• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

choking 损伤:日本急性医院患者相关因素和导致失误的情况。

Choking injuries: Associated factors and error-producing conditions among acute hospital patients in Japan.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Yahaba-cho, Iwate, Japan.

Department of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Apr 27;17(4):e0267430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267430. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0267430
PMID:35476697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9045662/
Abstract

Choking can lead to mortality and residual impairments. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with choking among acute hospital patients and examine error-producing conditions to suggest choking-prevention policies. Among 36,364 cases reported by hospital staff at an acute university hospital from 2012 to 2018 were examined using a retrospective study, 35,440 were analysis as the number of cases analysed for the study. We used descriptive statistics to present patient characteristics and conducted univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with choking. Additionally, we conducted content analysis (root cause analysis) to examine error-producing conditions and prevention policies. Sixty-eight cases were related to choking injuries; of these, 43 patients (63.2%) were male, and 38 (55.9%) were aged 65 years and older. Choking cases had a high percent of adverse outcomes involving residual impairment or death (n = 23, 33.8%). Mental illness (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 3.14 [1.39-7.08]), and hospitalisation in the general wards (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 3.13 [1.70-5.76]) were associated with an increased probability of choking. Error production was caused by food (n = 25, 36.8%) and medical devices or supplies (n = 13, 19.1%). Almost all contributory factors were associated with inadequate checking (n = 66, 97.1%) and misperception of risk (n = 65, 95.6%). Choking poses a highly significant burden on patients, and hospital administrators should minimise the risk of choking to prevent related injuries. Hospital administrators should provide training and education to their staff and develop adequate protocols and procedures to prevent choking.

