Cottle Chasen, Porter Amanda Paige, Lipat Ariel, Turner-Lyles Caitlin, Nguyen Jimmy, Moll Guido, Chinnadurai Raghavan
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, Savannah, GA USA.
BIH Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT) and Berlin Brandenburg School of Regenerative Therapies (BSRT), Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität zu Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Curr Stem Cell Rep. 2022;8(2):72-92. doi: 10.1007/s40778-022-00212-1. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
Cryopreservation and its associated freezing and thawing procedures-short "freeze-thawing"-are among the final steps in economically viable manufacturing and clinical application of diverse cellular therapeutics. Translation from preclinical proof-of-concept studies to larger clinical trials has indicated that these processes may potentially present an Achilles heel to optimal cell product safety and particularly efficacy in clinical trials and routine use.
We review the current state of the literature on how cryopreservation of cellular therapies has evolved and how the application of this technique to different cell types is interlinked with their ability to engraft and function upon transfer in vivo, in particular for hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), their progeny, and therapeutic cell products derived thereof. We also discuss pros and cons how this may differ for non-hematopoietic mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (MSC) therapeutics. We present different avenues that may be crucial for cell therapy optimization, both, for hematopoietic (e.g., effector, regulatory, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T and NK cell based products) and for non-hematopoietic products, such as MSCs and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), to achieve optimal viability, recovery, effective cell dose, and functionality of the cryorecovered cells.
Targeted research into optimizing the cryopreservation and freeze-thawing routines and the adjunct manufacturing process design may provide crucial advantages to increase both the safety and efficacy of cellular therapeutics in clinical use and to enable effective market deployment strategies to become economically viable and sustainable medicines.
冷冻保存及其相关的冷冻和解冻程序——简称“冻融”——是多种细胞疗法在经济上可行的制造和临床应用的最后步骤之一。从临床前概念验证研究到更大规模的临床试验表明,这些过程可能是最佳细胞产品安全性的致命弱点,尤其是在临床试验和常规使用中的疗效。
我们综述了关于细胞疗法冷冻保存如何发展以及该技术在不同细胞类型中的应用如何与其在体内转移后的植入和功能能力相关联的文献现状,特别是对于造血干细胞和祖细胞(HSPCs)、它们的后代以及由此衍生的治疗性细胞产品。我们还讨论了对于非造血间充质基质/干细胞(MSC)疗法而言,情况可能有何不同的利弊。我们提出了不同的途径,这些途径对于细胞疗法的优化可能至关重要,无论是对于造血产品(例如基于效应细胞、调节性细胞和嵌合抗原受体(CAR)修饰的T细胞和NK细胞的产品)还是对于非造血产品,如MSC和诱导多能干细胞(iPSC),以实现冷冻复苏细胞的最佳活力、回收率、有效细胞剂量和功能。
针对优化冷冻保存和冻融程序以及辅助制造工艺设计的定向研究,可能为提高细胞疗法在临床应用中的安全性和疗效提供关键优势,并使有效的市场部署策略成为经济上可行和可持续的药物。