Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症患者和普通人群暴力行为的不同途径。

Separate pathways to violent behavior in schizophrenia and in the general population.

机构信息

The Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Rd, Orangeburg, NY, 10962, USA; New York University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, USA.

The Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Rd, Orangeburg, NY, 10962, USA.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Jul;151:235-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.04.016. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

Abstract

Violence in schizophrenia is best investigated within the broader context of violent behavior in the general population. Two important domains of general pathology which allow us to take such an approach include impairment in emotion processing, as manifested by faulty facial emotion recognition, and aggressive reactivity which consists of heightened sensitivity to provocation. To test this approach, we included 135 subjects: 38 violent (VS's) and 33 nonviolent patients with schizophrenia, 32 healthy controls and 32 non-psychotic violent subjects (NPV's). We measured violence with the Life History of Aggression Scale, recognition of facial emotions with the Emotion Recognition Task, and aggressive reactivity through the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Adolescent antisocial behavior was evaluated as a potential precursor to these deficits. We found that impairment in fear recognition (IFR) and aggressive reactivity have a significant effect on violence in the violent groups. These two impairments interact in different ways in these groups. In NPV's they contribute in an additive fashion to violence, whereas in VS's they represent separate pathways; aggressive reactivity leads to violence only when there is no IFR. Adolescent antisocial behavior has a differential effect on these 2 impairments in the 2 groups. Thus, these findings provide insights on the differential role of IFR and aggressive reactivity for violence in schizophrenia compared to the general population. In NPV's, both dysfunctions represent antisocial features and contribute jointly to violence. In schizophrenia, they have different etiologies and constitute alternative pathways to violence. This has important implications for the conceptualization and treatment of violence.

摘要

精神分裂症中的暴力行为最好在一般人群中的暴力行为的更广泛背景下进行研究。两个允许我们采取这种方法的重要一般病理学领域包括情绪处理受损,表现为面部情绪识别错误,以及攻击性反应性增加,即对挑衅的敏感性增加。为了检验这种方法,我们纳入了 135 名受试者:38 名暴力(VS)和 33 名非暴力精神分裂症患者、32 名健康对照者和 32 名非精神病性暴力受试者(NPV)。我们使用生活史攻击量表测量暴力,使用情绪识别任务测量面部情绪识别,使用 Buss-Perry 攻击问卷测量攻击性反应。青少年反社会行为被评估为这些缺陷的潜在前兆。我们发现,恐惧识别(IFR)和攻击性反应性受损对暴力组的暴力行为有显著影响。这两种损伤在这些组中以不同的方式相互作用。在 NPV 中,它们以相加的方式导致暴力,而在 VS 中,它们代表不同的途径;只有当没有 IFR 时,攻击性反应才会导致暴力。青少年反社会行为对这两组中的这两种损伤有不同的影响。因此,这些发现为精神分裂症患者与一般人群相比,IFR 和攻击性反应性对暴力的不同作用提供了深入了解。在 NPV 中,这两种功能障碍都代表反社会特征,共同导致暴力。在精神分裂症中,它们具有不同的病因,构成了暴力的替代途径。这对暴力的概念化和治疗具有重要意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验