• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Implementing a Canadian shared-care ADHD program in Beijing: Barriers and facilitators to consider prior to start-up.在中国北京实施加拿大共病注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)项目:启动前需要考虑的障碍和促进因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 May 5;22(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03955-7.
2
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a Canadian shared-care ADHD program in pediatric settings in Shanghai: a consolidated framework for implementation research approach.在上海儿科环境中实施加拿大共病注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)项目的障碍和促进因素:实施研究方法的综合框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 2;24(1):564. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10910-7.
3
Healthcare providers' perspectives on perceived barriers and facilitators of compassion: Results from a grounded theory study.医疗保健提供者对同情心的感知障碍和促进因素的看法:扎根理论研究的结果。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 May;27(9-10):2083-2097. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14357.
4
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
5
Exploring Chiropractic Services in the Canadian Forces Health Services - Perceptions of Facilitators and Barriers Among Key Informants.探索加拿大军队医疗服务中的整脊疗法——关键信息提供者对促进因素和障碍的看法。
Mil Med. 2019 May 1;184(5-6):e344-e351. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy319.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Barriers to implementation of treatment guidelines for ADHD in adults with substance use disorder.物质使用障碍成人注意缺陷多动障碍治疗指南实施障碍。
J Dual Diagn. 2014;10(3):130-8. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2014.926691.
8
Assessment of barriers and facilitators in the implementation of appropriate use criteria for elective percutaneous coronary interventions: a qualitative study.评估选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗适当使用标准实施过程中的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Aug 13;18(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0901-6.
9
Barriers and facilitators when implementing family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres - a nested qualitative study.在社区心理健康中心实施精神病患者家庭参与时的障碍和促进因素 - 一项嵌套定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 12;22(1):1153. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08489-y.
10
Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospitals from policy to practice: a systematic review.医院中从政策到实践的共享决策的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 31;16(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01142-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a Canadian shared-care ADHD program in pediatric settings in Shanghai: a consolidated framework for implementation research approach.在上海儿科环境中实施加拿大共病注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)项目的障碍和促进因素:实施研究方法的综合框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 2;24(1):564. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10910-7.
2
Correction: Implementing a Canadian shared-care ADHD program in Beijing: Barriers and facilitators to consider prior to start-up.更正:在北京实施加拿大共享照护注意缺陷多动障碍项目:启动前需考虑的障碍与促进因素
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 14;22(1):699. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04361-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors influencing the uptake of evidence in child health policy-making: results of a survey among 23 European countries.影响儿童卫生政策制定中证据采纳的因素:对 23 个欧洲国家的调查结果。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Nov 7;19(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00786-y.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of online versus alternative methods for training licensed health care professionals to deliver clinical interventions.一项关于在线与替代方法培训持照卫生保健专业人员实施临床干预的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1047-4.
3
Impact of Human Resources on Implementing an Evidence-Based HIV Prevention Intervention.人力资源对实施基于证据的艾滋病毒预防干预措施的影响。
AIDS Behav. 2017 May;21(5):1394-1406. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1425-7.
4
Barriers to the Identification and Management of Psychosocial Problems: Changes From 2004 to 2013.心理社会问题识别与管理的障碍:2004年至2013年的变化
Acad Pediatr. 2015 Nov-Dec;15(6):613-20. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
5
Mortality in children, adolescents, and adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a nationwide cohort study.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童、青少年和成人的死亡率:一项全国性队列研究。
Lancet. 2015 May 30;385(9983):2190-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61684-6. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
6
Practitioner Review: Pathways to care for ADHD - a systematic review of barriers and facilitators.从业者综述:注意缺陷多动障碍的护理途径——障碍与促进因素的系统综述
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;56(6):598-617. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12398. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
7
Nonpharmacological interventions for ADHD: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of dietary and psychological treatments.非药物干预 ADHD:饮食和心理治疗的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;170(3):275-89. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12070991.
8
Living with the BRCA genetic mutation: an uncertain conclusion to an unending process.携带有 BRCA 基因突变:一个不确定的结论,一个无尽的过程。
Psychol Health Med. 2013;18(2):125-34. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2012.687827. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
9
Assessing the benefits of participatory research: a rationale for a realist review.评估参与式研究的效益:进行现实主义综述的基本原理。
Glob Health Promot. 2011 Jun;18(2):45-8. doi: 10.1177/1757975910383936.
10
Research evidence utilization in policy development by child welfare administrators.儿童福利管理人员在政策制定中对研究证据的运用。
Child Welfare. 2010;89(4):83-100.

在中国北京实施加拿大共病注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)项目:启动前需要考虑的障碍和促进因素。

Implementing a Canadian shared-care ADHD program in Beijing: Barriers and facilitators to consider prior to start-up.

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), Beijing, 100191, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2022 May 5;22(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03955-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-022-03955-7
PMID:35513799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9069949/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The shared care pathway for ADHD is a program developed in Canada with two main strategies: (a) implement a shared care pathway between general practitioners (GPs) and specialists, and (b) step up or down care so that the patient is treated at the most appropriate level of care, depending on the complexity or outcome of their illness. The current study aims to identify the challenges and facilitators of implementing this program in a Chinese mental health service setting.

METHODS

Two focus groups were conducted using semi-structured interviews with a total of 7 health care providers in Beijing. An adapted grounded theory methodology using open-ended, axial and selective coding was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

We identified three main levels related to barriers and facilitators: (1) a sociocultural level of patients' and health care providers' perspectives; (2) a structural level related to internal and external organizational environments; (3) and the level of the intervention itself with its characteristics. The project is generally aligned with the mandates and goals of the health system, but two of the main obstacles are the varying qualifications of physicians in hospitals of different levels, implying different needs and flexible and adapted training programs, and the lack of appropriate patient referral systems between the different hospital levels.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the importance of consultation to obtain a "lay of the land" for deciding on the implementation steps of an a priori well accepted model of care.

摘要

背景

注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)共病管理路径是在加拿大开发的一个项目,其具有两个主要策略:(a)在全科医生(GP)和专家之间实施共病管理路径;(b)根据患者疾病的复杂性或结果,调整或增加护理级别,使患者在最合适的护理级别接受治疗。本研究旨在确定在中国精神卫生服务环境中实施该项目的挑战和促进因素。

方法

在北京的 7 名卫生保健提供者中进行了 2 次焦点小组讨论,采用半结构化访谈,使用开放式、轴向和选择性编码进行数据分析。

结果

我们确定了与障碍和促进因素相关的三个主要层面:(1)患者和卫生保健提供者观点的社会文化层面;(2)与内部和外部组织环境相关的结构层面;(3)干预本身及其特征的层面。该项目通常符合卫生系统的任务和目标,但有两个主要障碍,一是不同级别医院医生的资质不同,需要不同的培训内容和灵活的适应性培训计划;二是不同医院级别之间缺乏适当的患者转诊系统。

结论

我们的研究强调了咨询的重要性,以了解情况,确定预先接受的护理模式的实施步骤。