Lekagul Angkana, Tangcharoensathien Viroj, Yeung Shunmay
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; International Health Policy Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
International Health Policy Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Nov 15;160:85-98. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
Overuse of antimicrobials in both humans and animals is recognized as one of the main drivers of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR); and the optimisation of their use has been advocated as a key strategy for dealing with AMR. The measurement of antimicrobial use is vital for the design, monitoring and evaluation of such strategies. This systematic review describes and compares methods and measurements used to quantify antimicrobial use in pigs in order to inform efforts to standardize measurement.
The peer-reviewed literature was systematically searched using four online databases: MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria for inclusion in the review included: articles published in English, involving pigs of any age and types of production, providing quantitative data on antimicrobial use, containing a clear description of the methodology, and having moderate to high rank in the quality assessment.
Of 2,362 abstracts reviewed, a total of 25 studies were included based on the eligibility criteria. All studies were published between 2001 and 2017. Twenty of the studies were conducted in eight European countries. Twelve studies estimated antimicrobial use and eight studies were primarily methodological papers comparing different methods or variables, or developing new methods. The two main sources of antimicrobial use data were farm surveys and national sales data. A large variety of units of measurement was found. In this review, the ten measurements identified were categorized into four groups: 1) antimicrobials use measured by milligrams of active substance per animal weight; 2) antimicrobials use measured by daily dose per weight at treatment; 3) antimicrobial use measured by daily dose per treatment period; and 4) antimicrobials use measured by daily dose per period at risk of treatment.
There is no global standardized measurement of antimicrobial use in pigs. Given the importance of monitoring the use antimicrobials, we recommend that at a minimum, all countries should develop macro-level monitoring using national sales data and report use by milligram of active ingredients per Population Correcting Unit. Monitoring in specific animal species requires the development of systems to capture prescription at national or farm level. Findings from monitoring antimicrobial use may help to guide effective interventions for optimising use of antimicrobials, as recommended by the WHO Global Action Plan on AMR.
人类和动物中抗菌药物的过度使用被认为是抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)的主要驱动因素之一;优化抗菌药物的使用已被倡导为应对AMR的关键策略。抗菌药物使用的测量对于此类策略的设计、监测和评估至关重要。本系统评价描述并比较了用于量化猪抗菌药物使用的方法和测量指标,以便为标准化测量的努力提供信息。
使用四个在线数据库(MEDLINE、ScienceDirect、Scopus和Web of Science)对同行评审文献进行系统检索。纳入本评价的合格标准包括:以英文发表的文章,涉及任何年龄和生产类型的猪,提供抗菌药物使用的定量数据,包含方法学的清晰描述,并且在质量评估中具有中等到高的排名。
在审查的2362篇摘要中,根据合格标准共纳入25项研究。所有研究均发表于2001年至2017年之间。其中20项研究在八个欧洲国家进行。12项研究估计了抗菌药物的使用情况,8项研究主要是比较不同方法或变量或开发新方法的方法学论文。抗菌药物使用数据的两个主要来源是农场调查和国家销售数据。发现了各种各样的测量单位。在本评价中,确定的十种测量指标分为四组:1)按每动物体重的活性物质毫克数测量的抗菌药物使用量;2)按治疗时每体重每日剂量测量的抗菌药物使用量;3)按每个治疗期每日剂量测量的抗菌药物使用量;4)按每个治疗风险期每日剂量测量的抗菌药物使用量。
目前尚无全球统一的猪抗菌药物使用标准化测量方法。鉴于监测抗菌药物使用的重要性,我们建议所有国家至少应利用国家销售数据开展宏观层面的监测,并按每校正种群单位的活性成分毫克数报告使用情况。对特定动物物种的监测需要开发在国家或农场层面获取处方的系统。如世界卫生组织AMR全球行动计划所建议的,监测抗菌药物使用的结果可能有助于指导优化抗菌药物使用的有效干预措施。