Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University Alpert School of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Aug 24;42(9):1067-1076. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac106.
Breast Implant Illness (BII), as described in recent medical literature and by social media, describes a range of symptoms in patients with breast implants for which there are no physical findings or laboratory results that explain their symptoms.
Part 2 of this study aims to determine whether heavy metals are present in the capsules around saline and silicone implants and if there are statistical differences in the type or level of these metals between women with or without symptoms. Demographic data was collected to investigate potential alternate sources of metals: inhaled, absorbed, or ingested.
A prospective, blinded study enrolled 150 consecutive subjects divided equally into in three cohorts: (A) women with systemic symptoms they attribute to their implants who requested implant removal, (B) women with breast implants requesting removal or exchange who do not have symptoms they attribute to their implants, and (C) women undergoing cosmetic mastopexy who have never had any implanted medical device. Capsule tissue was removed from Cohort A and B for analysis of 22 heavy metals. Additionally, breast tissue was obtained from a control group with no previous exposure to any implanted medical device.
The study was performed between 2019-2021. Heavy metal content was compared between the capsule tissue from Cohort A and B. The only statistically significant differences identified in Cohort A were higher levels of arsenic and zinc, and lower levels of cobalt, manganese, silver, and tin. There were no elevated levels or statistically significant differences in the other metals tested between Cohorts A and B.
This study analyzes the metal content in capsules surrounding both saline and silicone breast implants. Heavy metals were also detected in the non-implant control group breast tissue, with some metals at numerically higher levels than either breast implant cohort. Smoking, gluten free diets, dietary supplements, and the presence of tattoos were all identified as statistically significant sources of arsenic and zinc in Cohort A. The risk of heavy metal toxicity should not be used as an indication for total capsulectomy if patients elect to remove their breast implants.
最近的医学文献和社交媒体描述了一种名为乳房植入体病(BII)的病症,它描述了一组乳房植入体患者的各种症状,这些症状没有物理发现或实验室结果可以解释。
本研究的第二部分旨在确定盐水和硅胶植入物周围的胶囊中是否存在重金属,如果存在,这些金属的类型或水平在有症状和无症状的女性之间是否存在统计学差异。收集了人口统计学数据,以调查金属的潜在其他来源:吸入、吸收或摄入。
一项前瞻性、盲法研究纳入了 150 名连续患者,平均分为三组:(A)因植入物而出现全身症状并要求取出植入物的女性;(B)因植入物而要求取出或更换植入物且无症状归因于植入物的女性;(C)因美容乳房成形术而从未使用过任何植入式医疗器械的女性。从 A 组和 B 组患者的胶囊组织中提取 22 种重金属进行分析。此外,还从从未接触过任何植入式医疗器械的对照组中获得了乳房组织。
该研究于 2019-2021 年进行。比较了 A 组和 B 组胶囊组织中的重金属含量。在 A 组中唯一发现的具有统计学意义的差异是砷和锌的水平较高,钴、锰、银和锡的水平较低。在 A 组和 B 组之间,未检测到其他金属的水平升高或具有统计学意义的差异。
本研究分析了盐水和硅胶乳房植入物周围胶囊的金属含量。非植入物对照组的乳房组织中也检测到了重金属,其中一些金属的水平高于任何乳房植入物组。吸烟、无麸质饮食、膳食补充剂和纹身的存在被确定为 A 组中砷和锌的统计学上显著来源。如果患者选择取出乳房植入物,则不应将重金属毒性的风险作为进行全包膜切除术的指征。