Suppr超能文献

两种眼压计在评估甲状腺相关性眼病患者24小时眼压和平均眼灌注压中的比较

Comparison of Two Tonometers in the Evaluation of 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure and Mean Ocular Perfusion Pressure in Patients with Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy.

作者信息

Liu Weijie, Zhou Yao, Hu Xiaozhou, Jin Haochen, Ye Jie, Xu Mingna, Liu Zihui, Wu Wencan, Tu Yunhai

机构信息

The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

出版信息

J Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 22;2022:8628362. doi: 10.1155/2022/8628362. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to compare a non-contact tonometer (NCT) and goldmann applannation tonometer (GAT) in the evaluation of intraocular pressure (IOP) and mean ocular perfusion pressure (MOPP) in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO).

METHODS

In this study, a total of 30 patients (16 females and 14 males) were recruited. All patients underwent a routine ophthalmic assessment and their medical history was acquired. Clinical assessment included the 24-hour measurement of intraocular pressure and blood pressure, an orbital computed tomography (CT) scan, and a visual field (VF)test. Patients were divided into two groups according to their visual field test results: a defect group with mean deviation (MD) of visual field -2 dB or lower and a normal group with MD over -2 dB.

RESULTS

Bland-Altman's analysis showed similar results of IOP at every time point and revealed an agreement of mean IOP between the two tonometers (the deviation in the mean IOP between the two tonometers was 1 mmHg, with 95% limits of agreement of 8.8 to -6.8 mmHg). The 24-hour MOPP SD value in NCT (2.28) and GAT (1.77) showed that the two instruments had the same diagnostic efficacy (100% sensitivity, 95.8% specificity). The areas under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of the 24-hour mean ocular perfusion pressure (MOPP) SD (GAT: 0.778, NCT: 0.713;  = 0.669, =0.504), 24-hour MOPP fluctuation (GAT:0.683, NCT:0.757;  = 0.963, =0.336) measured by GAT and NCT had no significant difference between the two tonometers.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement of IOPs, MOPPs, and their diagnostic efficacy of visual field defect showed consistency between NCT and GAT. The study highlights the importance of monitoring the 24-hour MOPP and IOP in TAO patients. Furthermore, it suggests that the less invasive NCT can replace GAT as a long-term monitoring device in TAO patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较非接触眼压计(NCT)和Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)在评估甲状腺相关眼病(TAO)患者眼压(IOP)和平均眼灌注压(MOPP)方面的差异。

方法

本研究共纳入30例患者(16例女性,14例男性)。所有患者均接受常规眼科评估并获取其病史。临床评估包括24小时眼压和血压测量、眼眶计算机断层扫描(CT)以及视野(VF)检查。根据视野检查结果将患者分为两组:视野平均偏差(MD)为-2dB或更低的缺损组和MD超过-2dB的正常组。

结果

Bland-Altman分析显示,各时间点的眼压测量结果相似,且两种眼压计的平均眼压具有一致性(两种眼压计平均眼压的偏差为1mmHg,95%一致性界限为8.8至-6.8mmHg)。NCT(2.28)和GAT(1.77)测量的24小时MOPP标准差表明,两种仪器具有相同的诊断效能(敏感性100%,特异性95.8%)。GAT和NCT测量的24小时平均眼灌注压(MOPP)标准差的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(GAT:0.778,NCT:0.713;P=0.669,P=0.5)、24小时MOPP波动(GAT:0.683,NCT:0.757;P=0.963,P=0.336)在两种眼压计之间无显著差异。

结论

NCT和GAT在眼压、MOPP测量及其视野缺损诊断效能方面具有一致性。该研究强调了监测TAO患者24小时MOPP和IOP的重要性。此外,研究表明侵入性较小的NCT可替代GAT作为TAO患者的长期监测设备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/128d/9054469/2ea207abe616/JOPH2022-8628362.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验