Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 相关 ARDS 患者与大流行前肺炎相关 ARDS 患者的流行病学、通气管理和结局比较。

Epidemiology, ventilation management and outcomes of COVID-19 ARDS patients versus patients with ARDS due to pneumonia in the Pre-COVID era.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location 'AMC', Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Intensive Care, Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Respir Res. 2024 Aug 17;25(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02910-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ventilation management may differ between COVID-19 ARDS (COVID-ARDS) patients and patients with pre-COVID ARDS (CLASSIC-ARDS); it is uncertain whether associations of ventilation management with outcomes for CLASSIC-ARDS also exist in COVID-ARDS.

METHODS

Individual patient data analysis of COVID-ARDS and CLASSIC-ARDS patients in six observational studies of ventilation, four in the COVID-19 pandemic and two pre-pandemic. Descriptive statistics were used to compare epidemiology and ventilation characteristics. The primary endpoint were key ventilation parameters; other outcomes included mortality and ventilator-free days and alive (VFD-60) at day 60.

RESULTS

This analysis included 6702 COVID-ARDS patients and 1415 CLASSIC-ARDS patients. COVID-ARDS patients received lower median V (6.6 [6.0 to 7.4] vs 7.3 [6.4 to 8.5] ml/kg PBW; p < 0.001) and higher median PEEP (12.0 [10.0 to 14.0] vs 8.0 [6.0 to 10.0] cm HO; p < 0.001), at lower median ΔP (13.0 [10.0 to 15.0] vs 16.0 [IQR 12.0 to 20.0] cm HO; p < 0.001) and higher median Crs (33.5 [26.6 to 42.1] vs 28.1 [21.6 to 38.4] mL/cm HO; p < 0.001). Following multivariable adjustment, higher ΔP had an independent association with higher 60-day mortality and less VFD-60 in both groups. Higher PEEP had an association with less VFD-60, but only in COVID-ARDS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show important differences in key ventilation parameters and associations thereof with outcomes between COVID-ARDS and CLASSIC-ARDS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT05650957), December 14, 2022.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(COVID-ARDS)患者与非 COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(CLASSIC-ARDS)患者的通气管理可能存在差异;目前尚不确定 CLASSIC-ARDS 患者的通气管理与结局之间的关联是否也存在于 COVID-ARDS 患者中。

方法

对 COVID-19 大流行期间进行的六项通气观察性研究和 COVID-19 大流行前进行的两项研究中 COVID-ARDS 和 CLASSIC-ARDS 患者的个体患者数据进行分析。使用描述性统计数据比较流行病学和通气特征。主要终点是关键通气参数;其他结局包括死亡率和无通气天数以及第 60 天存活(VFD-60)。

结果

该分析纳入了 6702 例 COVID-ARDS 患者和 1415 例 CLASSIC-ARDS 患者。COVID-ARDS 患者接受的中位潮气量(V)更低(6.6 [6.0 至 7.4] vs 7.3 [6.4 至 8.5] ml/kg 预测体重;p<0.001),接受的中位呼气末正压通气(PEEP)更高(12.0 [10.0 至 14.0] vs 8.0 [6.0 至 10.0] cm H2O;p<0.001),更低的中位跨肺压(ΔP)(13.0 [10.0 至 15.0] vs 16.0 [IQR 12.0 至 20.0] cm H2O;p<0.001)和更高的中位呼吸系统顺应性(Crs)(33.5 [26.6 至 42.1] vs 28.1 [21.6 至 38.4] mL/cm H2O;p<0.001)。在进行多变量调整后,两组患者的较高 ΔP 与较高的 60 天死亡率和较少的 VFD-60 独立相关。较高的 PEEP 与较少的 VFD-60 相关,但仅在 COVID-ARDS 患者中。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,COVID-ARDS 和 CLASSIC-ARDS 患者的关键通气参数及其与结局的关联存在重要差异。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov(标识符 NCT05650957),2022 年 12 月 14 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e4/11330602/14b0b9036e76/12931_2024_2910_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验