Schuijt Michiel T U, Hol Liselotte, Nijbroek Sunny G, Ahuja Sanchit, van Meenen David, Mazzinari Guido, Hemmes Sabrine, Bluth Thomas, Ball Lorenzo, Gama-de Abreu Marcelo, Pelosi Paolo, Schultz Marcus J, Serpa Neto Ary
Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Apr 16;47:101397. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101397. eCollection 2022 May.
While an association of the intraoperative driving pressure with postoperative pulmonary complications has been described before, it is uncertain whether the intraoperative mechanical power is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications.
Posthoc analysis of two international, multicentre randomised clinical trials (ISRCTN70332574 and NCT02148692) conducted between 2011-2013 and 2014-2018, in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery comparing the effect of two different positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels on postoperative pulmonary complications. Time-weighted average dynamic driving pressure and mechanical power were calculated for individual patients. A multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for confounders was used to assess the independent associations of driving pressure and mechanical power with the occurrence of a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications, the primary endpoint of this posthoc analysis.
In 1191 patients included, postoperative pulmonary complications occurrence was 35.9%. Median time-weighted average driving pressure and mechanical power were 14·0 [11·0-17·0] cmHO, and 7·6 [5·1-10·0] J/min, respectively. While driving pressure was not independently associated with postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio, 1·06 [95% CI 0·88-1·28]; =0.534), the mechanical power had an independent association with the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio, 1·28 [95% CI 1·05-1·57]; =0.016). These findings were independent of body mass index or the level of PEEP used, i.e., independent of the randomisation arm.
In this merged cohort of surgery patients, higher intraoperative mechanical power was independently associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. Mechanical power could serve as a summary ventilatory biomarker for the risk for postoperative pulmonary complications in these patients, but our findings need confirmation in other, preferably prospective studies.
The two original studies were supported by unrestricted grants from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and the Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC. For this current analysis, no additional funding was requested. The funding sources had neither a role in the design, collection of data, statistical analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the report, nor in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
虽然之前已有关于术中驱动压与术后肺部并发症之间关联的描述,但术中机械功率是否与术后肺部并发症相关尚不确定。
对2011 - 2013年和2014 - 2018年期间进行的两项国际多中心随机临床试验(ISRCTN70332574和NCT02148692)进行事后分析,研究对象为接受开腹手术的患者,比较两种不同呼气末正压(PEEP)水平对术后肺部并发症的影响。计算了个体患者的时间加权平均动态驱动压和机械功率。使用针对混杂因素进行调整的多变量逻辑回归模型,评估驱动压和机械功率与术后肺部并发症综合发生情况(此次事后分析的主要终点)之间的独立关联。
纳入的1191例患者中,术后肺部并发症发生率为35.9%。时间加权平均驱动压和机械功率的中位数分别为14.0 [11.0 - 17.0] cmH₂O和7.6 [5.1 - 10.0] J/min。虽然驱动压与术后肺部并发症无独立关联(比值比,1.06 [95%可信区间0.88 - 1.28];P = 0.534),但机械功率与术后肺部并发症的发生有独立关联(比值比,1.28 [95%可信区间1.05 - 1.57];P = 0.016)。这些发现独立于体重指数或所用PEEP水平,即独立于随机分组臂。
在这个合并的手术患者队列中,较高的术中机械功率与术后肺部并发症独立相关。机械功率可作为这些患者术后肺部并发症风险的通气生物标志物总结,但我们的发现需要在其他研究(最好是前瞻性研究)中得到证实。
两项原始研究由欧洲麻醉学会和阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心(AMC院区)提供的无限制赠款支持。对于此次当前分析,未请求额外资金。资金来源在研究设计、数据收集、统计分析、数据解读、报告撰写以及提交论文发表的决策过程中均未发挥作用。