Vâţă Andrei, Anita Adriana, Manciuc Carmen Doina, Savuta Gheorghe, Luca Catalina Mihaela, Roșu Florin Manuel, Mihai Ioana Florina, Anita Dragos
Department of Infectious Diseases, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iași 700116, Romania.
Ion Ionescu de la Brad University of Life Sciences, Regional Center of Advanced Research for Emerging Diseases, Zoonoses and Food Safety (ROVETEMERG), Iași 700490, Romania.
Exp Ther Med. 2022 Jun;23(6):391. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11318. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
Controlling the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) includes institute isolation, quarantine measures and appropriate clinical management, which all require effective screening, diagnostic and prognostic tools. The present study aimed to analyze severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)A detection and determine the potential association with the clinical course of COVID-19 and the levels of inflammation. In the present study, the presence of IgA and IgG SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in 75 consecutive patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection was investigated. No significant differences were found between the IgA positive and negative groups, regarding the presence of symptoms, haematological and inflammatory variables, or the presence of pneumonia. In the majority of cases, antibody detection was comparable, for example, 79.7% of patients in the IgA positive group exhibited both types of antibodies, while 80.9% of patients in the IgA negative group were also IgG negative. A total of four patients in the IgA negative group presented with anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Early detection of IgA was more frequent in patients who later developed severe forms of the disease. In addition, the IgG SARS-CoV-2 antibody response was higher in patients with the severe form of the disease.
控制2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的传播包括实施隔离、检疫措施以及适当的临床管理,而所有这些都需要有效的筛查、诊断和预后工具。本研究旨在分析严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)特异性免疫球蛋白(Ig)A检测情况,并确定其与COVID-19临床病程及炎症水平之间的潜在关联。在本研究中,对75例连续确诊的COVID-19感染患者体内SARS-CoV-2 IgA和IgG抗体的存在情况进行了调查。在症状的存在、血液学和炎症变量或肺炎的存在方面,IgA阳性组和阴性组之间未发现显著差异。在大多数情况下,抗体检测结果相当,例如,IgA阳性组中79.7%的患者两种抗体均呈阳性,而IgA阴性组中80.9%的患者IgG也呈阴性。IgA阴性组共有4例患者出现抗SARS-CoV-2 IgG抗体。在后来发展为重症的患者中,IgA的早期检测更为常见。此外,重症患者体内SARS-CoV-2 IgG抗体反应更高。