Suppr超能文献

电子烟税对中低收入国家香烟和电子烟使用情况的影响:来自印度尼西亚的一项基于前后设计的研究。

Impact of an e-cigarette tax on cigarette and e-cigarette use in a middle-income country: a study from Indonesia using a pre-post design.

机构信息

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 May 4;12(5):e055483. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055483.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Indonesia implemented its first e-cigarette regulation in 2018, a 57% tax on the retail price of e-cigarette liquid (e-liquid), exceeding the 40% average tax on cigarettes. Economic research suggests that this tax could unintentionally increase cigarette smoking among dual users, but this has not been examined in a low-income or middle-income country. We therefore investigated the effects of the e-liquid tax among adults in Indonesia.

DESIGN

Pre-post study.

SETTING

Indonesia.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults who currently used e-cigarettes and either currently or occasionally smoked cigarettes or recently quit were recruited using Facebook and Instagram ads. Our follow-up response rate was 79%. A final sample of 1039 adults participated.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

E-cigarette and cigarette use.

RESULTS

Following the e-liquid tax, participants reported paying a 4.4% higher price for e-liquid (p=0.02). Participants also reported an average 0.5-day decrease in the number of days they used e-cigarettes in the past week (p<0.001), and the proportion of daily e-cigarette users decreased (75.9% to 63.6%; p<0.001). Overall, reported use of cigarettes also declined, on average, by nine cigarettes per week. Participants who reported decreasing their e-cigarette use had higher odds of reporting increasing their cigarette use rather than reporting no change (adjusted OR: 2.99; 95% CI: 1.95 to 4.59). Further, as participants reported using e-cigarettes less frequently, they reported using cigarettes more frequently (β=-2.41, p=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Following an e-liquid tax in Indonesia, prices of e-liquid increased slightly, e-cigarette and cigarette use declined, and people who reported decreasing their e-cigarette use reported increasing their cigarette use. To avoid encouraging cigarette use, a prudent approach would be to raise cigarette taxes concurrently with e-cigarette taxes.

摘要

目的

印度尼西亚于 2018 年实施了首个电子烟监管规定,对电子烟液(e-liquid)的零售价征收 57%的税,超过了 40%的香烟平均税率。经济研究表明,这一税收可能会在无意中增加双重使用者的吸烟量,但在低收入或中等收入国家,这一点尚未得到检验。因此,我们调查了印度尼西亚成年人中电子烟液税的影响。

设计

前后研究。

地点

印度尼西亚。

参与者

目前使用电子烟且目前或偶尔吸烟或最近戒烟的成年人通过 Facebook 和 Instagram 广告招募。我们的后续回复率为 79%。最终有 1039 名成年人参与了研究。

主要结果测量

电子烟和香烟使用情况。

结果

在电子烟液税实施后,参与者报告电子烟液的价格上涨了 4.4%(p=0.02)。参与者还报告称,过去一周使用电子烟的天数平均减少了 0.5 天(p<0.001),并且每天使用电子烟的人数比例下降(75.9%降至 63.6%;p<0.001)。总体而言,报告的香烟使用量平均每周减少了 9 支。报告减少电子烟使用量的参与者更有可能报告增加香烟使用量,而不是报告没有变化(调整后的比值比:2.99;95%置信区间:1.95 至 4.59)。此外,随着参与者报告使用电子烟的频率降低,他们报告使用香烟的频率增加(β=-2.41,p=0.007)。

结论

在印度尼西亚征收电子烟液税后,电子烟液价格略有上涨,电子烟和香烟使用量下降,报告减少电子烟使用量的人报告增加了香烟使用量。为避免鼓励吸烟,谨慎的做法是在征收电子烟税的同时提高香烟税。

相似文献

2
Investigating the Impact of E-Cigarette Price and Tax on E-Cigarette Use Behavior.
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Jun;64(6):797-804. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.01.015. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
3
Effect of Massachusetts House Bill No. 4196 on electronic cigarette use: a mixed-methods study.
Harm Reduct J. 2021 May 5;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00498-0.
4
Re-exploring the early relationship between teenage cigarette and e-cigarette use using price and tax changes.
Health Econ. 2022 Jan;31(1):137-153. doi: 10.1002/hec.4439. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
5
The pass-through of excise taxes to market prices of heated tobacco products (HTPs) and cigarettes: a cross-country analysis.
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Jun;24(4):591-607. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01499-x. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
6
Are lower income smokers more price sensitive?: the evidence from Korean cigarette tax increases.
Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051680. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
7
Young adult responses to taxes on cigarettes and electronic nicotine delivery systems.
Addiction. 2022 Dec;117(12):3121-3128. doi: 10.1111/add.16002. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
8
Combustible cigarettes cost less to use than e-cigarettes: global evidence and tax policy implications.
Tob Control. 2017 Mar;26(2):158-163. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052874. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
9
The impact of price and tobacco control policies on the demand for electronic nicotine delivery systems.
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii41-7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051515.
10
Tobacco excise tax increase and illicit cigarette consumption: evidence from Vietnam.
Tob Control. 2020 Oct;29(Suppl 4):s275-s280. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055301. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Smoke economics: lessons from tobacco ban for e-cigarette regulation in Bhutan.
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2025 Mar 25;35:100560. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2025.100560. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Electronic cigarettes and subsequent cigarette smoking in young people: A systematic review.
Addiction. 2025 Jun;120(6):1090-1111. doi: 10.1111/add.16773. Epub 2025 Jan 30.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of e-cigarette taxes on e-cigarette prices and tobacco product sales: Evidence from retail panel data.
J Health Econ. 2022 Dec;86:102676. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102676. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
2
The effects of traditional cigarette and e-cigarette tax rates on adult tobacco product use.
J Risk Uncertain. 2020 Jun;60(3):229-258. doi: 10.1007/s11166-020-09330-9. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
3
E-Cigarettes and Adult Smoking: Evidence from Minnesota.
J Risk Uncertain. 2020 Jun;60(3):207-228. doi: 10.1007/s11166-020-09326-5. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
JUUL from the USA to Indonesia: implications for expansion to LMICs.
Tob Control. 2020 Dec;29(e1):e155-e156. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-054979. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
5
From Apple to Werewolf: A content analysis of marketing for e-liquids on Instagram.
Addict Behav. 2019 Apr;91:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Sep 9.
7
The Experimental Tobacco Marketplace II: Substitutability and sex effects in dual electronic cigarette and conventional cigarette users.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Sep 1;178:551-555. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
8
Recommended core items to assess e-cigarette use in population-based surveys.
Tob Control. 2018 May;27(3):341-346. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053541. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
9
The effect of excise tax increases on cigarette prices in South Africa.
Tob Control. 2018 Jan;27(1):65-71. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053340. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
10
U.S. Demand for Tobacco Products in a System Framework.
Health Econ. 2017 Aug;26(8):1067-1086. doi: 10.1002/hec.3384. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验