Suppr超能文献

印度 3 个邦医学院校基本的循证产时保健实践评估:混合方法研究。

Baseline Assessment of Evidence-Based Intrapartum Care Practices in Medical Schools in 3 States in India: A Mixed-Methods Study.

机构信息

United Nations Population Fund, New Delhi, India.

Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Apr 29;10(2). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00590. Print 2022 Apr 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Implementation research with pre- and post-comparison was planned to improve the quality of evidence-based intrapartum care services in Indian medical schools. We present the baseline study results to assess the status of adherence to intrapartum evidence-based practices (IP-EBP) in study schools in 3 states in India and the perception of the faculty.

METHODS

A concurrent mixed-methods approach was used to conduct the baseline assessment in 9 medical schools in Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Union Territory from October 2018 to June 2019. IP-EBP among pregnant women in uncomplicated first (n=135), second (n=120), and third stage (n=120) of labor were observed using a predesigned, pretested checklist quantitatively. We conducted in-depth interviews with 33 obstetrics and gynecology faculty to understand their perceptions of intrapartum practices. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS (version 22). COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Behavior) model was used to understand the behaviors, and thematic analysis was done for the qualitative data.

FINDINGS

Unindicated augmentation of labor was done in 64.4%, fundal pressure applied in 50.8%, episiotomy done in 58.3%, and delivery in lithotomy position was performed in 86.7% of women in labor.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrapartum practices that are not recommended were routinely practiced in the study medical schools due to a lack of staff awareness of evidence-based practices and incorrect beliefs about their impact.

摘要

简介

为了提高印度医学院校基于证据的分娩护理服务质量,计划进行预对照实施研究。我们呈现基线研究结果,以评估印度 3 个邦和联邦属地的研究学校中遵循产时基于证据的实践(IP-EBP)的情况和教师的看法。

方法

采用同期混合方法,于 2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 6 月在拉贾斯坦邦、古吉拉特邦和联邦属地的 9 所医学院进行基线评估。使用预先设计的预测试清单对无并发症的第一产程(n=135)、第二产程(n=120)和第三产程(n=120)的孕妇进行 IP-EBP 观察。我们对 33 名妇产科教师进行深入访谈,以了解他们对分娩实践的看法。使用 SPSS(版本 22)对定量数据进行分析。使用 COM-B(能力、机会和动机行为)模型来理解行为,并对定性数据进行主题分析。

结果

64.4%的产妇未经指征行催产素点滴,50.8%的产妇行宫底按压,58.3%的产妇行会阴切开术,86.7%的产妇行截石位分娩。

结论

由于医护人员对基于证据的实践缺乏认识以及对其影响的错误看法,研究中的医学院校常规进行不推荐的产时实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29e9/9053154/2355f85dcdb1/GH-GHSP220045F001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验