Suppr超能文献

炎症标志物在诊断感染性糖尿病足溃疡和糖尿病足骨髓炎中的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Douglas, Queensland, Australia.

Bachelor of Medicine & Bachelor of Surgery, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Apr 27;17(4):e0267412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267412. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes foot ulcer (DFU) is a complication of diabetes mellitus. Accurate diagnosis of DFU severity through inflammatory markers will assist in reducing impact on quality of life. We aimed to ascertain the diagnostic test accuracy of commonly used inflammatory markers such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and white cell count (WCC) for the diagnosis and differentiation between DFU grades based on the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot classification system.

METHODS

This systematic review explored studies that investigated one or more of the above-listed index tests aiding in diagnosing infected DFU. This review was registered on PROSPERO database (ID = CRD42021255618) and searched 5 databases including an assessment of the references of included studies. Records were manually screened as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A total of 16 studies were included which were assessed for quality using QUADAS-2 tool and meta-analysed using Meta-Disc v1.4.

RESULTS

CRP had the greatest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893 for diagnosing grade 2 DFU. This returned a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 77.4% (95% CI: 72% to 82%) and 84.3% (95% CI: 79% to 89%) respectively. In terms of diagnosing grade 3 DFU, procalcitonin had the highest AUC value of 0.844 when compared with other markers. The pooled sensitivity of PCT was calculated as 85.5% (95% CI: 79% to 90%) and specificity as 68.9% (95% CI: 63% to 75%).

CONCLUSION

CRP and PCT are the best markers for diagnosing grade 2 and grade 3 DFU respectively. Other markers are also valuable when used in conjunction with clinical judgement. The findings accentuate the necessity of further research to establish standardised cut-off values for these inflammatory markers in diagnosing diabetic foot ulcers.

摘要

背景

糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)是糖尿病的一种并发症。通过炎症标志物准确诊断 DFU 的严重程度有助于降低对生活质量的影响。我们旨在确定红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C 反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)和白细胞计数(WCC)等常用炎症标志物的诊断测试准确性,用于根据国际糖尿病足工作组分类系统诊断和区分 DFU 分级。

方法

本系统评价研究了一项或多项上述指标检测试验,以帮助诊断感染性 DFU。该研究在 PROSPERO 数据库(ID = CRD42021255618)中进行了注册,并对 5 个数据库进行了检索,包括对纳入研究参考文献的评估。根据系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选条目(PRISMA)指南,对记录进行了手动筛选。共纳入了 16 项研究,使用 QUADAS-2 工具对这些研究进行了质量评估,并使用 Meta-Disc v1.4 进行了荟萃分析。

结果

CRP 对诊断 2 级 DFU 的曲线下面积(AUC)最大,为 0.893。这表明其合并敏感性和特异性分别为 77.4%(95%CI:72%至 82%)和 84.3%(95%CI:79%至 89%)。在诊断 3 级 DFU 方面,与其他标志物相比,降钙素原的 AUC 值最高,为 0.844。降钙素原的合并敏感性计算为 85.5%(95%CI:79%至 90%),特异性为 68.9%(95%CI:63%至 75%)。

结论

CRP 和 PCT 分别是诊断 2 级和 3 级 DFU 的最佳标志物。其他标志物与临床判断结合使用也具有价值。这些发现强调了进一步研究的必要性,以确定这些炎症标志物在诊断糖尿病足溃疡时的标准化截断值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1400/9045669/7ffd2666baf8/pone.0267412.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验