Suppr超能文献

用于证明清洗效果的测试土壤的标准化评估方法。

A standardized method for evaluating test soils used to demonstrate cleaning efficacy.

机构信息

Johnson & Johnson, Raritan, NJ, USA.

STERIS Corporation, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2022 Aug;126:52-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.04.012. Epub 2022 May 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cleaning and associated validation requirements are essential for the safe use of reusable devices. In the past, test methods and associated endpoints for cleaning validations have varied worldwide. Recent international standards have updated the requirements to include cleaning endpoints and requirements for the use of test soils for demonstrating cleaning efficacy of washer-disinfectors.

METHODS

A quantitative comparison of test soils used in cleaning efficacy studies was conducted using a new standardized test method as published in Annexe B ISO 15883-5:2021. Test soils included Artificial Test Soil (ATS 2015), Blood Test Soil (BTS), Coagulated Blood, Defibrinated Blood Soil (DBLSO), Modified Coagulated Blood Soil, Two Component Blood Test Soil and the UK Test Soil (Edinburgh Soil).

CONCLUSION

All the test soils demonstrated acceptable performance in accordance with the standard.

摘要

背景

清洁及相关验证要求对于可重复使用设备的安全使用至关重要。过去,全球范围内清洁验证的测试方法和相关终点各不相同。最近的国际标准更新了要求,包括清洁终点以及使用测试土来证明清洗消毒器清洁效果的要求。

方法

使用新发布的 ISO 15883-5:2021 附录 B 中规定的标准化测试方法,对清洁效果研究中使用的测试土进行了定量比较。测试土包括人工测试土(ATS 2015)、血测试土(BTS)、凝结血、去纤维蛋白血土(DBLSO)、改良凝结血土、双组份血测试土和英国测试土(爱丁堡土)。

结论

所有测试土均按照标准要求表现出可接受的性能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验