Kotagudda Ranganath S, Schlund M, Delattre Jérôme, Ferri J, Chai F
Univ. Lille, INSERM, CHU Lille, U1008-Controlled Drug Delivery Systems and Biomaterials, Lille, France.
Univ. Lille, Univ. Littoral Côte d'Opale, F-62200, Boulogne-sur-Mer, CHU Lille, F-59000, ULR 4490, MABLab - Adiposité Médullaire et Os, Lille, France.
Mater Today Bio. 2022 Apr 20;14:100267. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100267. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Most existing preclinical models for evaluating the biosafety and bone-regeneration efficacy of innovative bone substitute materials (BSMs) or tissue engineering (TE) constructs only consisted of a single-site defect and the anatomical locations of defect varied drastically. While the compelling evidence showed that the bone healing pattern is location-dependent, owing to developmental, structural, and functional differences of anatomical locations, this is particularly true for the craniofacial region. Taking this into account, the bone healing efficiency of a BSM shown at one anatomical defect location cannot ensure the same impact at another. This prompted us to develop, for the first time, a model of bilateral critical-sized defect (CSD) at two distinctly different locations (non-load-bearing parietal calvaria and load-bearing mandibular body) co-existing in one rabbit to reduce the number of animals needed and avoid the influence of interindividual variability and evaluation bias on comparisons. 24 healthy adult male New Zealand White rabbits were randomly assigned to a group, either control, autograft (considered the "gold standard") or a clinically relevant BSM (biphasic calcium phosphate granules) (BCPg, Mastergraft®, Medronics). The full-thickness cylindrical calvarial defect (ø10 mm) on frontoparietal region and mandibular composite defect (ø11 mm) on the body of the mandible were created bilaterally using low-speed drilling with saline irrigation. The defect on one side was filled with autograft debris or BCPg, and the other side was no graft (empty). Following the euthanasia of animals at the predetermined intervals (4w and 12w), the defect zones were examined macroscopically and then sampled and processed for microcomputed tomography (microCT) and histological analysis. All surgeries went uneventfully, and all rabbits recovered slowly but steadily. No symptoms of infection or inflammation associated with the defect were observed during the experiment. At 4w and 12w, macroscopic views of all defect sites were clean without any signs of necrosis or abscess, and no intraoral communication was found. The analysis of microCT and histological findings showed the non-healing nature of the empty defect, thereby both calvaria and mandible CSDs can be validated. The study of the application of BCPg in this defect model highlighted good osteointegration and excellent osteoconductive properties but compromised the osteoinductive properties of this material (compared with autograft). To conclude, this novel double-site CSD model holds great promise in the application for preclinical evaluation of BSMs, TE construct, etc. With a reduced number of animals in use, and lower interindividual variability and evaluation bias for comparisons.
大多数现有的用于评估新型骨替代材料(BSMs)或组织工程(TE)构建体的生物安全性和骨再生效率的临床前模型仅包含单部位缺损,且缺损的解剖位置差异很大。虽然有力的证据表明骨愈合模式取决于位置,由于解剖位置的发育、结构和功能差异,在颅面区域尤其如此。考虑到这一点,在一个解剖缺损位置显示的BSM的骨愈合效率不能确保在另一个位置有相同的影响。这促使我们首次在一只兔子身上开发了一种双侧临界尺寸缺损(CSD)模型,该模型存在于两个明显不同的位置(非承重的顶骨颅骨和承重的下颌骨体),以减少所需动物的数量,并避免个体间变异性和评估偏差对比较的影响。24只健康成年雄性新西兰白兔被随机分为一组,即对照组、自体移植组(被视为“金标准”)或临床相关的BSM(双相磷酸钙颗粒)(BCPg,Mastergraft®,美敦力)。使用低速钻孔并盐水冲洗,在双侧创建额顶区域的全层圆柱形颅骨缺损(ø10 mm)和下颌骨体的下颌复合缺损(ø11 mm)。一侧的缺损用自体移植碎片或BCPg填充,另一侧不进行移植(空缺损)。在预定时间间隔(4周和12周)对动物实施安乐死后,对缺损区域进行宏观检查,然后取样并进行微计算机断层扫描(microCT)和组织学分析。所有手术均顺利进行,所有兔子恢复缓慢但稳定。在实验过程中未观察到与缺损相关的感染或炎症症状。在4周和12周时,所有缺损部位的宏观视图均干净,无任何坏死或脓肿迹象,且未发现口腔内连通。对microCT和组织学结果的分析显示空缺损的不愈合性质,从而可以验证颅骨和下颌骨CSD。对BCPg在该缺损模型中的应用研究突出了其良好的骨整合和优异的骨传导性能,但该材料的骨诱导性能有所受损(与自体移植相比)。总之,这种新型的双部位CSD模型在BSMs、TE构建体等的临床前评估应用中具有很大的前景。使用的动物数量减少,个体间变异性和比较的评估偏差较低。