Biomed Instrum Technol. 2023;57(4):136-142. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-57.4.136. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
While selecting the test variables for a cleaning validation for reusable medical devices, the manufacturer must provide a simulative and clinically representative challenge for the device. An appropriate challenge must be identified with care so as not to overchallenge the cleaning process by selecting the worst case for every variable, thus leading to an impossible validation or unrealistic processing requirements. To appropriately select the testing variables, an understanding of the challenge to the cleaning process is important. The relationship among device material, test soil, and application method was investigated by testing 140 variable combinations, including seven materials (stainless steel, polyoxymethylene, polyether ether ketone, nitinol, aluminum, titanium, and silicone), four test soils (defibrinated blood soil, coagulated blood, modified coagulated blood, and Miles soil), and five soil application methods (pipetting neat, pipetting spreader, painting, handling with soiled gloves, and immersion). Stainless steel was the only material that showed consistent soil application in a thickness (at ~6 μL/cm) that fully covered the test surface without some element of pooling, cracking, flaking, or soil migration with all test soils and application methods. The data collected using solubility testing indicated that a complex relationship for material adherence may exist between device materials and test soil. Stainless steel was the most challenging material tested.
在为可重复使用医疗器械的清洁验证选择测试变量时,制造商必须为器械提供模拟的、具有临床代表性的挑战。必须谨慎选择适当的挑战,以免通过为每个变量选择最坏情况而过度挑战清洁过程,从而导致验证不可能或处理要求不切实际。为了正确选择测试变量,了解清洁过程所面临的挑战很重要。通过测试 140 种变量组合,包括七种材料(不锈钢、聚甲醛、聚醚醚酮、镍钛合金、铝、钛和硅酮)、四种测试土壤(去纤维血土、凝固血、改良凝固血和 Miles 土)和五种土壤应用方法(直接吸取、涂抹器涂抹、刷涂、戴脏手套操作和浸泡),研究了器械材料、测试土壤和应用方法之间的关系。不锈钢是唯一一种在完全覆盖测试表面的厚度(约 6 μL/cm)下表现出一致的土壤应用的材料,没有出现任何聚积、开裂、剥落或土壤迁移的现象,适用于所有测试土壤和应用方法。使用溶解度测试收集的数据表明,器械材料和测试土壤之间可能存在复杂的材料附着关系。不锈钢是测试中最具挑战性的材料。