.关于适应不良特征与文化从众性的进化视角。
Am J Hum Biol. 1996;8(5):615-629. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(1996)8:5<615::AID-AJHB7>3.0.CO;2-U.
10
Focal colors across languages are representative members of color categories.跨语言的焦点颜色是颜色类别的代表性成员。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 4;113(40):11178-11183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1513298113. Epub 2016 Sep 19.