Suppr超能文献

早期前列腺癌不同放疗方案的急性副作用。

Acute Side-effects of Different Radiotherapy Treatment Schedules in Early Prostate Cancer.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tampere Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland;

Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2022 May;42(5):2553-2565. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15733.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal radiation therapy (RT) fractionation in early prostate cancer in elderly patients is controversial. We compared acute toxicities of fractionation schedules: 78/2 Gy, 60/3 Gy and 36.25/7.25 Gy, in this single-centre study. We also evaluated the effect of the rectal immobilization system Rectafix on quality of life (QoL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-three patients with one or two intermediate prostate cancer risk factors according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria were recruited. Twenty-one patients were treated with 78/2 Gy and 60/3 Gy, and 31 patients with 36.25/7.25 Gy. Their QoL data were assessed with regard to genitourinary, gastrointestinal and sexual wellbeing at the beginning and end of RT and at 3 months after treatment. Rectafix was used in the 78/2 Gy and 60/3 Gy groups.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant QoL differences in between the treatment groups 3 months after RT. The 78/2 Gy group had significantly increased bowel movements between baseline and 3 months after RT (p=0.036). At 3 months after RT, this group also had significantly more erectile dysfunction than the 60/3 Gy group (p=0.025). At the end of RT, the 78/2 Gy group had more symptoms than the 36.25/7.25 Gy group. Rectafix did not reduce acute toxicities in the 78/2 Gy or 60/3 Gy groups.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with the 78/2 Gy schedule is no longer to be recommended due to its increased acute toxicity compared to treatments of 60/3 Gy and 36.25/7.25 Gy. The shortest schedule of 36.25 Gy in five fractions seems to be a convenient treatment option with tolerable acute toxicity.

摘要

背景

在老年早期前列腺癌患者中,最佳的放射治疗(RT)分割方案存在争议。我们比较了 78/2 Gy、60/3 Gy 和 36.25/7.25 Gy 这三种分割方案的急性毒性,这项单中心研究共纳入了 73 例符合美国国家综合癌症网络标准的单或双中危前列腺癌患者。21 例患者接受 78/2 Gy 和 60/3 Gy 治疗,31 例患者接受 36.25/7.25 Gy 治疗。治疗开始、结束时和治疗结束后 3 个月评估患者的生活质量(QoL),包括泌尿生殖、胃肠道和性功能。78/2 Gy 和 60/3 Gy 组采用 Rectafix 进行直肠固定。

结果

RT 结束后 3 个月,各组患者的 QoL 数据无统计学差异。与治疗前相比,78/2 Gy 组在 RT 结束后 3 个月时的排便次数明显增加(p=0.036)。同时,该组在 RT 结束后 3 个月时的勃起功能障碍也明显多于 60/3 Gy 组(p=0.025)。RT 结束时,78/2 Gy 组的症状比 36.25/7.25 Gy 组更严重。在 78/2 Gy 和 60/3 Gy 组中,Rectafix 并未降低急性毒性。

结论

与 60/3 Gy 和 36.25/7.25 Gy 方案相比,78/2 Gy 方案的急性毒性增加,因此不再推荐使用该方案。最短的 36.25 Gy 五分割方案似乎是一种方便且具有可耐受急性毒性的治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验