Tully Emma K, Hayes Ian P, Hughes Peter D, Sypek Matthew P
Department of General Surgical Specialties, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Department of Nephrology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC Australia.
Transplant Direct. 2022 Apr 21;8(5):e1308. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001308. eCollection 2022 May.
The reporting of a locally validated kidney donor profile index (KDPI) began in Australia in 2016. Across diverse populations, KDPI has demonstrated utility in predicting allograft survival and function. A metric that incorporates both elements may provide a more comprehensive picture of suboptimal recipient outcomes.
A retrospective cohort study of adult kidney transplant recipients in Australia (January 2009 to December 2014) was conducted. Conventional recipient outcomes and a composite measure of suboptimal outcome (1-y allograft failure or estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min) were evaluated across KDPI intervals (KDPI quintiles and 5-point increments in the KDPI 81-100 cohort). The impact of increasing KDPI on allograft function (1-y eGFR) and a suboptimal outcome was explored using multivariable regression models, adjusting for potential confounding factors.
In 2923 donor kidneys eligible for analysis, median KDPI was 54 (interquartile range [IQR], 31-77), and Kidney Donor Risk Index was 1.39 (IQR, 1.03-1.67). The median 1-y eGFR was 52.74 mL/min (IQR, 40.79-66.41 mL/min). Compared with the first quintile reference group, progressive reductions in eGFR were observed with increasing KDPI and were maximal in the fifth quintile (adjusted β-coefficient: -27.43 mL/min; 95% confidence interval, -29.44 to -25.42; < 0.001). A suboptimal outcome was observed in 359 recipients (12.3%). The adjusted odds for this outcome increased across quintiles from a baseline of odds ratio of 1.00 (first quintile) to odds ratio of 11.68 (95% confidence interval, 6.33-21.54, < 0.001) in the fifth quintile cohort.
Increases in donor KDPI were associated with higher probabilities of a suboptimal outcome and poorer baseline allograft function, particularly in the KDPI > 80 cohort. These findings may inform pretransplant discussions with potential recipients of high-KDPI allografts.
2016年澳大利亚开始报告经本地验证的肾脏供体特征指数(KDPI)。在不同人群中,KDPI已证明在预测同种异体移植存活和功能方面具有实用性。一种综合了这两个要素的指标可能会更全面地反映次优受者结局。
对澳大利亚成年肾移植受者进行了一项回顾性队列研究(2009年1月至2014年12月)。在KDPI区间(KDPI五分位数以及KDPI 81 - 100队列中的5分增量)内评估传统的受者结局以及次优结局的综合指标(1年移植肾失功或估计肾小球滤过率[eGFR]<30 mL/min)。使用多变量回归模型探讨KDPI升高对移植肾功能(1年eGFR)和次优结局的影响,并对潜在混杂因素进行校正。
在2923个符合分析条件的供肾中,KDPI中位数为54(四分位间距[IQR],31 - 77),肾脏供体风险指数为1.39(IQR,1.03 - 1.67)。1年eGFR中位数为52.74 mL/min(IQR,40.79 - 66.41 mL/min)。与第一五分位数参考组相比,随着KDPI升高,eGFR逐渐降低,在第五五分位数时降幅最大(校正β系数:-27.43 mL/min;95%置信区间,-29.44至-25.42;P<0.001)。359名受者(12.3%)出现了次优结局。该结局的校正比值在各五分位数中逐渐升高,从第一五分位数基线的比值比1.00升至第五五分位数队列中的比值比11.68(95%置信区间,6.33 - 21.54,P<0.001)。
供体KDPI升高与次优结局的较高概率以及较差的移植肾基线功能相关,尤其是在KDPI>80的队列中。这些发现可能为与高KDPI同种异体移植潜在受者的移植前讨论提供参考。