Yang Song, He Wen, Li Yi, Wang Fu-Min, Yin Lu, Du Li-Juan
Department of Ultrasonography, Affiliated to Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 May;12(5):2767-2776. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-931.
Coronary slow flow phenomenon (CSFP) is not uncommon in conventional coronary angiography. A disorder of serum homocysteine (tHcy) metabolism may play a role in the pathogenesis of slow coronary flow. Moreover, elevated tHcy concentration is closely associated with atherosclerosis. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between carotid artery stiffness and serum tHcy levels in patients with CSFP.
This was a case-control study. The study population comprised 146 patients with newly diagnosed stable angina, including 73 patients with CSFP and 73 patients with normal coronary flow. All participants underwent conventional coronary angiography, carotid ultrasonography, and biochemical examination.
The carotid artery stiffness parameters of β index (β), pressure-strain elastic modulus (Ep), and local pulse wave velocity (PWV) in the CSFP group were significantly higher than those in the control group (β: 10.75±2.16 9.02±2.11, P=0.007; Ep: 147.41±41.22 116.21±39.21, P=0.004; PWV: 7.45±1.23 6.16±1.20, P=0.003), However, arterial compliance (AC) was lower in the CSFP group than the control group (0.52±0.11 0.69±0.24, P=0.008). The mean thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count and the tHcy concentration in the CSFP group were significantly higher than those in the control group (48.60±1.30 24.50±3.80, P=0.001; 19.95±4.00 9.12±2.72, P=0.009). The tHcy concentration was positively correlated with β (R value =0.494, P<0.0001), Ep (R value =0.469, P<0.0001), and PWV (R value =0.436, P<0.0001), but negatively correlated with AC (R value =-0.230, P=0.022). The predictors of CSFP were tHcy concentration, left PWV, right PWV, left β index, and right β index. Among them, the left β index and right β index were the best indictors for predicting CSFP. The cutoff values of left β index, right β index, left PWV, and right PWV were 9.3, 9.3, 6.7, and 6.6, respectively.
Our data showed that serum tHcy levels were elevated in patients with CSFP compared with the control group. Carotid artery stiffness parameters were correlated with tHcy. The best predictors of CSFP were left β index and right β index. These findings may contribute to a better understanding of systemic vascular disorders in patients with coronary slow flow, rather than simply attributing such disorders to a single and isolated lesion of the epicardial coronary artery.
冠状动脉血流缓慢现象(CSFP)在常规冠状动脉造影中并不少见。血清同型半胱氨酸(tHcy)代谢紊乱可能在冠状动脉血流缓慢的发病机制中起作用。此外,tHcy浓度升高与动脉粥样硬化密切相关。我们旨在评估CSFP患者颈动脉僵硬度与血清tHcy水平之间的关系。
这是一项病例对照研究。研究人群包括146例新诊断的稳定型心绞痛患者,其中73例为CSFP患者,73例冠状动脉血流正常患者。所有参与者均接受了常规冠状动脉造影、颈动脉超声检查和生化检查。
CSFP组的颈动脉僵硬度参数β指数(β)、压力应变弹性模量(Ep)和局部脉搏波速度(PWV)显著高于对照组(β:10.75±2.16对9.02±2.11,P = 0.007;Ep:147.41±41.22对116.21±39.21,P = 0.004;PWV:7.45±1.23对6.16±1.20,P = 0.003),然而,CSFP组的动脉顺应性(AC)低于对照组(0.52±0.11对0.69±0.24,P = 0.008)。CSFP组的心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)帧数平均值和tHcy浓度显著高于对照组(48.60±1.30对24.50±3.80,P = 0.001;19.95±4.00对9.12±2.72,P = 0.009)。tHcy浓度与β(R值= 0.494,P <0.0001)、Ep(R值= 0.469,P <0.0001)和PWV(R值= 0.436,P <0.0001)呈正相关,但与AC呈负相关(R值= -0.230,P = 0.022)。CSFP的预测因素为tHcy浓度、左PWV、右PWV、左β指数和右β指数。其中,左β指数和右β指数是预测CSFP的最佳指标。左β指数、右β指数、左PWV和右PWV的截断值分别为9.3、9.3、6.7和6.6。
我们的数据显示,与对照组相比,CSFP患者的血清tHcy水平升高。颈动脉僵硬度参数与tHcy相关。CSFP的最佳预测指标是左β指数和右β指数。这些发现可能有助于更好地理解冠状动脉血流缓慢患者的全身血管疾病,而不是简单地将此类疾病归因于心外膜冠状动脉的单一孤立病变。