• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科临床药师提供复方用药和慢性病药物治疗审核的实践标准:一项共识研究。

The standards of practice for delivery of polypharmacy and chronic disease medication reviews by general practice clinical pharmacists: a consensus study.

机构信息

NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Renfrew Health and Social Care Centre, 10 Ferry Road, Renfrew, PA4 8RU, United Kingdom.

School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Sir Ian Wood Building, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Jun;44(3):663-672. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01387-7. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1007/s11096-022-01387-7
PMID:35320485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8941365/
Abstract

Background General practice in the UK is experiencing a crisis. Greater multidisciplinary working is a potential solution. The new general practice contract in Scotland encourages this and includes a new pharmacotherapy service to be delivered by General Practice Clinical Pharmacists (GPCPs). Consensus is lacking for the standards of practice for delivery of pharmacotherapy medication reviews (which are polypharmacy and chronic medication reviews) as part of this service. Aim To identify and validate standards of practice for polypharmacy and chronic disease medication (pharmacotherapy level 3) reviews conducted by GPCPs. Method A two-phased mixed-methods consensus methodology was used. Phase 1: An expert group of GPCPs (n = 4) and clinical pharmacist managers (n = 2) responsible for delivering the pharmacotherapy service used a Modified Nominal Group Technique to generate potential standards. Phase 2: Two-round Delphi survey involving GPCPs with ≥ 1 year of experience of working in general practice (n = 159). Results The expert group identified 44 potential standards of practice for polypharmacy and chronic disease reviews. Practicing GPCPs indicated during the Delphi phase that the 44 standards were applicable to practice. The standards of practice covered seven main categories: skills, environment, qualifications, qualities and behaviours, knowledge, process and experience. Conclusion Practicing GPCPs indicated that the standards identified by the expert group are acceptable and valid for current practice and the delivery of polypharmacy and chronic medication reviews. The application of these standards to practice may help GPCPs and general practices to ensure equitable delivery of patient care.

