• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项在全科医疗中识别认知障碍老年患者以进行临床药师多重用药评估的试点研究。

A pilot study to identify elderly patients with cognitive impairment for clinical pharmacist polypharmacy review in General Practice.

作者信息

Mills Pamela, MacLure Katie

机构信息

NHS Ayrshire and Arran, United Kingdom.

Independent Research Consultant, Aberdeen AB32 6RU, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2021 Aug 26;3:100065. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100065. eCollection 2021 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100065
PMID:35480613
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9031366/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy in elderly patients is common with potential for harm. Cognitive impairment is postulated as the biggest contributor to poor medication management with increased risk of hospital admission. There is limited information about approaches to identify high risk patients for polypharmacy review.

OBJECTIVE

Pilot study to determine if a new patient prioritisation tool would identify appropriate patients for pharmacist polypharmacy review.

METHOD

Prioritisation tool developed to rank community-dwelling elderly patients prescribed 10 or more medications with cognitive impairment for pharmacist polypharmacy review. Tool used General Practice (GP) appointments, Emergency Department attendances, repeat medications and cognitive impairment to create a score to prioritise review invitations. Reviews were completed by GP clinical pharmacists who recorded interventions and measured outcome assessments using the adapted RiO scoring tool.

RESULTS

Polypharmacy reviews completed for 34 patients from three GP practices. Demographic results were 62% female ( = 21), median 78 years [IQR 72-80], median 3 comorbidities [IQR 2-4] with most reviews conducted face-to-face ( = 29; 85%). Pharmaceutical care interventions were hospital admission possible or likely prevention for the majority of patients (85%,  = 29) which contrasts with the historical level of 33% ( = 228) patients with traditional processes.

CONCLUSION

Pilot study demonstrated that the new tool identified appropriate patients for review prioritisation as patients had complex pharmaceutical care needs.

摘要

背景

老年患者多重用药现象普遍,存在潜在危害。认知障碍被认为是导致用药管理不善及住院风险增加的最大因素。关于识别多重用药审查高风险患者方法的信息有限。

目的

进行一项试点研究,以确定一种新的患者优先级工具能否识别出适合接受药剂师多重用药审查的患者。

方法

开发了一种优先级工具,用于对开具10种或更多药物且有认知障碍的社区老年患者进行排名,以便药剂师进行多重用药审查。该工具利用全科医疗(GP)预约、急诊科就诊、重复用药情况和认知障碍来创建一个分数,以确定审查邀请的优先级。审查由GP临床药剂师完成,他们记录干预措施,并使用改编后的RiO评分工具进行结果评估。

结果

对来自三个GP诊所的34名患者进行了多重用药审查。人口统计学结果显示,62%为女性(n = 21),年龄中位数为78岁[四分位间距72 - 80],合并症中位数为3种[四分位间距2 - 4],大多数审查是面对面进行的(n = 29;85%)。对于大多数患者(85%,n = 29),药物治疗护理干预措施是预防可能或很可能的住院情况,这与传统流程中33%(n = 228)的患者情况形成对比。

