Tu Chunrong, Shen Hesong, Liu Renwei, Wang Xing, Li Xiaoqin, Yuan Xiaoqian, Chen Qiuzhi, Wang Yu, Ran Zijuan, Lan Xiaosong, Zhang Xiaoyue, Lin Meng, Zhang Jiuquan
Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, 181 Hanyu Road, Chonqing, 400030, China.
Siemens Healthineers, Xi'an, China.
Insights Imaging. 2022 May 4;13(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01224-5.
To assess the value of myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) derived from contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography (CT) for longitudinal evaluation of cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer (BC) treated with anthracycline (AC).
A total of 1151 patients with BC treated with anthracyclines, who underwent at least baseline, and first follow-up contrast-enhanced chest CT were evaluated. ECV and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured before (ECV, LVEF), during ((ECV, LVEF) and (ECV, LVEF)), and after (ECV, LVEF) AC treatment. ECV values were evaluated at the middle of left ventricular septum on venous phase images. Cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) was recorded.
Mean baseline LVEF values were 65.85% ± 2.72% and 102 patients developed CTRCD. The mean ECV was 26.76% ± 3.03% (N = 1151). ECV, ECV, and ECV (median interval: 61 (IQR, 46-75), 180 (IQR, 170-190), 350 (IQR, 341-360) days from baseline) were 31.32% ± 3.10%, 29.60% ± 3.24%, and 32.05% ± 3.58% (N = 1151, N = 841, N = 511). ECV, ECV, and ECV were significantly higher than ECV (p < 0.001). ECV and ECV showed no difference between CTRCD (+) and CTRCD (-) group (p = 0.150; p = 0.216). However, ECV and ECV showed significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.001; p < 0.001).
CT-derived ECV is a potential biomarker for dynamic monitoring AC cardiotoxicity in patients with BC.
评估通过对比增强胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)得出的心肌细胞外容积(ECV)对接受蒽环类药物(AC)治疗的乳腺癌(BC)患者心脏毒性进行纵向评估的价值。
对1151例接受蒽环类药物治疗的BC患者进行评估,这些患者至少接受了基线及首次随访对比增强胸部CT检查。在AC治疗前(ECV、左心室射血分数[LVEF])、治疗期间([ECV、LVEF]和[ECV、LVEF])以及治疗后(ECV、LVEF)测量ECV和LVEF。在静脉期图像上于左心室间隔中部评估ECV值。记录癌症治疗相关心脏功能障碍(CTRCD)情况。
平均基线LVEF值为65.85%±2.72%,102例患者发生CTRCD。平均ECV为26.76%±3.03%(N = 1151)。ECV、ECV和ECV(距基线的中位间隔时间:61天[四分位间距,46 - 75天]、180天[四分位间距,170 - 190天]、350天[四分位间距,341 - 360天])分别为31.32%±3.10%、29.60%±3.24%和32.05%±3.58%(N = 1151、N = 841、N = 511)。ECV、ECV和ECV显著高于ECV(p < 0.001)。ECV和ECV在CTRCD(+)组与CTRCD(-)组之间无差异(p = 0.150;p = 0.216)。然而,ECV和ECV在两组之间存在显著差异(p < 0.001;p < 0.001)。
CT得出的ECV是动态监测BC患者AC心脏毒性的潜在生物标志物。