Zhao Xingqi, Tang Wenli, Wan Haoyang, Lan Zixin, Qin Hanjun, Lin Qingrong, Hu Yanjun, Yu Guangchuang, Jiang Nan, Yu Bin
Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bone and Cartilage Regenerative Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 14;13:723791. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.723791. eCollection 2022.
Preoperative diagnosis of fracture-related infection (FRI) is difficult for patients without obvious signs of infection. However, specific profiles of gut microbiota may be used as a potential diagnostic tool for FRI as suggested by a previous study. The fecal microbiome was compared between 20 FRI patients (FRI group), 18 fracture healed patients (FH group), and 12 healthy controls (HC group) included after collection of fecal samples and evaluation. The α and β diversity indices were used to characterize the fecal microbiome. Dysbiosis indexes were constructed based on the characteristic high-dimensional biomarkers identified in the fecal microbiota from the three groups by linear discriminant analysis and generalized linear model analysis to quantify the dysbiosis of fecal microbiota. The effectiveness of α and β diversity indices and dysbiosis indexes was assessed in distinguishing the fecal microbiome among the three groups. The influences of serum inflammatory factors on gut microbiota were also addressed. The α diversity indices were significantly different between the three groups, the highest in HC group and the lowest in FRI group ( < 0.05). The β diversity indices showed significant phylogenetic dissimilarity of gut microbiome composition among the three groups ( < 0.001). The dysbiosis indexes were significantly higher in FRI group than in FH and HC groups ( < 0.001). The area under Receiver operating characteristic curve showed the characteristics of gut microbiota and the gut microbiota was found as effective in distinguishing the three groups. The dysbiosis in the FRI patients was associated with systemic inflammatory factors. In addition, significant differences in the gut microbiota were not observed between the FRI patients versus without sinus tract or pus before operation. Since FRI patients, with or without sinus tract or pus, have a characteristic profile of gut microbiota, their gut microbiota may be used as an auxiliary diagnostic tool for suspected FRI.
对于没有明显感染迹象的患者,骨折相关感染(FRI)的术前诊断很困难。然而,先前的一项研究表明,肠道微生物群的特定特征可用作FRI的潜在诊断工具。在收集粪便样本并进行评估后,对20例FRI患者(FRI组)、18例骨折愈合患者(FH组)和12名健康对照者(HC组)的粪便微生物群进行了比较。使用α和β多样性指数来表征粪便微生物群。基于通过线性判别分析和广义线性模型分析在三组粪便微生物群中鉴定出的特征性高维生物标志物构建失调指数,以量化粪便微生物群的失调情况。评估了α和β多样性指数以及失调指数在区分三组粪便微生物群方面的有效性。还探讨了血清炎症因子对肠道微生物群的影响。三组之间的α多样性指数存在显著差异,HC组最高,FRI组最低(<0.05)。β多样性指数显示三组之间肠道微生物群组成存在显著的系统发育差异(<0.001)。FRI组的失调指数显著高于FH组和HC组(<0.001)。受试者工作特征曲线下面积显示了肠道微生物群的特征,并且发现肠道微生物群在区分三组方面有效。FRI患者的失调与全身炎症因子有关。此外,术前有或没有窦道或脓液的FRI患者之间未观察到肠道微生物群的显著差异。由于有或没有窦道或脓液的FRI患者都有特征性的肠道微生物群特征,其肠道微生物群可用作疑似FRI的辅助诊断工具。