结论

试点研究表明,新工具能够识别出适合进行审查优先级排序的患者,因为这些患者有复杂的药物治疗护理需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a5/9031366/e01a2261aade/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a5/9031366/e01a2261aade/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83a5/9031366/e01a2261aade/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
A pilot study to identify elderly patients with cognitive impairment for clinical pharmacist polypharmacy review in General Practice.一项在全科医疗中识别认知障碍老年患者以进行临床药师多重用药评估的试点研究。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2021 Aug 26;3:100065. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100065. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Patient views about polypharmacy medication review clinics run by clinical pharmacists in GP practices.患者对全科医生诊所中临床药师开展的多药联合用药评估诊所的看法。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Dec;39(6):1162-1165. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0538-z. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
3
Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study.评价全科药师(GPP)干预以优化爱尔兰初级保健中的处方:一项非随机试点研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 28;10(6):e035087. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035087.
4
A shared medication scheme for community dwelling older patients with polypharmacy receiving home health care: role of the community pharmacist.针对接受家庭医疗护理且用药繁杂的社区老年患者的共享用药方案:社区药剂师的作用
Acta Clin Belg. 2019 Oct;74(5):326-333. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2018.1521903. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
5
Outcome prioritisation tool for medication review in older patients with multimorbidity: a pilot study in general practice.老年多病共存患者药物治疗评估的结局优先级工具:一项全科医疗的试点研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jul;67(660):e501-e506. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X690485. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
6
Partnered pharmacist charting on admission in the General Medical and Emergency Short-stay Unit - a cluster-randomised controlled trial in patients with complex medication regimens.在综合内科和急诊短期住院病房,由合作药剂师在患者入院时进行病历记录——一项针对用药方案复杂患者的整群随机对照试验。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Aug;41(4):414-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12405. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
7
Pharmacist consultations in general practice clinics: the Pharmacists in Practice Study (PIPS).全科诊所的药剂师咨询服务:实践中的药剂师研究(PIPS)
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Jul-Aug;10(4):623-32. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
8
Reduction of polypharmacy in the elderly: a systematic review of the role of the pharmacist.减少老年人多重用药:对药剂师作用的系统评价
Drugs Aging. 2003;20(11):817-32. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200320110-00003.
9
The standards of practice for delivery of polypharmacy and chronic disease medication reviews by general practice clinical pharmacists: a consensus study.全科临床药师提供复方用药和慢性病药物治疗审核的实践标准:一项共识研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Jun;44(3):663-672. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01387-7. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
10
Integrating clinical pharmacists within general practice: protocol for a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.将临床药师整合到全科医疗中:一项试点整群随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 22;11(3):e041541. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041541.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient prioritisation for hospital pharmacy services: current approaches in the UK.患者在医院药学服务中的优先排序:英国的当前方法。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(Suppl 2):e102-e108. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002365. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
2
An overview of prevalence, determinants and health outcomes of polypharmacy.多重用药的患病率、决定因素及健康结果概述。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020 Jun 12;11:2042098620933741. doi: 10.1177/2042098620933741. eCollection 2020.
3
Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol.
患者优先排序工具及其在非紧急医疗保健服务中的有效性:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 30;8(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0992-x.
4
Development and performance evaluation of the Medicines Optimisation Assessment Tool (MOAT): a prognostic model to target hospital pharmacists' input to prevent medication-related problems.药物优化评估工具(MOAT)的开发和性能评估:一种预测模型,旨在针对医院药师的投入,以预防与药物相关的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Aug;28(8):645-656. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008335. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
5
How hospital pharmacists prioritise patients at high-risk for medication harm.医院药剂师如何优先考虑高风险药物伤害的患者。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Oct;15(10):1266-1273. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
6
Patient prioritization for pharmaceutical care in hospital: A systematic review of assessment tools.患者在医院药物治疗中的优先排序:评估工具的系统评价。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jun;15(6):767-779. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
7
Medication Regimen Complexity Measured by MRCI: A Systematic Review to Identify Health Outcomes.用药方案复杂性测量工具 MRCI:一项系统评价以识别健康结局
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Nov;52(11):1117-1134. doi: 10.1177/1060028018773691. Epub 2018 May 13.
8
Outcome prioritisation tool for medication review in older patients with multimorbidity: a pilot study in general practice.老年多病共存患者药物治疗评估的结局优先级工具:一项全科医疗的试点研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jul;67(660):e501-e506. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X690485. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
9
Clinical Outcomes Associated with Medication Regimen Complexity in Older People: A Systematic Review.老年人药物治疗方案复杂性与临床结局的关联:系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Apr;65(4):747-753. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14682. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
10
Assessment of the elderly's functional ability to manage their medication: a systematic literature review.老年人管理药物的功能能力评估:系统文献回顾。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Feb;39(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0409-z. Epub 2016 Dec 10.