Suppr超能文献

健康受试者坐位与卧位眼压差异的测量:Icare Pro眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计、气动眼压计和Tonopen XL眼压计的直接比较

Measurement of the difference in intraocular pressure between the sitting and lying body positions in healthy subjects: direct comparison of the Icare Pro with the Goldmann applanation tonometer, Pneumatonometer and Tonopen XL.

作者信息

Barkana Yaniv, Gutfreund Shay

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.

出版信息

Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep-Oct;42(7):608-14. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12272. Epub 2014 Jan 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Change in intraocular pressure is known to occur with body posture. Previously, markedly different estimations of this change were reported. The Icare Pro (Icare; Tiolat Oy, Helsinki, Finland) is designed to measure intraocular pressure with the subject supine. We compared the measurement of postural change in intraocular pressure obtained with this and 3 other tonometers: Goldmann applanation tonometer (CSO, Firenze, Italy), Pneumatonometer (Model 30, Reichert, Depew, NY, USA) and the Tonopen XL (Reichert).

DESIGN

Prospective comparative study.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-one healthy subjects.

METHODS

Intraocular pressure was measured in random order with four tonometers, first sitting then after 10 min of lying.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Average postural intraocular pressure change (mmHg) and the 95% limits of agreement for measuring postural intraocular pressure change between tonometers.

RESULTS

Average postural intraocular pressure change (lying minus sitting, mmHg) was measured highest with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (4.1 ± 2.6) and Pneumatonometer (3.9 ± 2.1), significantly lower with the Tonopen (0.9 ± 1.7) and was negative with the Icare (-0.9 ± 3.3). The 95% limits of agreement for measuring postural intraocular pressure change between Goldmann applanation tonometer and Icare, Pneumatonometer and Tonopen were -3.2-13.3, -6.4-6.9 and -2.8-9.4 mmHg, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Postural change in intraocular pressure was measured similarly, on average, with Goldmann applanation tonometer and Pneumatonometer, and much lower with Tonopen and Icare Pro. There was poor interdevice agreement in measuring this parameter. We observed high intersubject variability, suggesting the clinical importance of this measurement in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma.

摘要

背景

已知眼压会随身体姿势发生变化。此前,关于这种变化的估计差异显著。Icare Pro眼压计(芬兰赫尔辛基的Tiolat Oy公司生产)设计用于在受试者仰卧位时测量眼压。我们比较了使用该眼压计与其他三种眼压计测量姿势性眼压变化的情况:Goldmann压平眼压计(意大利佛罗伦萨的CSO公司生产)、气动眼压计(美国纽约州迪皮尤的Reichert公司生产的30型)和Tonopen XL眼压计(Reichert公司生产)。

设计

前瞻性对比研究。

参与者

21名健康受试者。

方法

使用四种眼压计以随机顺序测量眼压,先在坐位测量,然后在卧位10分钟后测量。

主要观察指标

姿势性眼压变化的平均值(mmHg)以及各眼压计测量姿势性眼压变化的95%一致性界限。

结果

Goldmann压平眼压计(4.1±2.6)和气动眼压计(3.9±2.1)测量的姿势性眼压变化平均值(卧位减去坐位,mmHg)最高,Tonopen眼压计(0.9±1.7)显著较低,Icare眼压计(-0.9±3.3)为负值。Goldmann压平眼压计与Icare眼压计、气动眼压计与Tonopen眼压计测量姿势性眼压变化的95%一致性界限分别为-3.2至13.3、-6.4至6.9和-2.8至9.4 mmHg。

结论

Goldmann压平眼压计和气动眼压计测量的姿势性眼压变化平均值相近,而Tonopen眼压计和Icare Pro眼压计测量值低得多。在测量该参数时,不同仪器间的一致性较差。我们观察到受试者间变异性较高,提示该测量在青光眼诊断和管理中的临床重要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验