Johanna Catherine Maclean, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Allison Witman, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, North Carolina.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 May;41(5):703-712. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01755.
We studied the effect of state punitive and supportive prenatal substance use policies on reports of infant maltreatment to child protection agencies. Punitive policies criminalize prenatal substance use or define it as child maltreatment, whereas supportive policies provide pregnant women with priority access to substance use disorder treatment programs. Using difference-in-differences methods, we found that total infant maltreatment reports increased by 19.0 percent after punitive policy adoption during the years of our study (2004-18). This growth was driven by a 38.4 percent increase in substantiated reports in which the mother was the alleged perpetrator. There were no changes in unsubstantiated reports after the adoption of punitive policies. We observed no changes in infant maltreatment reports after the adoption of supportive policies. Findings suggest that punitive policies lead to large increases in substantiated infant maltreatment reports, which in turn may lead to child welfare system involvement soon after childbirth in states with these policies. Policy makers should design interventions that emphasize support services and improve well-being for mothers and infants.
我们研究了州立惩罚性和支持性产前物质使用政策对向儿童保护机构报告婴儿虐待的影响。惩罚性政策将产前物质使用定为犯罪或定义为虐待儿童,而支持性政策则为孕妇提供优先获得物质使用障碍治疗计划的机会。使用差分法,我们发现,在我们研究的年份(2004-18 年)中,采用惩罚性政策后,婴儿虐待总报告增加了 19.0%。这一增长是由母亲被指为施害者的证实报告增加了 38.4%驱动的。在采用惩罚性政策后,未证实的报告没有变化。在采用支持性政策后,婴儿虐待报告没有变化。研究结果表明,惩罚性政策导致证实的婴儿虐待报告大幅增加,这反过来可能导致在实施这些政策的州,在分娩后不久就涉及儿童福利系统。政策制定者应设计强调支持服务和改善母亲和婴儿福祉的干预措施。