摘要

窒息可导致死亡和残留损伤。本研究旨在确定与急性医院患者窒息相关的因素,并研究导致窒息的错误条件,以提出预防窒息的政策。使用回顾性研究对 2012 年至 2018 年期间医院工作人员报告的 36364 例病例进行了检查,分析了 35440 例作为本研究的病例数。我们使用描述性统计方法呈现患者特征,并进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定与窒息相关的因素。此外,我们还进行了内容分析(根本原因分析),以检查导致窒息的错误条件和预防政策。68 例与窒息损伤有关;其中,43 例(63.2%)为男性,38 例(55.9%)年龄在 65 岁及以上。窒息病例不良结局发生率较高,涉及残留损伤或死亡(n=23,33.8%)。精神疾病(调整后优势比[95%置信区间]:3.14[1.39-7.08])和普通病房住院(调整后优势比[95%置信区间]:3.13[1.70-5.76])与窒息发生的概率增加相关。食物(n=25,36.8%)和医疗器械或用品(n=13,19.1%)是导致错误的主要原因。几乎所有的促成因素都与不充分检查(n=66,97.1%)和风险感知错误(n=65,95.6%)有关。窒息对患者造成了巨大的负担,医院管理者应尽量降低窒息风险,以预防相关损伤。医院管理者应向其员工提供培训和教育,并制定适当的协议和程序以预防窒息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3850/9045662/75cb6745990d/pone.0267430.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3850/9045662/75cb6745990d/pone.0267430.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3850/9045662/75cb6745990d/pone.0267430.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Choking injuries: Associated factors and error-producing conditions among acute hospital patients in Japan. choking 损伤:日本急性医院患者相关因素和导致失误的情况。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 27;17(4):e0267430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267430. eCollection 2022.
2
Epidemiology of Food Choking Deaths in Japan: Time Trends and Regional Variations.日本食物性窒息死亡的流行病学:时间趋势和地域差异。
J Epidemiol. 2021 May 5;31(5):356-360. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20200057. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
3
Choking incidents among psychiatric inpatients: a retrospective study in Chutung Veterans General Hospital.精神科住院患者噎食事件:庄头营退伍军人总医院的回顾性研究。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2010 Aug;73(8):419-24. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(10)70090-3.
4
Trends in pediatric mortality from food choking in children with intellectual disability during 1991-2005.1991 - 2005年智力残疾儿童因食物窒息导致的儿科死亡率趋势。
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2008 Oct-Dec;20(4):547-51. doi: 10.1515/ijamh.2008.20.4.547.
5
Medical malpractice litigation related to choking accidents in older people in Japan.日本老年人噎食事故相关的医疗事故诉讼
Gerodontology. 2021 Mar;38(1):104-112. doi: 10.1111/ger.12506. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
6
Associations between chronic diseases and choking deaths among older adults in the USA: a cross-sectional study using multiple cause mortality data from 2009 to 2013.美国老年人慢性病与窒息死亡之间的关联:一项使用2009年至2013年多死因死亡率数据的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 12;5(11):e009464. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009464.
7
Common factors associated with choking in psychiatric patients.与精神科患者噎食相关的常见因素。
J Nurs Res. 2015 Jun;23(2):94-100. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000060.
8
Increasing awareness of food-choking and nutrition in children through education of caregivers: the CHOP community intervention trial study protocol.通过对看护者进行教育提高儿童对食物噎塞和营养的认识:CHOP 社区干预试验研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):1156. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7469-7.
9
Pediatric exposure to choking hazards is associated with parental knowledge of choking hazards.儿童接触窒息危险与父母对窒息危险的认知有关。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Feb;76(2):169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.10.018. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
10
Food-related choking deaths among the elderly.老年人中与食物相关的窒息死亡
Inj Prev. 2014 Jun;20(3):200-3. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-040795. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of Uncertainty in Medical Care Among Non-medical Professionals and Nurses in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Internet-Based Preliminary Survey.日本非医学专业人员和护士对医疗护理中不确定性的认知:基于互联网的横断面初步调查。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 2;16(3):e55418. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55418. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Comparison of physicians' and dentists' incident reports in open data from the Japan Council for Quality Health Care: a mixed-method study.比较来自日本医疗品质促进机构公开资料中医生和牙医的不良事件报告:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Feb 2;23(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02749-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Age-Related Changes to Eating and Swallowing Impact Frailty: Aspiration, Choking Risk, Modified Food Texture and Autonomy of Choice.饮食与吞咽方面的年龄相关变化对衰弱的影响:误吸、窒息风险、改良食物质地及选择自主权。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2018 Oct 12;3(4):69. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics3040069.
2
Death as a Consequence of Foreign Body Aspiration in Children.儿童因异物吸入导致的死亡
Med Arch. 2018 Jun;72(3):220-223. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.220-223.
3
Factors contributing to cancer-related suicide: A study of root-cause analysis reports.
导致癌症相关自杀的因素:根本原因分析报告研究。
Psychooncology. 2018 Sep;27(9):2237-2244. doi: 10.1002/pon.4815. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
4
Suffocation Injuries in the United States: Patient Characteristics and Factors Associated with Mortality.美国窒息伤:患者特征及与死亡率相关的因素。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;19(4):707-714. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.4.37198. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
5
The occurrence, types, consequences and preventability of in-hospital adverse events - a scoping review.住院不良事件的发生率、类型、后果及可预防性——一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 4;18(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3335-z.
6
Estimation of the number of patient deaths recognized by a medical practitioner as caused by adverse events in hospitals in Japan: A cross-sectional study.日本医院中医师认定由不良事件导致的患者死亡人数估计:一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(39):e8128. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008128.
7
Inadequate hand-off communication.交接班沟通不足。
Sentinel Event Alert. 2017 Sep 12(58):1-6.
8
Our current approach to root cause analysis: is it contributing to our failure to improve patient safety?我们当前的根本原因分析方法:它是否导致了我们在改善患者安全方面的失败?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):381-387. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005991. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
9
Deaths from unintentional injury among adults aged 65 and over: United States, 2000-2013.2000 - 2013年美国65岁及以上成年人的意外伤害死亡情况
NCHS Data Brief. 2015 May(199):199.
10
Common factors associated with choking in psychiatric patients.与精神科患者噎食相关的常见因素。
J Nurs Res. 2015 Jun;23(2):94-100. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000060.