摘要

背景

英国的全科医学正面临危机。更多的多学科合作是潜在的解决方案。苏格兰新的全科医生合同鼓励这种合作,并包括由全科临床药剂师(GPCP)提供的新的药物治疗服务。对于作为该服务一部分的药物治疗药物评估(包括复方药物和慢性病药物评估)的实践标准,尚未达成共识。目的:确定并验证 GPCP 进行复方药物和慢性病药物(药物治疗 3 级)评估的实践标准。方法:采用两阶段混合方法共识方法。第 1 阶段:负责提供药物治疗服务的 GPCP(n=4)和临床药剂师经理(n=2)的专家组使用改良名义小组技术生成潜在标准。第 2 阶段:涉及具有至少 1 年在全科实践中工作经验的 GPCP(n=159)的两轮 Delphi 调查。结果:专家组确定了 44 项复方药物和慢性病评估的潜在实践标准。在 Delphi 阶段,执业 GPCP 表示这些 44 项标准适用于实践。实践标准涵盖了七个主要类别:技能、环境、资格、素质和行为、知识、过程和经验。结论:执业 GPCP 表示专家组确定的标准适用于当前实践,并且可用于提供复方药物和慢性病药物评估。将这些标准应用于实践可能有助于 GPCP 和全科医生确保公平地提供患者护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5360/9200690/350ea9b090bc/11096_2022_1387_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5360/9200690/350ea9b090bc/11096_2022_1387_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5360/9200690/350ea9b090bc/11096_2022_1387_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The standards of practice for delivery of polypharmacy and chronic disease medication reviews by general practice clinical pharmacists: a consensus study.全科临床药师提供复方用药和慢性病药物治疗审核的实践标准:一项共识研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Jun;44(3):663-672. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01387-7. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
2
Design of the POINT study: Pharmacotherapy Optimisation through Integration of a Non-dispensing pharmacist in a primary care Team (POINT).POINT研究的设计:通过在基层医疗团队中纳入非配药药剂师实现药物治疗优化(POINT)。
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Jul 2;16:76. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0296-8.
3
Efficiency versus thoroughness in medication review: a qualitative interview study in UK primary care.药物审查的效率与彻底性:英国初级医疗中的定性访谈研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Mar;69(680):e190-e198. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X701321. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
4
Implementation of pharmacist-led services in primary care: A mixed-methods exploration of pharmacists' perceptions of a national educational resource package.在初级保健中实施由药剂师主导的服务:对药剂师对国家教育资源包看法的混合方法探索
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021 Jul-Sep;19(3):2440. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.3.2440. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
5
Analysis of polypharmacy in older patients in primary care using a multidisciplinary expert panel.使用多学科专家小组对基层医疗中老年患者的多重用药情况进行分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Jul;56(528):504-10.
6
Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study.评价全科药师(GPP)干预以优化爱尔兰初级保健中的处方:一项非随机试点研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 28;10(6):e035087. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035087.
7
Capturing pharmacists' impact in general practice: an e-Delphi study to attempt to reach consensus amongst experts about what activities to record.捕捉药剂师在全科医疗中的影响:一项电子德尔菲研究,旨在尝试在专家中达成共识,确定应记录哪些活动。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Sep 9;20(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1008-6.
8
Pharmacist consultations in general practice clinics: the Pharmacists in Practice Study (PIPS).全科诊所的药剂师咨询服务:实践中的药剂师研究(PIPS)
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Jul-Aug;10(4):623-32. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
9
A systematic review of general practice-based pharmacists' services to optimize medicines management in older people with multimorbidity and polypharmacy.基于全科实践的药师服务优化多病共存和多种药物治疗老年人药物管理的系统评价
Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 28;38(4):509-523. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa146.
10
Patient views about polypharmacy medication review clinics run by clinical pharmacists in GP practices.患者对全科医生诊所中临床药师开展的多药联合用药评估诊所的看法。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Dec;39(6):1162-1165. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0538-z. Epub 2017 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing Soft Skills for Sustainable Community Pharmacy Practice Through a Competency-Based Modular Programme.通过基于能力的模块化课程培养可持续社区药学实践的软技能。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2025 Aug 20;13(4):110. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy13040110.
2
Perceived importance of tailored education to prevent second victim phenomenon in clinical pharmacy practice: a focus group study with community pharmacists.量身定制教育对预防临床药学实践中“二次受害者”现象的重要性认知:一项针对社区药剂师的焦点小组研究
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Aug 15. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01987-z.
3
Optimizing chronic disease management through community-based pharmaceutical care for older adults in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness and impact on performance of pharmacy-related competency development frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis.药学相关能力发展框架的效果和对绩效的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Oct;17(10):1685-1696. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
2
Workforce experience of the implementation of an advanced clinical practice framework in England: a mixed methods evaluation.英格兰实施高级临床实践框架的劳动力经验:混合方法评估。
Hum Resour Health. 2020 Dec 3;18(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-00539-y.
3
A global survey on trends in advanced practice and specialisation in the pharmacy workforce.
通过中国社区药学服务优化老年人慢性病管理:随机对照试验的系统评价与Meta分析
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01951-x.
4
Interdisciplinary medication reviews of psychiatric patients - A mixed method evaluation.精神科患者的跨学科药物评估——一项混合方法评估。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2025 Mar 2;18:100584. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100584. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
The second victim experience and support tool: a cross-cultural adaptation, validation and psychometric evaluation of the Serbian version for pharmacy professionals (SR-SVEST-R).第二个受害者体验与支持工具:针对药剂师专业人员的塞尔维亚语版本(SR-SVEST-R)的跨文化改编、验证及心理测量学评估
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Jun;47(3):803-814. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01875-6. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
6
Addressing the second victim phenomenon among community pharmacists and its impact on clinical pharmacy practice: a consensus study.解决社区药剂师中的二次受害者现象及其对临床药学实践的影响:一项共识研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Feb;47(1):68-79. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01807-w. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
7
Construction of a pharmaceutical care mode for cancer pain patients in primary care based on the Delphi method: an effective analysis.基于德尔菲法构建基层医疗中癌症疼痛患者的药学服务模式:效果分析
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Nov 21;14:1268793. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1268793. eCollection 2023.
8
What makes a multidisciplinary medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people work well in primary care? A realist review and synthesis.多学科药物审查和减少老年人用药干预措施在初级保健中为何能良好运行?一项实际审查和综合研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 25;23(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04256-8.
关于药学劳动力中高级实践和专业化趋势的全球调查。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2020 Apr;28(2):173-181. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12611.
4
A cross-sectional survey of the pharmacy workforce in general practice in Scotland.苏格兰普通实践中的药剂师劳动力的横断面调查。
Fam Pract. 2020 Mar 25;37(2):206-212. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz052.
5
Barriers to pharmacist prescribing: a scoping review comparing the UK, New Zealand, Canadian and Australian experiences.药剂师开处方的障碍:一项比较英国、新西兰、加拿大和澳大利亚经验的范围综述。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2019 Dec;27(6):479-489. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12557. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
6
Skill-mix change in general practice: a qualitative comparison of three 'new' non-medical roles in English primary care.全科医生技能组合的变化:英国初级保健中三种“新”非医疗角色的定性比较。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jul;69(684):e489-e498. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704117. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
7
2018 Hematology/Oncology Pharmacist Association Best Practices for the Management of Oral Oncolytic Therapy: Pharmacy Practice Standard.2018 年血液病/肿瘤药师协会口腔肿瘤治疗管理最佳实践:药学实践标准。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Apr;15(4):e346-e355. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00581. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
8
A pharmacist framework for implementation of the Canadian Guideline for Opioids for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain.一个用于实施《加拿大慢性非癌性疼痛阿片类药物指南》的药剂师框架。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2019 Jan 3;152(1):35-44. doi: 10.1177/1715163518818200. eCollection 2019 Jan-Feb.
9
A non-randomised controlled pilot study of clinical pharmacist collaborative intervention for community dwelling patients with COPD.一项针对社区居住的 COPD 患者的临床药师合作干预的非随机对照初步研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2018 Oct 10;28(1):38. doi: 10.1038/s41533-018-0105-7.
10
Releasing GP capacity with pharmacy prescribing support and New Ways of Working: a prospective observational cohort study.利用药剂师处方支持和新工作方式释放全科医生的能力:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Oct;68(675):e735-e742. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X699137.